• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种不同的脱手套方法和距离的手部污染率和环境污染水平比较。

Comparison of hand contamination rates and environmental contamination levels between two different glove removal methods and distances.

机构信息

School of Nursing, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China.

出版信息

Am J Infect Control. 2011 Mar;39(2):104-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2010.06.007. Epub 2010 Sep 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajic.2010.06.007
PMID:20869790
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7115311/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Gloves are a necessary contact precaution to prevent transmission of infectious pathogens that spread by direct or indirect contact with an infected person or a contaminated environment. This article reports a study investigating hand and environmental contamination levels when health care workers (HCWs) followed two different methods of removing gloves at two distances from the rubbish bin.

METHODS

Fifty HCWs performed a personal or causal glove removal method (pretest) and a Centers for Disease Control (CDC)-recommended glove removal method (posttest) at distances of 2 feet and 3 feet from the rubbish bin after the application of fluorescent solution (the simulated contaminant) onto their gloved hands.

RESULTS

The incidence of the small patch of fluorescent stain (<1 cm(2)) on the front of the doffed gloves was significantly lower in the posttest than in the pretest. The incidence of small and large patches (>1 cm(2)) on the front of the doffed gloves and on the cover of the rubbish bin was significantly lower at 3 feet than at 2 feet. Health care assistants had significantly higher levels of contamination than other HCWs in the pretest but not in the posttest. There was no significant difference in hand contamination rate between pretest and posttest based on distance from the rubbish bin and type of HCW.

CONCLUSION

The impact of the glove removal procedure and the distance to the bin in which used gloves are discarded should be taken into consideration on a daily basis, along with the supervision of infection control measures by minor staff.

摘要

背景

手套是预防通过直接或间接接触感染人员或受污染环境传播的传染性病原体的必要接触预防措施。本文报道了一项研究,该研究调查了当医护人员(HCW)从距离垃圾桶 2 英尺和 3 英尺的两个距离使用两种不同的脱手套方法时,手和环境的污染水平。

方法

50 名 HCW 在他们的手套上应用荧光溶液(模拟污染物)后,分别进行个人或因果手套去除方法(预测试)和疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)推荐的手套去除方法(后测试),距离垃圾桶 2 英尺和 3 英尺。

结果

与预测试相比,在后测试中,脱手套正面的小荧光斑(<1 cm(2))的发生率明显降低。脱手套正面和垃圾桶盖的小面积和大面积(>1 cm(2))的发生率在后测试中距离 3 英尺时明显低于距离 2 英尺时。在预测试中,医疗助理的污染程度明显高于其他 HCW,但在后测试中则不然。根据距离垃圾桶的距离和 HCW 的类型,预测试和后测试之间的手部污染率没有显著差异。

结论

应在日常工作中考虑手套去除程序和丢弃使用过的手套的垃圾桶的距离的影响,以及对感染控制措施的监督。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f26/7115311/42ba0e78758f/gr5_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f26/7115311/0e549984b3cf/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f26/7115311/054342c885de/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f26/7115311/6de0e35a2517/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f26/7115311/cdeef9745ab0/gr4_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f26/7115311/42ba0e78758f/gr5_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f26/7115311/0e549984b3cf/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f26/7115311/054342c885de/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f26/7115311/6de0e35a2517/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f26/7115311/cdeef9745ab0/gr4_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f26/7115311/42ba0e78758f/gr5_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of hand contamination rates and environmental contamination levels between two different glove removal methods and distances.两种不同的脱手套方法和距离的手部污染率和环境污染水平比较。
Am J Infect Control. 2011 Mar;39(2):104-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2010.06.007. Epub 2010 Sep 25.
2
Glove removal method and distance: what else can affect contamination?脱手套方法及距离:还有哪些因素会影响污染?
Am J Infect Control. 2011 Sep;39(7):611. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2010.10.025. Epub 2011 Jun 2.
3
Risk of hand or glove contamination after contact with patients colonized with vancomycin-resistant enterococcus or the colonized patients' environment.接触耐万古霉素肠球菌定植患者或其定植环境后手部或手套被污染的风险。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008 Feb;29(2):149-54. doi: 10.1086/524331.
4
Floor and environmental contamination during glove disposal.手套处理过程中的地面和环境污染。
J Hosp Infect. 2019 Mar;101(3):347-353. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2018.10.015. Epub 2018 Oct 23.
5
Modified glove use for contact precautions: Health care workers' perceptions and acceptance.改良手套在接触预防措施中的使用:医护人员的认知和接受程度。
Am J Infect Control. 2019 Aug;47(8):938-944. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2019.01.009. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
6
Impact of doffing errors on healthcare worker self-contamination when caring for patients on contact precautions.脱卸防护装备错误对接触防护患者医护人员自身污染的影响。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2019 May;40(5):559-565. doi: 10.1017/ice.2019.33. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
7
Frequent multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii contamination of gloves, gowns, and hands of healthcare workers.医护人员的手套、长袍和手上经常受到多重耐药鲍曼不动杆菌的污染。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010 Jul;31(7):716-21. doi: 10.1086/653201.
8
Glove utilization in the prevention of cross transmission: a systematic review.手套在预防交叉传播中的应用:一项系统综述。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 May 15;13(4):188-230. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1817.
9
Assessing Viral Transfer During Doffing of Ebola-Level Personal Protective Equipment in a Biocontainment Unit.评估生物安全防护单元中脱除埃博拉级个人防护装备时的病毒传播。
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Mar 5;66(6):945-949. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix956.
10
Contamination of Health Care Personnel During Removal of Personal Protective Equipment.医护人员在脱卸个人防护装备时受到污染。
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Dec;175(12):1904-10. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.4535.

引用本文的文献

1
Commentary by the Commission for Hospital Hygiene and Infection Prevention (KRINKO) on the indication-based use of disposable medical gloves in the healthcare sector.医院卫生与感染预防委员会(KRINKO)对医疗保健领域中一次性医用手套按适应症使用的评论。
GMS Hyg Infect Control. 2024 Nov 5;19:Doc55. doi: 10.3205/dgkh000510. eCollection 2024.
2
The Use of Single-Use Medical Gloves in Doctors' Practices and Hospitals.一次性医用手套在医生诊所和医院的使用。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2024 Oct 18;121(21):715-724. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2024.0159.
3
Personal protective equipment for preventing highly infectious diseases due to exposure to contaminated body fluids in healthcare staff.

本文引用的文献

1
Transmission of communicable respiratory infections and facemasks.传染性呼吸道感染的传播与口罩
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2008 May 1;1:17-27. doi: 10.2147/jmdh.s3019.
2
Detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococci on the gowns and gloves of healthcare workers.医护人员工作服和手套上耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌及耐万古霉素肠球菌的检测
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008 Jul;29(7):583-9. doi: 10.1086/588701.
3
Risk of hand or glove contamination after contact with patients colonized with vancomycin-resistant enterococcus or the colonized patients' environment.
医护人员用于预防因接触受污染体液而感染高度传染性疾病的个人防护装备。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 May 15;5(5):CD011621. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011621.pub5.
4
Personal protective equipment for preventing highly infectious diseases due to exposure to contaminated body fluids in healthcare staff.用于医护人员预防因接触受污染体液而感染高传染性疾病的个人防护装备。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 15;4(4):CD011621. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011621.pub4.
5
Development and Comparison of Complementary Methods to Study Potential Skin and Inhalational Exposure to Pathogens During Personal Protective Equipment Doffing.研究个人防护装备脱除过程中潜在皮肤和吸入性病原体暴露的补充方法的开发和比较。
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Sep 13;69(Suppl 3):S231-S240. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz616.
6
Personal protective equipment for preventing highly infectious diseases due to exposure to contaminated body fluids in healthcare staff.用于防止医护人员因接触受污染体液而感染高传染性疾病的个人防护装备。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jul 1;7(7):CD011621. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011621.pub3.
7
Self-contamination during doffing of personal protective equipment by healthcare workers to prevent Ebola transmission.医护人员脱卸个人防护装备时自我污染以防止埃博拉传播。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2018 Dec 22;7:157. doi: 10.1186/s13756-018-0433-y. eCollection 2018.
8
A pilot study to assess use of fluorescent lotion in patient care simulations to illustrate pathogen dissemination and train personnel in correct use of personal protective equipment.一项试点研究,旨在评估在患者护理模拟中使用荧光洗剂以说明病原体传播情况,并培训人员正确使用个人防护设备。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2016 Oct 20;5:40. doi: 10.1186/s13756-016-0141-4. eCollection 2016.
9
Personal protective equipment for preventing highly infectious diseases due to exposure to contaminated body fluids in healthcare staff.用于预防医护人员因接触受污染体液而感染高传染性疾病的个人防护装备。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 19;4:CD011621. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011621.pub2.
10
Environment and body contamination: a comparison of two different removal methods in three types of personal protective clothing.环境与身体污染:三种类型个人防护服中两种不同去除方法的比较
Am J Infect Control. 2014 Apr;42(4):e39-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2013.12.021.
接触耐万古霉素肠球菌定植患者或其定植环境后手部或手套被污染的风险。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008 Feb;29(2):149-54. doi: 10.1086/524331.
4
Environmental contamination makes an important contribution to hospital infection.环境污染是医院感染的一个重要成因。
J Hosp Infect. 2007 Jun;65 Suppl 2:50-4. doi: 10.1016/S0195-6701(07)60015-2.
5
In vivo protective performance of N95 respirator and surgical facemask.N95口罩和医用外科口罩的体内防护性能
Am J Ind Med. 2006 Dec;49(12):1056-65. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20395.
6
Contamination: a comparison of 2 personal protective systems.污染:两种个人防护系统的比较
CMAJ. 2006 Aug 1;175(3):249-54. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.060094.
7
Surveillance of infection control procedures in dialysis units in Japan: a preliminary study.日本透析单位感染控制程序的监测:一项初步研究。
Ther Apher Dial. 2006 Feb;10(1):78-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-9987.2006.00305.x.
8
Changes in the epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in intensive care units in US hospitals, 1992-2003.1992 - 2003年美国医院重症监护病房耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的流行病学变化
Clin Infect Dis. 2006 Feb 1;42(3):389-91. doi: 10.1086/499367. Epub 2005 Dec 19.
9
Severe acute respiratory syndrome from the trenches, at a Singapore university hospital.新加坡一家大学医院战壕中的严重急性呼吸综合征。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2004 Nov;4(11):690-6. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(04)01175-2.
10
Transmission and Control of SARS.严重急性呼吸综合征的传播与控制
Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2004 Jun;6(3):220-227. doi: 10.1007/s11908-004-0012-7.