Division of Restorative and Prosthetic Dentistry, The Ohio State University College of Dentistry, 305 W. 12th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
J Dent Res. 2010 Dec;89(12):1522-7. doi: 10.1177/0022034510378012. Epub 2010 Sep 21.
Color information from different color-measuring systems varies during color matching in maxillofacial prosthetics. We studied the hypothesis that a non-contact measuring system and 4 contact color-measuring instruments perform comparably in accuracy and precision on measurements of pigmented maxillofacial elastomer specimens having human skin colors. Measurement comparisons in accuracy on opaque standard color patches were made in Phase I. In Phase II, the system with the best accuracy was used as the reference instrument, and comparisons in accuracy and precision on elastomer specimens were made. The CIEDE2000 color difference formula was used. Repeated-measures ANOVA with Tukey testing and linear regression analysis for CIELAB and color differences among the instruments were performed. The contact measuring systems perform differently in accuracy, possibly due to edge loss and other factors, but performed comparably in precision with the non-contact measuring instrument. This non-contact system is recommended for color measurement of maxillofacial prosthetic materials.
在颌面修复体的配色过程中,来自不同颜色测量系统的颜色信息会发生变化。我们研究了一个假设,即非接触式测量系统和 4 种接触式颜色测量仪器在测量具有人类肤色的着色颌面弹性体样本时,在准确性和精密度方面表现相当。在第一阶段,对不透明标准色板进行了准确性测量比较。在第二阶段,使用具有最佳准确性的系统作为参考仪器,并对弹性体样本进行了准确性和精密度的比较。使用了 CIEDE2000 色差公式。对 CIELAB 和仪器之间的颜色差异进行了重复测量方差分析和 Tukey 检验以及线性回归分析。接触式测量系统的准确性不同,可能是由于边缘损失等因素,但与非接触式测量仪器的精密度相当。建议使用这种非接触式系统来测量颌面修复材料的颜色。