Department of Public Health, Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, 535 East 70th St, New York, NY 10021, USA.
Spine J. 2010 Oct;10(10):881-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.07.391.
Despite increasing utilization of surgical spine fusions, a paucity of literature addressing perioperative complications after revision posterior spinal fusion (RPSF) versus primary posterior spine fusion (PPSF) of the thoracic and lumbar spine exists.
To examine demographics of patients undergoing PPSF and RPSF of the thoracic and lumbar spine, assess the incidence of perioperative morbidity and mortality, and determine independent risk factors for in-hospital death.
STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Analysis of nationally representative data collected for the National Inpatient Sample (NIS).
All discharges included in the NIS with a procedure code for posterior thoracic and lumbar spine fusion from 1998 to 2006.
In-hospital mortality and morbidity.
Data collected for each year between 1998 and 2006 for the NIS were analyzed. Discharges with a procedure code for thoracic and lumbar spine fusion were included in the sample. The prevalence of patient- as well as health care-related demographics was evaluated by procedure type (primary vs. revision). Frequencies of procedure-related complications and in-hospital mortality were analyzed. Independent predictors for in-hospital mortality were determined.
We identified 222,549 PPSF and 12,474 RPSF discharges between 1998 and 2006. Patients undergoing PPSF were significantly younger (51.23 years; confidence interval [CI]=51.16, 51.31) and had lower average comorbidity indices (0.40; CI=0.39, 0.41) than those undergoing RPSF (52.69 years; CI=52.43, 52.97) and (0.44; CI=0.43, 0.45), p<.0001. The incidence of procedure-related complications was 16.02% among RPSF compared with 13.44% in PPSF patients (p<.0001). In-hospital mortality rates after PPSF were approximately twice those of RPSF (0.28% vs. 0.15%, p=.006). Adjusted risk factors for increased in-hospital mortality included PPSF compared with RPSF, male gender, and increasing age. A number of comorbidities, complications, and specific surgical indications increased the risk for perioperative death.
Despite being performed in generally younger and healthier patients and having lower perioperative morbidity, PPSF procedures are associated with increased mortality compared with RPSF procedures. The findings of this study can be used for risk stratification, accurate patient consultation, and hypothesis formation for future research.
尽管脊柱融合手术的应用日益增多,但对于胸腰椎后路翻修脊柱融合术(RPSF)与初次后路脊柱融合术(PPSF)的围手术期并发症,文献仍较少涉及。
检查胸腰椎后路初次与翻修脊柱融合术患者的人口统计学资料,评估围手术期发病率和死亡率,并确定院内死亡的独立危险因素。
研究设计/地点:对国家住院患者样本(NIS)中收集的全国代表性数据进行分析。
1998 年至 2006 年间 NIS 中包含手术编码的所有出院患者,行胸腰椎后路融合术。
院内死亡率和发病率。
分析 1998 年至 2006 年间 NIS 中每年的数据。将包含胸腰椎后路融合术手术编码的出院患者纳入样本。通过手术类型(初次与翻修)评估患者和医疗保健相关的人口统计学特征的流行情况。分析手术相关并发症和院内死亡率的频率。确定院内死亡的独立预测因素。
我们在 1998 年至 2006 年间共发现 222549 例 PPSF 和 12474 例 RPSF 出院患者。与 RPSF 相比,接受 PPSF 的患者年龄明显更小(51.23 岁;置信区间[CI]=51.16,51.31),平均合并症指数较低(0.40;CI=0.39,0.41)(52.69 岁;CI=52.43,52.97)和(0.44;CI=0.43,0.45),p<.0001。RPSF 患者手术相关并发症的发生率为 16.02%,而 PPSF 患者为 13.44%(p<.0001)。PPSF 术后院内死亡率约为 RPSF 的两倍(0.28%比 0.15%,p=.006)。增加院内死亡率的调整后危险因素包括与 RPSF 相比的 PPSF、男性和年龄增长。一些合并症、并发症和特定手术指征增加了围手术期死亡的风险。
尽管接受 PPSF 的患者通常年龄更小、更健康,且围手术期发病率较低,但与 RPSF 相比,PPSF 与更高的死亡率相关。本研究的结果可用于风险分层、对患者进行准确咨询和为未来研究形成假设。