Suppr超能文献

肉毒杆菌毒素、扩张术还是肌切开术?贲门失弛缓症介入和手术治疗的临床结果。

Botox, dilation, or myotomy? Clinical outcome of interventional and surgical therapies for achalasia.

机构信息

Department of General-, Visceral-, and Cancer Surgery, University of Cologne, Kerpener Strasse 62, 50931, Cologne, Germany.

出版信息

Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2010 Nov;395(8):1093-9. doi: 10.1007/s00423-010-0711-5. Epub 2010 Sep 16.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Achalasia is a rare, but well-defined primary esophageal motor disorder. Classic therapeutic approaches include botulinum toxin injection, balloon dilation, and surgical myotomy of the lower esophageal sphincter. This report summarizes our experience with different treatment modalities for achalasia.

METHODS

Forty-three patients with achalasia treated in our hospital were subdivided according to therapeutic strategy: endoscopic botulinum toxin injection into the lower esophageal sphincter (EBTI; n = 7), endoscopic esophageal balloon dilation (EBD; n = 16), surgical myotomy after failed esophageal balloon dilation (EBD-HM; n = 14), and first-line surgical myotomy (HM; n = 6). Therapeutic efficiency was evaluated comparing standardized symptom scores preoperatively and at follow-up.

RESULTS

There was no mortality and no significant difference between the groups for age, sex, or morbidity. The mean follow-up was at 9, 35, 38, and 17 months. At follow-up, recurrent or persistent symptoms were found in 71.4%, 6.3%, 35.7%, and 16.7% in EBTI, EBD, EBD-HM, and HM, respectively. Considering EBD-HM patients as failures of esophageal dilation, the total rate of recurrent or persistent symptoms after EBD was 50%. Poor symptomatic outcome was correlated to a low esophageal sphincter pressure during pretherapeutic manometry (p = 0.03) and to sigmoid-shaped esophageal dilatation (p = 0.06).

CONCLUSION

Surgical myotomy is the most reliable first-line therapy for achalasia, particularly in patients with a high sphincter pressure and moderate esophageal dilatation. Botox injection has a high failure rate and should be reserved for exceptional cases. Endoscopic dilation provides about 50% of patients with long-term symptomatic relief; in most cases, failure can be successfully treated surgically.

摘要

目的

贲门失弛缓症是一种罕见但明确的原发性食管动力障碍。经典的治疗方法包括肉毒杆菌毒素注射、球囊扩张和食管下括约肌切开术。本报告总结了我们在不同治疗方法治疗贲门失弛缓症方面的经验。

方法

根据治疗策略,将我院 43 例贲门失弛缓症患者分为以下几类:内镜下食管下括约肌肉毒毒素注射(EBTI;n=7)、内镜下食管球囊扩张(EBD;n=16)、食管球囊扩张失败后的手术肌切开术(EBD-HM;n=14)和一线手术肌切开术(HM;n=6)。通过比较术前和随访时的标准化症状评分来评估治疗效果。

结果

无死亡病例,各组之间的年龄、性别或发病率无显著差异。平均随访时间为 9、35、38 和 17 个月。随访时,EBTI、EBD、EBD-HM 和 HM 组分别有 71.4%、6.3%、35.7%和 16.7%的患者出现复发性或持续性症状。如果将 EBD-HM 患者视为食管扩张失败,则 EBD 后复发性或持续性症状的总发生率为 50%。症状改善不良与治疗前测压时食管下括约肌压力低(p=0.03)和食管扩张呈乙状结肠样(p=0.06)有关。

结论

手术肌切开术是贲门失弛缓症的最可靠一线治疗方法,尤其适用于食管下括约肌压力高和中度食管扩张的患者。肉毒杆菌毒素注射的失败率较高,应保留用于特殊情况。内镜扩张可使约 50%的患者获得长期症状缓解;在大多数情况下,手术可成功治疗失败。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验