Pawar Priyadarshani, Borle Anjali G, Patil Rohit M, Patil Pradnya, Pawar Vaishali M, Pachori Muskan
Department of Prosthodontics, Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital, Wardha, Maharashtra, IND.
Department of Prosthodontics, Jawahar Medical Foundation (JMF) Annasaheb Chudaman Patil Memorial (ACPM) Dental College, Dhule, IND.
Cureus. 2023 Aug 21;15(8):e43886. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43886. eCollection 2023 Aug.
Color matching of maxillofacial prostheses for the restoration of maxillofacial defects is an important factor for esthetic results. Various methods have been introduced for the accurate and reliable color matching of prostheses with the skin color of patients. A systematic review was conducted to search the existing literature on color-matching digital techniques for maxillofacial prostheses. An electronic literature search was conducted in PubMed/Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science from January 2000 to December 2022 using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Two independent reviewers conducted the search. Eight articles that fulfilled the inclusion criteria after a full-text evaluation were included in this review. Most of these studies were published in prosthodontics journals and conducted in various countries around the world. A computerized color formulation system was used in three studies; a non-contact spectroradiometer (PR 705; Photo Research Inc., Chatsworth, CA) with a Xenon arc lamp was used in two studies; a mobile phone colorimeter was used in one study; additive manufacturing of 3D facial skin with a spectrophotometer was used in one study; and a recently introduced computerized method known as e-skin (Spectromatch, Bath, UK) was used in two studies. Most of these methods were accurate in color matching, except for the additive manufacturing system, which showed less accuracy, but good repeatability. Owing to a lack of sufficient studies, no method can be labeled as the best method for color-matching maxillofacial prostheses. The latest computerized method, the e-skin, can be used to achieve better accuracy and good color matching. However, further studies are required to validate the use of e-skin for precise color matching.
颌面缺损修复中颌面修复体的颜色匹配是影响美学效果的重要因素。为使修复体颜色与患者皮肤颜色准确可靠地匹配,已引入了多种方法。本研究进行了一项系统评价,以检索有关颌面修复体颜色匹配数字技术的现有文献。使用系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,于2000年1月至2022年12月在PubMed/Medline、Scopus和Web of Science数据库中进行了电子文献检索。由两名独立的评审员进行检索。经过全文评估,有8篇符合纳入标准的文章被纳入本综述。这些研究大多发表在口腔修复学杂志上,且在世界各国开展。三项研究使用了计算机化颜色配方系统;两项研究使用了配备氙弧灯的非接触式分光辐射度计(PR 705;Photo Research Inc.,Chatsworth,CA);一项研究使用了手机色度计;一项研究使用了带有分光光度计的3D面部皮肤增材制造技术;两项研究使用了一种最近引入的名为电子皮肤(Spectromatch,英国巴斯)的计算机化方法。除增材制造系统颜色匹配准确性较低但重复性较好外,这些方法大多在颜色匹配方面较为准确。由于缺乏足够的研究,尚无一种方法可被标记为颌面修复体颜色匹配的最佳方法。最新的计算机化方法——电子皮肤,可用于实现更好的准确性和良好的颜色匹配。然而,需要进一步研究来验证电子皮肤在精确颜色匹配中的应用。