Broad Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Nat Biotechnol. 2010 Oct;28(10):1106-14. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1681. Epub 2010 Sep 19.
DNA methylation plays a key role in regulating eukaryotic gene expression. Although mitotically heritable and stable over time, patterns of DNA methylation frequently change in response to cell differentiation, disease and environmental influences. Several methods have been developed to map DNA methylation on a genomic scale. Here, we benchmark four of these approaches by analyzing two human embryonic stem cell lines derived from genetically unrelated embryos and a matched pair of colon tumor and adjacent normal colon tissue obtained from the same donor. Our analysis reveals that methylated DNA immunoprecipitation sequencing (MeDIP-seq), methylated DNA capture by affinity purification (MethylCap-seq), reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS) and the Infinium HumanMethylation27 assay all produce accurate DNA methylation data. However, these methods differ in their ability to detect differentially methylated regions between pairs of samples. We highlight strengths and weaknesses of the four methods and give practical recommendations for the design of epigenomic case-control studies.
DNA 甲基化在调控真核基因表达中起着关键作用。尽管它在有丝分裂中具有遗传能力且随时间稳定,但 DNA 甲基化的模式经常响应于细胞分化、疾病和环境影响而发生变化。已经开发了几种方法来在基因组范围内绘制 DNA 甲基化图谱。在这里,我们通过分析来自遗传上无关的胚胎的两个人类胚胎干细胞系和来自同一供体的配对结肠肿瘤和相邻正常结肠组织,对其中的四种方法进行了基准测试。我们的分析表明,甲基化 DNA 免疫沉淀测序(MeDIP-seq)、通过亲和纯化捕获的甲基化 DNA(MethylCap-seq)、减少代表性亚硫酸氢盐测序(RRBS)和 Infinium HumanMethylation27 测定均能产生准确的 DNA 甲基化数据。然而,这些方法在检测两个样本之间的差异甲基化区域方面存在差异。我们突出了这四种方法的优缺点,并为设计表观基因组病例对照研究提供了实用建议。