University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.
Health Serv Res. 2011 Feb;46(1 Pt 1):138-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01167.x. Epub 2010 Sep 17.
To determine factors associated with selecting a high-deductible health plan (HDHP) rather than a preferred provider plan (PPO) and to examine switching and market segmentation after initial selection.
DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Claims and benefit information for 2005-2007 from nine employers in western Pennsylvania first offering HDHP in 2006.
We examined plan growth over time, used logistic regression to determine factors associated with choosing an HDHP, and examined the distribution of healthy and sick members across plan types.
We linked employees with their dependents to determine family-level variables. We extracted risk scores, covered charges, employee age, and employee gender from claims data. We determined census-level race, education, and income information.
Health status, gender, race, and education influenced the type of individual and family policies chosen. In the second year the HDHP was offered, few employees changed plans. Risk segmentation between HDHPs and PPOs existed, but it did not increase.
When given a choice, those who are healthier are more likely to select an HDHP leading to risk segmentation. Risk segmentation did not increase in the second year that HDHPs were offered.
确定选择高免赔额健康计划(HDHP)而非优选供应商计划(PPO)的相关因素,并考察初始选择后的转换和市场细分。
数据来源/研究环境:2006 年首次提供 HDHP 的宾夕法尼亚州西部的九家雇主在 2005-2007 年的索赔和福利信息。
我们考察了随时间推移的计划增长情况,使用逻辑回归确定选择 HDHP 的相关因素,并考察了不同计划类型中健康和患病成员的分布情况。
我们将员工及其家属联系起来以确定家庭层面的变量。我们从索赔数据中提取了风险评分、承保费用、员工年龄和员工性别。我们确定了人口普查层面的种族、教育和收入信息。
健康状况、性别、种族和教育程度影响了个人和家庭政策的选择类型。在提供 HDHP 的第二年,很少有员工更换计划。HDHP 和 PPO 之间存在风险细分,但并未增加。
在有选择的情况下,更健康的人更有可能选择 HDHP,从而导致风险细分。在提供 HDHP 的第二年,风险细分并未增加。