Kinesiology and Health Promotion, Cal Poly Pomona, 3801 W Temple Ave, Pomona, CA 91768, USA.
J Neurophysiol. 2010 Dec;104(6):3510-7. doi: 10.1152/jn.00820.2009. Epub 2010 Sep 15.
Distractions affect postural control, but this mechanism is not well understood. Diversion of resources during cognitive stress may lead to decreased motor drive and postural muscle tone. This may appear as decreased postural stiffness and increased postural sway amplitude. We hypothesized that dual tasking leads to decreased stiffness and increased sway amplitude. Postural sway (center of pressure; COP) data were used from 724 participants aged 77.9 ± 5.3 yr, a representative sample of community-dwelling older adults, the MOBILIZE Boston Study cohort. Subjects stood barefoot with eyes open for 30 s per trial on a force plate. Five trials were performed each with and without a serial subtractions-by-3 task. Sway data were fit to a damped oscillator inverted pendulum model. Amplitudes (COP and center of mass), mechanical stiffness, and damping of the sway behavior were determined. Sway amplitudes and damping increased with the dual task (P < 0.001); stiffness decreased only mediolaterally (P < 0.001). Those with difficulty doing the dual task exhibited larger sway and less damping mediolaterally (P ≤ 0.001) and an increased stiffness with dual task anteroposteriorly (interaction P = 0.004). Dual task could still independently explain increases in sway (P < 0.001) after accounting for stiffness changes. Thus the hypothesis was supported only in mediolateral sway. The simple model helped to explain the dual task related increase of sway only mediolaterally. It also elucidated the differential influence of cognitive function on the mechanics of anteroposterior and mediolateral sway behaviors. Dual task may divert the resources necessary for mediolateral postural control, thus leading to falls.
干扰会影响姿势控制,但这一机制尚未得到很好的理解。认知压力下资源的转移可能导致运动驱动力和姿势肌肉张力降低。这可能表现为姿势刚度降低和姿势摆动幅度增加。我们假设双重任务会导致刚度降低和摆动幅度增加。使用了来自 724 名年龄为 77.9 ± 5.3 岁的参与者的姿势摆动(压力中心;COP)数据,这些参与者是居住在社区的老年人的代表性样本,即 MOBILIZE Boston 研究队列。在测力板上,参与者赤脚睁眼,每次试验站立 30 秒。每个试验都进行了五次,一次是在有连续 3 次减数任务的情况下,一次是没有。将摆动数据拟合到阻尼振荡器倒立摆模型中。确定了摆动行为的幅度(COP 和质心)、机械刚度和阻尼。随着双重任务的进行,摆动幅度和阻尼增加(P < 0.001);仅在中间到侧面刚度降低(P < 0.001)。那些难以完成双重任务的人在中间到侧面摆动幅度更大、阻尼更小(P ≤ 0.001),并且前后向刚度随着双重任务的增加而增加(交互 P = 0.004)。在考虑到刚度变化后,双重任务仍然可以独立解释摆动的增加(P < 0.001)。因此,假设仅在中间到侧面的摆动中得到支持。简单的模型有助于解释仅在中间到侧面的双重任务相关的摆动增加。它还阐明了认知功能对前后和中间到侧面摆动行为力学的不同影响。双重任务可能会转移进行中间到侧面姿势控制所需的资源,从而导致跌倒。