Defence Science & Technology Organisation, Human Protection and Performance Division, Fishermans Bend, Vic., Australia.
Br J Pharmacol. 2010 Oct;161(4):721-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.00939.x.
The use of biological agents has generally been confined to military-led conflicts. However, there has been an increase in non-state-based terrorism, including the use of asymmetric warfare, such as biological agents in the past few decades. Thus, it is becoming increasingly important to consider strategies for preventing and preparing for attacks by insurgents, such as the development of pre- and post-exposure medical countermeasures. There are a wide range of prophylactics and treatments being investigated to combat the effects of biological agents. These include antibiotics (for both conventional and unconventional use), antibodies, anti-virals, immunomodulators, nucleic acids (analogues, antisense, ribozymes and DNAzymes), bacteriophage therapy and micro-encapsulation. While vaccines are commercially available for the prevention of anthrax, cholera, plague, Q fever and smallpox, there are no licensed vaccines available for use in the case of botulinum toxins, viral encephalitis, melioidosis or ricin. Antibiotics are still recommended as the mainstay treatment following exposure to anthrax, plague, Q fever and melioidosis. Anti-toxin therapy and anti-virals may be used in the case of botulinum toxins or smallpox respectively. However, supportive care is the only, or mainstay, post-exposure treatment for cholera, viral encephalitis and ricin - a recommendation that has not changed in decades. Indeed, with the difficulty that antibiotic resistance poses, the development and further evaluation of techniques and atypical pharmaceuticals are fundamental to the development of prophylaxis and post-exposure treatment options. The aim of this review is to present an update on prophylaxis and post-exposure treatment recommendations and research initiatives for biological agents in the open literature from 2007 to 2009.
生物制剂的使用通常局限于军事主导的冲突。然而,在过去几十年中,非国家行为的恐怖主义有所增加,包括使用不对称战争,如生物制剂。因此,越来越有必要考虑防止和准备叛乱分子袭击的策略,例如开发暴露前和暴露后的医疗对策。目前正在研究广泛的预防和治疗方法来对抗生物制剂的影响。这些方法包括抗生素(用于常规和非常规用途)、抗体、抗病毒药物、免疫调节剂、核酸(类似物、反义寡核苷酸、核酶和 DNA 酶)、噬菌体治疗和微囊化。虽然有商业疫苗可预防炭疽、霍乱、鼠疫、Q 热和天花,但在出现肉毒毒素、病毒性脑炎、类鼻疽或蓖麻毒素的情况下,没有许可的疫苗可供使用。抗生素仍然被推荐作为暴露于炭疽、鼠疫、Q 热和类鼻疽后的主要治疗方法。抗毒素治疗和抗病毒药物可分别用于肉毒毒素或天花的情况。然而,对于霍乱、病毒性脑炎和蓖麻毒素,支持性护理是唯一的或主要的暴露后治疗方法——这一建议几十年来没有改变。事实上,由于抗生素耐药性带来的困难,开发和进一步评估技术和非典型药物对于预防和暴露后治疗选择的发展至关重要。本综述的目的是在 2007 年至 2009 年的开放文献中介绍生物制剂预防和暴露后治疗建议和研究计划的最新情况。