Bellelli Giuseppe, Buccino Giovanni, Bernardini Bruno, Padovani Alessandro, Trabucchi Marco
Geriatric Research Group, Brescia, Italy.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Oct;91(10):1489-94. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.07.013.
To assess whether action observation treatment (AOT) may also improve motor recovery in postsurgical orthopedic patients, in addition to conventional physiotherapy.
Randomized controlled trial.
Department of rehabilitation.
Patients (N=60) admitted to our department postorthopedic surgery were randomly assigned to either a case (n=30) or control (n=30) group. Exclusion criteria were age 18 years or younger and 90 years or older, Mini-Mental State Examination score of 21 of 30 or lower, no ambulating order, advanced vision impairment, malignancy, pneumonia, or heart failure.
All participants underwent conventional physiotherapy. In addition, patients in the case group were asked to observe video clips showing daily actions and to imitate them afterward. Patients in the control group were asked to observe video clips with no motor content and to execute the same actions as patients in the case group afterward. Participants were scored on functional scales at baseline and after treatment by a physician blinded to group assignment.
Changes in FIM and Tinetti scale scores, and dependence on walking aids.
At baseline, groups did not differ in clinical and functional scale scores. After treatment, patients in the case group scored better than patients in the control group (FIM total score, P=.02; FIM motor subscore, P=.001; Tinetti scale score, P=.04); patients in the case group were assigned more frequently to 1 crutch (P=.01).
In addition to conventional physiotherapy, AOT is effective in the rehabilitation of postsurgical orthopedic patients. The present results strongly support top-down effects of this treatment in motor recovery, even in nonneurologic patients.
评估动作观察疗法(AOT)除了传统物理治疗外,是否还能改善骨科术后患者的运动恢复情况。
随机对照试验。
康复科。
骨科手术后入住我科的患者(N = 60)被随机分为病例组(n = 30)或对照组(n = 30)。排除标准为年龄在18岁及以下或90岁及以上、简易精神状态检查表得分在30分中的21分及以下、无行走指令、严重视力障碍、恶性肿瘤、肺炎或心力衰竭。
所有参与者均接受传统物理治疗。此外,病例组患者被要求观看展示日常动作的视频片段,之后进行模仿。对照组患者被要求观看无运动内容的视频片段,之后执行与病例组患者相同的动作。由对分组情况不知情的医生在基线时和治疗后根据功能量表对参与者进行评分。
FIM和Tinetti量表评分的变化,以及对助行器的依赖情况。
在基线时,两组在临床和功能量表评分上无差异。治疗后,病例组患者的得分高于对照组患者(FIM总分,P = .02;FIM运动子评分,P = .001;Tinetti量表评分,P = .04);病例组患者更频繁地被分配使用单根拐杖(P = .01)。
除传统物理治疗外,动作观察疗法在骨科术后患者的康复中有效。目前的结果有力地支持了这种治疗在运动恢复中的自上而下的作用,即使在非神经科患者中也是如此。