Rodger Sylvia, Clark Michele, Banks Rebecca, O'Brien Mia, Martinez Kay
Division of Occupational Therapy, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
Aust Occup Ther J. 2009 Dec;56(6):372-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1630.2009.00808.x.
BACKGROUND/AIM: A timely evaluation of the Australian Competency Standards for Entry-Level Occupational Therapists (1994) was conducted. This thorough investigation comprised a literature review exploring the concept of competence and the applications of competency standards; systematic benchmarking of the Australian Occupational Therapy Competency Standards (OT AUSTRALIA, 1994) against other national and international competency standards and other affiliated documents, from occupational therapy and other cognate disciplines; and extensive nationwide consultation with the professional community. This paper explores and examines the similarities and disparities between occupational therapy competency standards documents available in English from Australia and other countries.
An online search for national occupational therapy competency standards located 10 documents, including the Australian competencies.
Four 'frameworks' were created to categorise the documents according to their conceptual underpinnings: Technical-Prescriptive, Enabling, Educational and Meta-Cognitive. Other characteristics that appeared to impact the design, content and implementation of competency standards, including definitions of key concepts, authorship, national and cultural priorities, scope of services, intended use and review mechanisms, were revealed.
The proposed 'frameworks' and identification of influential characteristics provided a 'lens' through which to understand and evaluate competency standards. While consistent application of and attention to some of these characteristics appear to consolidate and affirm the authority of competency standards, it is suggested that the national context should be a critical determinant of the design and content of the final document. The Australian Occupational Therapy Competency Standards (OT AUSTRALIA, 1994) are critiqued accordingly, and preliminary recommendations for revision are proposed.
背景/目的:对澳大利亚入门级职业治疗师能力标准(1994年)进行了及时评估。这项全面调查包括文献综述,探讨能力概念和能力标准的应用;将澳大利亚职业治疗能力标准(澳大利亚职业治疗协会,1994年)与其他国家和国际能力标准以及职业治疗和其他相关学科的其他附属文件进行系统对标;以及在全国范围内与专业团体进行广泛磋商。本文探讨并审视了澳大利亚和其他国家以英文提供的职业治疗能力标准文件之间的异同。
通过在线搜索国家职业治疗能力标准,找到了10份文件,包括澳大利亚的能力标准。
创建了四个“框架”,根据概念基础对文件进行分类:技术规定性、赋能性、教育性和元认知性。还揭示了似乎影响能力标准设计、内容和实施的其他特征,包括关键概念的定义、作者、国家和文化优先事项、服务范围、预期用途和审查机制。
所提议的“框架”以及对有影响特征的识别提供了一个理解和评估能力标准的“视角”。虽然对其中一些特征的一致应用和关注似乎巩固并肯定了能力标准的权威性,但建议国家背景应是最终文件设计和内容的关键决定因素。据此对澳大利亚职业治疗能力标准(澳大利亚职业治疗协会,1994年)进行了批判,并提出了初步修订建议。