Letts Lori, Moreland Julie, Richardson Julie, Coman Liliana, Edwards Mary, Ginis Kathleen Martin, Wilkins Seanne, Wishart Laurie
School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Aust Occup Ther J. 2010 Feb;57(1):51-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1630.2009.00787.x.
BACKGROUND/AIM: Evidence that the physical environment is a fall risk factor in older adults is inconsistent. The study evaluated and summarised evidence of the physical environment as a fall risk factor.
Eight databases (1985-2006) were searched. Investigators evaluated quality of two categories (cross-sectional and cohort) of studies, extracted and analysed data.
Cross-sectional: falls occur in a variety of environments; gait aids were present in approximately 30% of falls.
Home hazards increased fall risk (odds ratio (OR) = 1.15; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.97-1.36) although not significantly. When only the high quality studies were included, the OR = 1.38 (95% CI: 1.03-1.87), which was statistically significant. Use of mobility aids significantly increased fall risk in community (OR = 2.07; 95% CI: 1.59-2.71) and institutional (OR = 1.77; 95% CI: 1.66-1.89) settings.
Home hazards appear to be a significant risk factor in older community-dwelling adults, although they may present the greatest risk for persons who fall repeatedly. Future research should examine relationships between mobility impairments, use of mobility aids and falls.
背景/目的:关于物理环境是老年人跌倒风险因素的证据并不一致。本研究评估并总结了物理环境作为跌倒风险因素的证据。
检索了八个数据库(1985 - 2006年)。研究人员评估了两类研究(横断面研究和队列研究)的质量,提取并分析了数据。
横断面研究:跌倒发生在各种环境中;约30%的跌倒事件中存在助行器。
家庭危险因素增加了跌倒风险(优势比(OR)= 1.15;95%置信区间(CI):0.97 - 1.36),尽管不显著。仅纳入高质量研究时,OR = 1.38(95% CI:1.03 - 1.87),具有统计学意义。在社区(OR = 2.07;95% CI:1.59 - 2.71)和机构环境(OR = 1.77;95% CI:1.66 - 1.89)中使用助行器显著增加了跌倒风险。
家庭危险因素似乎是社区居住老年人的一个重要风险因素,尽管它们可能对反复跌倒的人构成最大风险。未来的研究应探讨行动障碍、助行器使用与跌倒之间的关系。