• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生物电阻光谱学与容积描记法在上肢肿胀评估中的相关性。

Correlation between bioelectrical spectroscopy and perometry in assessment of upper extremity swelling.

机构信息

Rehabilitation Medicine Department, Mark O. Hatfield Clinical Research Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-1604, USA.

出版信息

Lymphology. 2010 Jun;43(2):85-94.

PMID:20848996
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10350925/
Abstract

Lymphedema is a common side effect of breast cancer treatment and is associated with increased upper extremity volume, functional impairment, and pain. While there is no cure for lymphedema, physical therapy treatment can often alleviate symptoms. To measure the efficacy of treatment, accurate assessment of the limbs is important. Current methods of assessment are complex (water displacement), marginally accurate (circumferential measurements), or expensive (opto-electrical systems). A new method for estimating tissue fluid is bioelectrical spectroscopy (BIS). This method measures impedance to small currents applied to the body and is easily performed. Acceptance of BIS devices for assessment of limb fluid will be dependent on the establishment of sufficient reliability and validity, and the objective of this study was to evaluate reliability and validity of this device compared to perometry. Both upper limbs of ten subjects previously treated for breast cancer were measured using BIS and perometry. We found that inter-rater reliability (r = 0.987) and intrarater reliability (r = 0.993) were acceptably high for the BIS unit and concurrent validity was r = -0.904, when compared to perometry. These results confirm that BIS can produce valid and reliable data related to the assessment of upper limbs affected by lymphedema.

摘要

淋巴水肿是乳腺癌治疗的常见副作用,与上肢体积增加、功能障碍和疼痛有关。虽然淋巴水肿无法治愈,但物理治疗通常可以缓解症状。为了衡量治疗效果,准确评估四肢很重要。目前的评估方法复杂(水置换法)、准确性有限(周径测量)或昂贵(光电系统)。一种新的组织液估计方法是生物电阻抗光谱(BIS)。该方法测量施加到身体上的小电流的阻抗,易于操作。BIS 设备用于评估肢体液体的接受程度将取决于充分的可靠性和有效性的确立,本研究的目的是评估该设备与体积描记法相比的可靠性和有效性。十名先前接受过乳腺癌治疗的受试者的上肢均使用 BIS 和体积描记法进行了测量。我们发现 BIS 单元的组内信度(r = 0.987)和组内信度(r = 0.993)非常高,与体积描记法相比,同期效度为 r = -0.904。这些结果证实 BIS 可以产生与评估受淋巴水肿影响的上肢相关的有效且可靠的数据。

相似文献

1
Correlation between bioelectrical spectroscopy and perometry in assessment of upper extremity swelling.生物电阻光谱学与容积描记法在上肢肿胀评估中的相关性。
Lymphology. 2010 Jun;43(2):85-94.
2
Reliability and limits of agreement of circumferential, water displacement, and optoelectronic volumetry in the measurement of upper limb lymphedema.上肢淋巴水肿测量中周向、水置换和光电体积测量法的可靠性及一致性界限
Lymphology. 2007 Mar;40(1):26-34.
3
Operational equivalence of bioimpedance indices and perometry for the assessment of unilateral arm lymphedema.生物电阻抗指数与视野检查法在评估单侧手臂淋巴水肿方面的操作等效性。
Lymphat Res Biol. 2009;7(2):81-5. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2008.1027.
4
Measurement Properties of Instruments for Measuring of Lymphedema: Systematic Review.测量淋巴水肿仪器的测量属性:系统评价
Phys Ther. 2016 Dec;96(12):1965-1981. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20150412. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
5
Comparison of upper limb volume measurement techniques and arm symptoms between healthy volunteers and individuals with known lymphedema.健康志愿者与已知淋巴水肿个体之间上肢体积测量技术及手臂症状的比较。
Lymphology. 2007 Mar;40(1):35-46.
6
Segmental measurement of breast cancer-related arm lymphoedema using perometry and bioimpedance spectroscopy.应用容积描记法和生物电阻抗光谱法对乳腺癌相关上肢淋巴水肿进行节段测量。
Support Care Cancer. 2011 May;19(5):703-10. doi: 10.1007/s00520-010-0896-8. Epub 2010 May 15.
7
Intra- and Inter-Rater Reliability of Bioimpedance in the Evaluation of Lymphedema Secondary to Treatment of Breast Cancer.生物阻抗在评估乳腺癌治疗后继发性淋巴水肿中的评分者内及评分者间信度
Lymphat Res Biol. 2018 Jun;16(3):282-286. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2017.0036. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
8
Bioelectrical impedance for detecting upper limb lymphedema in nonlaboratory settings.用于在非实验室环境中检测上肢淋巴水肿的生物电阻抗。
Lymphat Res Biol. 2009;7(1):11-5. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2008.1003.
9
A new device to measure upper limb circumferences: validity and reliability.一种用于测量上肢周长的新设备:有效性和可靠性。
Int Angiol. 2010 Oct;29(5):401-7.
10
Self-measurement of upper extremity volume in women post-breast cancer: reliability and validity study.乳腺癌术后女性上肢体积的自我测量:可靠性和有效性研究。
Physiother Theory Pract. 2015 May;31(4):283-7. doi: 10.3109/09593985.2014.994249. Epub 2014 Dec 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Bioimpedance assessment method based on back propagation neural network for irreversible electroporation of liver tissue.基于反向传播神经网络的肝组织不可逆电穿孔生物阻抗评估方法。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 8;15(1):16071. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-01166-0.
2
Decongestive progressive resistance exercise with an adjustable compression wrap for breast cancer-related lymphoedema (DREAM): protocol for a randomised controlled trial.渐进性减压抗阻运动联合可调式压力绷带治疗乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿(DREAM):一项随机对照试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 4;12(4):e053165. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053165.
3
A Comparison of Supine Versus Stand-on Bioimpedance Devices to Assess Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema.仰卧位与站立位生物阻抗设备评估乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿的比较。
Lymphat Res Biol. 2021 Dec;19(6):553-561. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2020.0058. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
4
Is bioimpedance spectroscopy a useful tool for objectively assessing lymphovenous bypass surgical outcomes in breast cancer-related lymphedema?生物电阻抗光谱法是否可作为一种客观评估乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿淋巴静脉旁路手术后结果的有用工具?
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Feb;186(1):1-6. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-06059-6. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
5
Fluid Shifts Induced by Physical Therapy in Lower Limb Lymphedema Patients.物理治疗引起的下肢淋巴水肿患者的体液转移
J Clin Med. 2020 Nov 16;9(11):3678. doi: 10.3390/jcm9113678.
6
Building a Multidisciplinary Comprehensive Academic Lymphedema Program.建立一个多学科综合性学术性淋巴水肿项目。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 Mar 20;8(3):e2670. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002670. eCollection 2020 Mar.
7
Implementation of Single-Tab Electrodes for Bioimpedance Spectroscopy Measures.单电极生物阻抗谱测量的实现。
Lymphat Res Biol. 2020 Jun;18(3):277-283. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2019.0035. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
8
Diagnostic Methods, Risk Factors, Prevention, and Management of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: Past, Present, and Future Directions.乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿的诊断方法、危险因素、预防及管理:过去、现在与未来方向
Curr Breast Cancer Rep. 2017 Jun;9(2):111-121. doi: 10.1007/s12609-017-0237-8. Epub 2017 May 3.
9
Diagnosis of Upper Quadrant Lymphedema Secondary to Cancer: Clinical Practice Guideline From the Oncology Section of the American Physical Therapy Association.癌症继发上象限淋巴水肿的诊断:美国物理治疗协会肿瘤学分会临床实践指南
Phys Ther. 2017 Jul 1;97(7):729-745. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzx050.
10
Diagnosis of Upper-Quadrant Lymphedema Secondary to Cancer: Clinical Practice Guideline From the Oncology Section of APTA.癌症继发上象限淋巴水肿的诊断:美国物理治疗协会肿瘤学分会临床实践指南
Rehabil Oncol. 2017 Jul;35(3):E1-E18. doi: 10.1097/01.REO.0000000000000073. Epub 2017 Jun 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Operational equivalence of bioimpedance indices and perometry for the assessment of unilateral arm lymphedema.生物电阻抗指数与视野检查法在评估单侧手臂淋巴水肿方面的操作等效性。
Lymphat Res Biol. 2009;7(2):81-5. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2008.1027.
2
Lymphedema in breast cancer survivors: incidence, degree, time course, treatment, and symptoms.乳腺癌幸存者的淋巴水肿:发病率、程度、病程、治疗及症状。
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jan 20;27(3):390-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.17.9291. Epub 2008 Dec 8.
3
Preoperative assessment enables the early diagnosis and successful treatment of lymphedema.术前评估有助于淋巴水肿的早期诊断和成功治疗。
Cancer. 2008 Jun 15;112(12):2809-19. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23494.
4
Lymphedema: a comprehensive review.淋巴水肿:全面综述。
Ann Plast Surg. 2007 Oct;59(4):464-72. doi: 10.1097/01.sap.0000257149.42922.7e.
5
Reliability and limits of agreement of circumferential, water displacement, and optoelectronic volumetry in the measurement of upper limb lymphedema.上肢淋巴水肿测量中周向、水置换和光电体积测量法的可靠性及一致性界限
Lymphology. 2007 Mar;40(1):26-34.
6
Lymphedema following axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer.乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结清扫术后的淋巴水肿。
Surg Oncol. 2006 Nov;15(3):153-65. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2006.11.003. Epub 2006 Dec 21.
7
Reliability and validity of arm volume measurements for assessment of lymphedema.用于评估淋巴水肿的手臂容积测量的可靠性和有效性。
Phys Ther. 2006 Feb;86(2):205-14.
8
A comparison of four diagnostic criteria for lymphedema in a post-breast cancer population.乳腺癌患者人群中淋巴水肿四种诊断标准的比较。
Lymphat Res Biol. 2005;3(4):208-17. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2005.3.208.
9
Psychologic and social sequelae of secondary lymphedema: a review.继发性淋巴水肿的心理和社会后遗症:综述
Cancer. 2005 Aug 1;104(3):457-66. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21195.
10
Incidence and risk of arm oedema following treatment for breast cancer: a three-year follow-up study.乳腺癌治疗后手臂水肿的发生率及风险:一项三年随访研究
QJM. 2005 May;98(5):343-8. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hci053. Epub 2005 Apr 8.