Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Nat Biotechnol. 2010 Oct;28(10):1097-105. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1682. Epub 2010 Sep 19.
Analysis of DNA methylation patterns relies increasingly on sequencing-based profiling methods. The four most frequently used sequencing-based technologies are the bisulfite-based methods MethylC-seq and reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS), and the enrichment-based techniques methylated DNA immunoprecipitation sequencing (MeDIP-seq) and methylated DNA binding domain sequencing (MBD-seq). We applied all four methods to biological replicates of human embryonic stem cells to assess their genome-wide CpG coverage, resolution, cost, concordance and the influence of CpG density and genomic context. The methylation levels assessed by the two bisulfite methods were concordant (their difference did not exceed a given threshold) for 82% for CpGs and 99% of the non-CpG cytosines. Using binary methylation calls, the two enrichment methods were 99% concordant and regions assessed by all four methods were 97% concordant. We combined MeDIP-seq with methylation-sensitive restriction enzyme (MRE-seq) sequencing for comprehensive methylome coverage at lower cost. This, along with RNA-seq and ChIP-seq of the ES cells enabled us to detect regions with allele-specific epigenetic states, identifying most known imprinted regions and new loci with monoallelic epigenetic marks and monoallelic expression.
DNA 甲基化模式分析越来越依赖于基于测序的分析方法。目前最常用的四种基于测序的技术分别是亚硫酸氢盐法的 MethylC-seq 和简化代表性亚硫酸氢盐测序(RRBS),以及基于富集的甲基化 DNA 免疫沉淀测序(MeDIP-seq)和甲基化 DNA 结合结构域测序(MBD-seq)。我们应用这四种方法对人类胚胎干细胞的生物学重复样本进行了分析,以评估它们在全基因组 CpG 覆盖度、分辨率、成本、一致性以及 CpG 密度和基因组环境的影响。两种亚硫酸氢盐方法评估的甲基化水平在 CpG 上有 82%是一致的(差异未超过给定的阈值),在非 CpG 胞嘧啶上有 99%是一致的。使用二分类的甲基化调用,两种富集方法有 99%是一致的,而所有四种方法评估的区域有 97%是一致的。我们将 MeDIP-seq 与甲基化敏感限制性内切酶(MRE-seq)测序相结合,以较低的成本实现了全甲基组覆盖。这与 ES 细胞的 RNA-seq 和 ChIP-seq 一起,使我们能够检测具有等位基因特异性表观遗传状态的区域,确定了大多数已知的印记区域和具有单等位基因表观遗传标记和单等位基因表达的新基因座。