Swedish Institute for Infectious Disease Control, Department of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology (MTC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
J Microbiol Methods. 2010 Nov;83(2):224-30. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2010.09.004. Epub 2010 Sep 16.
Fast and reliable epidemiological typing methods for identifying outbreaks and epidemic strains of extended spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) producing Enterobacteriaceae are urgently needed. The DiversiLab system (DL) has been proposed for these purposes. We compared DL to pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) on a national collection of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli (n=258; of which 226 isolates were typeable with PFGE) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (n=48) isolated in 2007. For E. coli the Wallace coefficients showed that the probability of two isolates of the same DL type having the same PFGE type was only 19.8% and the probability of two isolates of the same PFGE type having the same DL type was 90.4%. For K. pneumoniae the Wallace coefficients showed that the probability of two isolates of the same DL type having the same PFGE type was 100% and the probability of two isolates of the same PFGE type having the same DL type was 79%, indicating that for this K. pneumoniae strain collection DL was slightly more discriminatory. Only four of 48 isolates had discordant results with the two methods. In E. coli 42% of the isolates were sequence type 131 and these isolates were related at >95% similarity with DL and at ≥60% similarity with PFGE. In summary, for E. coli DL performed well in identifying isolates related by PFGE, but overestimated the genetic relatedness in the studied collection. This indicates that DL could be a primary screening method for excluding unrelated isolates. Isolates shown to be related must be confirmed with a more discriminatory method. For K. pneumoniae, DL discriminated well but overestimated the diversity of the isolates compared to PFGE, assuming a risk of missing possible genetic relatedness.
快速可靠的流行病学分型方法对于鉴定产超广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)的肠杆菌科的暴发和流行株至关重要。DiversiLab 系统(DL)已被提出用于这些目的。我们将 DL 与脉冲场凝胶电泳(PFGE)在 2007 年分离的国家产 ESBL 大肠埃希菌(n=258;其中 226 株可通过 PFGE 分型)和肺炎克雷伯菌(n=48)的国家分离株进行了比较。对于大肠埃希菌,Wallace 系数表明,同一 DL 型的两个分离株具有相同 PFGE 型的概率仅为 19.8%,而具有相同 PFGE 型的两个分离株具有相同 DL 型的概率为 90.4%。对于肺炎克雷伯菌,Wallace 系数表明,同一 DL 型的两个分离株具有相同 PFGE 型的概率为 100%,而具有相同 PFGE 型的两个分离株具有相同 DL 型的概率为 79%,表明对于该肺炎克雷伯菌株系收集物,DL 具有稍高的区分能力。只有 48 株中的 4 株与两种方法的结果不一致。在大肠埃希菌中,42%的分离株为 ST131 型,这些分离株与 DL 的相似度大于 95%,与 PFGE 的相似度大于 60%。总之,对于大肠埃希菌,DL 能够很好地识别通过 PFGE 鉴定的相关分离株,但高估了研究收集物中的遗传相关性。这表明 DL 可以作为一种排除不相关分离株的初步筛选方法。显示相关的分离株必须通过更具区分能力的方法进行确认。对于肺炎克雷伯菌,DL 很好地区分了,但与 PFGE 相比,高估了分离株的多样性,这可能导致潜在的遗传相关性被遗漏。