Department of Medicine, Division of Hospital Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
J Hosp Med. 2011 Jan;6(1):37-42. doi: 10.1002/jhm.818. Epub 2010 Sep 24.
Hospitalists are increasingly involved in implementing quality improvement initiatives around patient safety, clinical informatics, and transitions of care, but may lack expertise in promoting these important interventions. Developing a sound business case is essential to garnering support and resources for any quality improvement initiative. We present a framework for developing a business case using a structured approach to exploring qualitative and quantitative costs and benefits and describe its application in the experience of developing an electronic discharge summary at the University of California San Francisco (UCSF). At our institution, we found that the primary financial benefits are the cost reductions in eliminating transcription needs and decreasing billing delays, as well as reducing the cost of tracking completion of and dissemination of discharge summaries. Costs incurred from a new information technology (IT) infrastructure, programmer time, maintenance and training must also be accounted for. While benefits may be apparent to front line providers (improved communication, efficiency of data transfer, and increased referring physician satisfaction), implementing and sustaining such an innovation depends on articulating a sound business case with a detailed cost-benefit analysis to institutional decision making.
医院医师越来越多地参与实施围绕患者安全、临床信息学和医疗转介的质量改进计划,但可能缺乏推广这些重要干预措施的专业知识。为任何质量改进计划争取支持和资源,制定一个合理的商业案例至关重要。我们提出了一个使用结构化方法来探索定性和定量成本和收益的商业案例开发框架,并描述了其在加利福尼亚大学旧金山分校(UCSF)开发电子出院总结方面的应用。在我们的机构中,我们发现主要的财务收益是消除转录需求和减少计费延迟所带来的成本降低,以及减少跟踪和分发出院总结完成情况的成本。还必须考虑新的信息技术(IT)基础设施、程序员时间、维护和培训的成本。虽然一线提供者可能明显受益(改善沟通、数据传输效率和提高转介医生满意度),但实施和维持此类创新取决于向机构决策制定者阐明具有详细成本效益分析的合理商业案例。