• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Involving lay and professional stakeholders in the development of a research intervention for the DEPICTED study.在 DEPICTED 研究中,让非专业人士和专业利益相关者参与研究干预措施的制定。
Health Expect. 2011 Sep;14(3):250-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00625.x. Epub 2010 Sep 23.
2
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
3
Lay and professional stakeholder involvement in scoping palliative care issues: Methods used in seven European countries.普通民众和专业利益相关者参与姑息治疗问题的界定:七个欧洲国家所采用的方法。
Palliat Med. 2017 Feb;31(2):181-192. doi: 10.1177/0269216316649154. Epub 2016 Jul 10.
4
Community engagement and involvement in Ghana: conversations with community stakeholders to inform surgical research.加纳的社区参与:与社区利益相关者的对话,为外科研究提供信息。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Jul 5;7(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00270-5.
5
Developing a video intervention to improve youth question-asking and provider education during paediatric diabetes clinic encounters: The Promoting Adolescents Communication and Engagement study.开发视频干预措施以改善儿科糖尿病诊所就诊期间青少年的提问和提供者教育:促进青少年沟通和参与研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Sep;104(9):2170-2176. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.02.021. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
6
Promoting medication adherence from the perspective of adolescent and young adult kidney transplant recipients, parents, and health care professionals: A TAKE-IT TOO study.从青少年和年轻成年肾移植受者、家长和卫生保健专业人员的角度出发促进药物依从性:TAKE-IT-TOO 研究。
Pediatr Transplant. 2020 Aug;24(5):e13709. doi: 10.1111/petr.13709. Epub 2020 May 10.
7
Patient and public involvement in data collection for health services research: a descriptive study.患者及公众参与卫生服务研究中的数据收集:一项描述性研究。
Res Involv Engagem. 2015 Aug 7;1:8. doi: 10.1186/s40900-015-0006-7. eCollection 2015.
8
Stakeholder involvement in systematic reviews: a protocol for a systematic review of methods, outcomes and effects.利益相关者参与系统评价:一项关于方法、结果和效果的系统评价方案
Res Involv Engagem. 2017 Apr 21;3:9. doi: 10.1186/s40900-017-0060-4. eCollection 2017.
9
Therapy interventions for children with neurodisabilities: a qualitative scoping study.神经发育障碍儿童的治疗干预措施:定性范围研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2018 Jan;22(3):1-150. doi: 10.3310/hta22030.
10
When participants get involved: reconsidering patient and public involvement in clinical trials at the MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL.当参与者参与进来时:重新审视伦敦大学学院医学研究委员会临床试验单位中患者及公众对临床试验的参与情况。
Trials. 2018 Feb 7;19(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2471-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Using Normalisation Process Theory to explore the contribution of stakeholder workshops to the development and refinement of a complex behavioural intervention: the STAMINA lifestyle intervention.运用规范化过程理论探讨利益相关者研讨会对复杂行为干预措施(即STAMINA生活方式干预)的开发与完善所做的贡献。
Implement Sci Commun. 2024 Sep 2;5(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s43058-024-00629-1.
2
Integration of COVID-19 and TB screening in Kampala, Uganda: healthcare provider perspectives.乌干达坎帕拉将新冠病毒病与结核病筛查相结合:医疗服务提供者的观点
Implement Sci Commun. 2023 Jan 17;4(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s43058-023-00391-w.
3
Understanding the psycho-social context for a new early intervention for resistance to change that aims to strike a beneficial balance between structure and flexibility.理解新的抗变革早期干预措施的心理社会背景,该干预措施旨在在结构和灵活性之间取得有益的平衡。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Dec 11;21(1):621. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03519-1.
4
Patients as partners in health research: A scoping review.患者作为健康研究的合作伙伴:范围综述。
Health Expect. 2021 Aug;24(4):1378-1390. doi: 10.1111/hex.13272. Epub 2021 Jun 21.
5
The "PPI Hawker": an innovative method for patient and public involvement (PPI) in health research.“患者与公众参与倡导者”:健康研究中患者及公众参与(PPI)的一种创新方法。
Res Involv Engagem. 2020 Jun 16;6:31. doi: 10.1186/s40900-020-00205-6. eCollection 2020.
6
'It just wasn't going to be heard': A mixed methods study to compare different ways of involving people with diabetes and health-care professionals in health intervention research.“根本没人会听”:一项混合方法研究,比较不同方式让糖尿病患者和医疗保健专业人员参与健康干预研究。
Health Expect. 2020 Aug;23(4):870-883. doi: 10.1111/hex.13061. Epub 2020 May 1.
7
Researchers' perspectives on public involvement in health research in Singapore: The argument for a community-based approach.研究人员对新加坡公众参与健康研究的看法:基于社区方法的论据。
Health Expect. 2019 Aug;22(4):666-675. doi: 10.1111/hex.12915. Epub 2019 Jul 19.
8
Involving the public in health research in Latin America: making the case for mental health.让拉丁美洲公众参与健康研究:以心理健康为例
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2018 May 4;42:e45. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2018.45. eCollection 2018.
9
Smartphone-Delivered Peer Physical Activity Counseling Program for Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury: Protocol for Development and Pilot Evaluation.针对脊髓损伤患者的智能手机提供的同伴身体活动咨询计划:开发与试点评估方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Mar 22;8(3):e10798. doi: 10.2196/10798.
10
Children and young people's participation in developing interventions in health and well-being: a scoping review.儿童和年轻人参与健康与福祉干预措施的制定:一项范围综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jun 28;18(1):507. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3219-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Communication skills of healthcare professionals in paediatric diabetes services.儿科糖尿病服务中医疗保健专业人员的沟通技巧。
Diabet Med. 2009 May;26(5):502-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02708.x.
2
Measuring the impact of patient and public involvement: the need for an evidence base.衡量患者和公众参与的影响:建立证据基础的必要性。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2008 Dec;20(6):373-4. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzn044. Epub 2008 Oct 3.
3
Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance.开发与评估复杂干预措施:医学研究理事会新指南
BMJ. 2008 Sep 29;337:a1655. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1655.
4
Involving consumers successfully in NHS research: a national survey.让消费者成功参与国民保健制度研究:一项全国性调查。
Health Expect. 2007 Dec;10(4):380-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00457.x.
5
Assessment of the benefits of user involvement in health research from the Warwick Diabetes Care Research User Group: a qualitative case study.沃里克糖尿病护理研究用户组对用户参与健康研究益处的评估:一项定性案例研究。
Health Expect. 2007 Sep;10(3):268-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00451.x.
6
Listening to the views of people affected by cancer about cancer research: an example of participatory research in setting the cancer research agenda.倾听癌症患者对癌症研究的看法:参与式研究在设定癌症研究议程中的一个实例
Health Expect. 2006 Mar;9(1):3-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00353.x.
7
The impact of service user involvement in research.服务使用者参与研究的影响。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv. 2005;18(2-3):103-12. doi: 10.1108/09526860510588133.
8
What does it mean to involve consumers successfully in NHS research? A consensus study.让消费者成功参与国民保健服务研究意味着什么?一项共识研究。
Health Expect. 2004 Sep;7(3):209-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2004.00278.x.
9
Involving consumers in research and development agenda setting for the NHS: developing an evidence-based approach.让消费者参与国民保健服务体系的研发议程设定:制定基于证据的方法。
Health Technol Assess. 2004 Apr;8(15):1-148, III-IV. doi: 10.3310/hta8150.
10
From passive subjects to equal partners: qualitative review of user involvement in research.从被动参与者到平等伙伴:对用户参与研究的定性综述
Br J Psychiatry. 2002 Dec;181:468-72. doi: 10.1192/bjp.181.6.468.

在 DEPICTED 研究中,让非专业人士和专业利益相关者参与研究干预措施的制定。

Involving lay and professional stakeholders in the development of a research intervention for the DEPICTED study.

机构信息

Nursing, Health and Social Care Research Centre, School of Nursing and Midwifery Studies, Cardiff University, UK.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2011 Sep;14(3):250-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00625.x. Epub 2010 Sep 23.

DOI:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00625.x
PMID:20860779
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3638343/
Abstract

AIM This paper focuses on stakeholders' active involvement at key stages of the research as members of a Stakeholder Action Group (SAG), particularly in the context of lay stakeholder involvement. Some challenges that can arise and wider issues (e.g. empowerment, the impact of user involvement) are identified and explored within the literature on service user involvement in health care research, reflecting on the implications for researchers. BACKGROUND In the DEPICTED study, lay and professional stakeholders were actively involved in developing a complex research intervention. Lay stakeholders comprised teenage and adult patients with diabetes, parents and patient organization representatives. Professional stakeholders were from a range of disciplines. METHODS Three 1-day research meetings were attended by 13-17 lay stakeholders and 10-11 professional stakeholders (plus researchers). The SAG was responsible for reviewing evidence, advising on developing ideas for the research intervention and guiding plans for evaluation of the intervention in a subsequent trial. Formal evaluations were completed by stakeholders following each SAG meeting. RESULTS  Throughout the first (developmental) stage of this two-stage study, lay and professional stakeholders participated or were actively involved in activities that provided data to inform the research intervention. Lay stakeholders identified the need for and contributed to the design of a patient-held tool, strongly influenced the detailed design and content of the research intervention and outcome questionnaire, thus making a major contribution to the trial design. CONCLUSION Stakeholders, including teenagers, can be actively involved in designing a research intervention and impact significantly on study outcomes.

摘要

目的 本文重点关注利益相关者作为利益相关者行动小组 (SAG) 的成员在研究的关键阶段的积极参与,特别是在基层利益相关者参与的背景下。在医疗保健研究中反映服务用户参与的文献中,确定并探讨了可能出现的一些挑战和更广泛的问题(例如赋权、用户参与的影响),并探讨了这些问题对研究人员的影响。

背景 在 DEPICTED 研究中,基层和专业利益相关者积极参与开发复杂的研究干预措施。基层利益相关者包括青少年和成年糖尿病患者、家长和患者组织代表。专业利益相关者来自多个学科。

方法 13-17 名基层利益相关者和 10-11 名专业利益相关者(加上研究人员)参加了 3 次为期 1 天的研究会议。SAG 负责审查证据,为研究干预措施的发展提供建议,并指导随后试验中干预措施的评估计划。每次 SAG 会议结束后,利益相关者都完成了正式评估。

结果 在这项两阶段研究的第一阶段(发展阶段)中,基层和专业利益相关者参与或积极参与了提供数据以告知研究干预措施的活动。基层利益相关者确定了需求,并为患者持有工具的设计做出了贡献,对研究干预措施和结果问卷的详细设计和内容产生了重大影响,从而对试验设计做出了重大贡献。

结论 包括青少年在内的利益相关者可以积极参与研究干预措施的设计,并对研究结果产生重大影响。