MRC Epidemiology Unit, Institute of Metabolic Science, Addenbrookes Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, UK.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010 Sep 20;7:68. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-7-68.
Poor recognition of physical inactivity may be an important barrier to healthy behaviour change, but little is known about this phenomenon. We aimed to characterize a high-risk population according to the discrepancies between objective and self-rated physical activity (PA), defined as awareness.
An exploratory cross-sectional analysis of PA awareness using baseline data collected from 365 ProActive participants between 2001 and 2003 in East Anglia, England. Self-rated PA was defined as 'active' or 'inactive' (assessed via questionnaire). Objective PA was defined according to achievement of guideline activity levels (≥30 minutes or <30 minutes spent at least moderate intensity PA, assessed by heart rate monitoring). Four awareness groups were created: 'Realistic Actives', 'Realistic Inactives', 'Overestimators' and 'Underestimators'. Logistic regression was used to assess associations between awareness group and 17 personal, social and biological correlates.
63.3% of participants (N = 231) were inactive according to objective measurement. Of these, 45.9% rated themselves as active ('Overestimators'). In a multiple logistic regression model adjusted for age and smoking, males (OR = 2.11, 95% CI = 1.12, 3.98), those with lower BMI (OR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.84, 0.95), younger age at completion of full-time education (OR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.74, 0.93) and higher general health perception (OR = 1.02 CI = 1.00, 1.04) were more likely to overestimate their PA.
Overestimation of PA is associated with favourable indicators of relative slimness and general health. Feedback about PA levels could help reverse misperceptions.
对身体活动不足的认识不足可能是健康行为改变的一个重要障碍,但对此现象知之甚少。我们旨在根据客观和自我评估的身体活动(PA)之间的差异来描述高危人群,将这种差异定义为意识。
使用 2001 年至 2003 年在英格兰东安格利亚地区的 365 名 ProActive 参与者的基线数据进行了 PA 意识的探索性横断面分析。自我评估的 PA 定义为“活跃”或“不活跃”(通过问卷评估)。客观 PA 根据达到指导活动水平的情况来定义(通过心率监测评估,至少 30 分钟或少于 30 分钟进行至少中度强度的 PA)。创建了四个意识组:“现实活跃者”、“现实不活跃者”、“高估者”和“低估者”。使用逻辑回归评估意识组与 17 个个人、社会和生物学因素之间的关联。
根据客观测量,63.3%的参与者(N=231)不活跃。其中,45.9%的人自评为活跃(“高估者”)。在调整年龄和吸烟因素的多变量逻辑回归模型中,男性(OR=2.11,95%CI=1.12,3.98)、BMI 较低的人(OR=0.89,95%CI=0.84,0.95)、完成全日制教育年龄较小的人(OR=0.83,95%CI=0.74,0.93)和自我感知健康状况较好的人(OR=1.02,95%CI=1.00,1.04)更有可能高估自己的 PA。
高估 PA 与相对苗条和整体健康的有利指标有关。关于 PA 水平的反馈可能有助于纠正误解。