Division of Gerontology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 110 Francis St. Suite 1B, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2010 Dec;109(6):1786-91. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00390.2010. Epub 2010 Oct 14.
The degree of multiscale complexity in human behavioral regulation, such as that required for postural control, appears to decrease with advanced aging or disease. To help delineate causes and functional consequences of complexity loss, we examined the effects of visual and somatosensory impairment on the complexity of postural sway during quiet standing and its relationship to postural adaptation to cognitive dual tasking. Participants of the MOBILIZE Boston Study were classified into mutually exclusive groups: controls [intact vision and foot somatosensation, n = 299, 76 ± 5 (SD) yr old], visual impairment only (<20/40 vision, n = 81, 77 ± 4 yr old), somatosensory impairment only (inability to perceive 5.07 monofilament on plantar halluxes, n = 48, 80 ± 5 yr old), and combined impairments (n = 25, 80 ± 4 yr old). Postural sway (i.e., center-of-pressure) dynamics were assessed during quiet standing and cognitive dual tasking, and a complexity index was quantified using multiscale entropy analysis. Postural sway speed and area, which did not correlate with complexity, were also computed. During quiet standing, the complexity index (mean ± SD) was highest in controls (9.5 ± 1.2) and successively lower in the visual (9.1 ± 1.1), somatosensory (8.6 ± 1.6), and combined (7.8 ± 1.3) impairment groups (P = 0.001). Dual tasking resulted in increased sway speed and area but reduced complexity (P < 0.01). Lower complexity during quiet standing correlated with greater absolute (R = -0.34, P = 0.002) and percent (R = -0.45, P < 0.001) increases in postural sway speed from quiet standing to dual-tasking conditions. Sensory impairments contributed to decreased postural sway complexity, which reflected reduced adaptive capacity of the postural control system. Relatively low baseline complexity may, therefore, indicate control systems that are more vulnerable to cognitive and other stressors.
在人体行为调节的多尺度复杂性方面,例如姿势控制所需要的复杂性,随着年龄的增长或疾病的发展似乎会降低。为了帮助阐明复杂性丧失的原因和功能后果,我们研究了视觉和躯体感觉损伤对安静站立时姿势摆动复杂性的影响及其与认知双重任务下姿势适应的关系。MOBILIZE 波士顿研究的参与者被分为互斥的组:对照组(视力和足部感觉正常,n = 299,76 ± 5 岁)、仅视觉损伤组(视力<20/40,n = 81,77 ± 4 岁)、仅躯体感觉损伤组(无法感知足底大脚趾的 5.07 单丝,n = 48,80 ± 5 岁)和联合损伤组(n = 25,80 ± 4 岁)。在安静站立和认知双重任务期间评估姿势摆动(即,身体重心)动力学,并使用多尺度熵分析量化复杂性指数。还计算了与复杂性不相关的姿势摆动速度和面积。在安静站立时,对照组的复杂性指数(平均值 ± 标准差)最高(9.5 ± 1.2),其次是视觉损伤组(9.1 ± 1.1)、躯体感觉损伤组(8.6 ± 1.6)和联合损伤组(7.8 ± 1.3)(P = 0.001)。双重任务导致摆动速度和面积增加,但复杂性降低(P < 0.01)。安静站立时的较低复杂性与从安静站立到双重任务条件下姿势摆动速度的绝对(R = -0.34,P = 0.002)和百分比(R = -0.45,P < 0.001)增加呈负相关。躯体感觉损伤导致姿势摆动复杂性降低,这反映了姿势控制系统适应能力降低。因此,相对较低的基线复杂性可能表明控制系统更容易受到认知和其他应激源的影响。