School of Dental Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia.
Division of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 29;17(8):e0273029. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273029. eCollection 2022.
The study aimed to evaluate 1) the amount of color variations presents within clinical images of maxillofacial prosthetic silicone specimens when photographed under different clinically relevant ambient lighting conditions, and 2) whether white balance calibration (WBC) methods were able to mitigate variations in ambient lighting.
432 measurements were acquired from standardized images of the pigmented prosthetic silicone specimens within different ambient lighting conditions (i.e., 2 windowed and 2 windowless clinics) at noon with no light modifying apparatus. The specimens were photographed once without any white balance calibration (raw), then independently alongside an 18% neutral gray card and Macbeth color chart for calibration in a post-processing (PPWBC) software, and once after camera calibration (CWBC) using a gray card. The LAB color values were extracted from the images and color variations (ΔE) were calculated after referring to the corresponding spectrophotometric values as control.
Images in windowless and windowed clinics exhibited highly significant differences (p < 0.001) with spectrophotometer (control). CWBC demonstrated no significant differences (p > 0.05) in LAB values across windowed clinics. PPWBC using Macbeth color chart produced no significant differences for a* values (p > 0.05) across all clinics while PPWBC by gray card showed no significant differences (p > 0.05) in LAB values when only similar clinics (either windowed or windowless) were compared.
Significant color variations were present for maxillofacial prosthetic specimens owing to natural ambient light. CWBC and PPWBC using color charts were more suitable for color correction across windowed clinics while CWBC and PPWBC using gray cards had better outcomes across windowless setups.
本研究旨在评估 1)在不同临床相关环境照明条件下拍摄颌面修复硅酮样本的临床图像时存在的颜色变化量,2)白平衡校准 (WBC) 方法是否能够减轻环境照明的变化。
在没有任何光修改设备的情况下,于中午在 2 个有窗和 2 个无窗诊所中获取不同环境照明条件下(即 2 个有窗和 2 个无窗诊所)的色素硅酮修复体样本的标准图像 432 个测量值。在没有任何白平衡校准的情况下(原始)拍摄样本一次,然后独立地与 18%中性灰卡和麦克贝斯色卡一起拍摄用于在后期处理 (PPWBC) 软件中进行校准,并在使用灰卡进行相机校准 (CWBC) 后拍摄一次。从图像中提取 LAB 颜色值,并参考相应的分光光度计值作为对照计算颜色变化 (ΔE)。
无窗和有窗诊所的图像与分光光度计(对照)存在高度显著差异(p < 0.001)。CWBC 在有窗诊所的 LAB 值中无显著差异(p > 0.05)。在所有诊所中,使用麦克贝斯色卡的 PPWBC 对 a* 值无显著差异(p > 0.05),而仅在相似的诊所(有窗或无窗)进行比较时,使用灰卡的 PPWBC 对 LAB 值无显著差异(p > 0.05)。
由于自然光,颌面修复体样本存在明显的颜色变化。CWBC 和使用色卡的 PPWBC 更适合跨有窗诊所进行颜色校正,而 CWBC 和使用灰卡的 PPWBC 则在跨无窗设置时具有更好的效果。