Academic Unit of Radiology, University of Sheffield, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Glossop Rd, C Floor, Sheffield S10 2JF, England.
Radiology. 2010 Dec;257(3):802-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10092366. Epub 2010 Sep 27.
To establish whether fetal exposure to the operating noise of 1.5-T magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is associated with cochlear injury and subsequent hearing loss in neonates.
The study was performed with local research ethics committee approval and written informed parental consent. Neonatal hearing test results, including otoacoustic emission (OAE) data, were sought for all neonates delivered in Sheffield who had previously undergone in utero MR imaging between August 1999 and September 2007. The prevalence of hearing impairment in these neonates was determined, with corresponding 95% confidence intervals calculated by using the binomial exact method, and mean OAE measurements were compared with anonymized local audiometric reference data by using the t test.
One hundred three neonates who had undergone in utero MR imaging were identified; 96 of them had completed hearing screening assessment. Thirty-four of these babies were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), and one of them had bilateral hearing impairment. The prevalence of hearing impairment was 1% (one of 96; 95% confidence interval: 0.03%, 5.67%), which is in accordance with the prevalence expected, given the high proportion of babies in this study who had been in the NICU (ie, NICU graduates). In addition, for the well babies, there was no significant difference in mean OAE cochlear response compared with that for a reference data set of more than 16,000 OAE results. When NICU graduates were included in the comparison, a significant difference (P = .002) was found in one of four frequency bands used to analyze the cochlear response; however, this difference was small compared with the normal variation in OAE measurements.
The findings in this study provide some evidence that exposure of the fetus to 1.5-T MR imaging during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy is not associated with an increased risk of substantial neonatal hearing impairment.
确定胎儿在接受 1.5T 磁共振(MR)成像的操作噪声暴露后是否与新生儿耳蜗损伤及随后的听力损失有关。
本研究获得了当地研究伦理委员会的批准,并获得了书面的家长知情同意。研究人员寻找了所有在谢菲尔德分娩的新生儿的听力测试结果,包括耳声发射(OAE)数据。这些新生儿曾在 1999 年 8 月至 2007 年 9 月期间接受过宫内 MR 成像。通过使用二项式精确方法计算相应的 95%置信区间,确定这些新生儿的听力障碍患病率,并通过 t 检验将平均 OAE 测量值与匿名的本地听力参考数据进行比较。
确定了 103 名接受过宫内 MR 成像的新生儿,其中 96 名完成了听力筛查评估。这些婴儿中有 34 名被收治于新生儿重症监护病房(NICU),其中 1 名双侧听力障碍。听力障碍的患病率为 1%(96 例中的 1 例;95%置信区间:0.03%,5.67%),这与研究中 NICU 婴儿比例较高(即 NICU 毕业生)相符。此外,对于健康婴儿,其平均耳蜗 OAE 反应与超过 16000 个 OAE 结果的参考数据集无显著差异。当将 NICU 毕业生纳入比较时,在用于分析耳蜗反应的四个频带之一中发现了显著差异(P =.002);然而,与 OAE 测量的正常变化相比,这种差异很小。
本研究结果提供了一些证据,表明胎儿在妊娠第二和第三个三个月接受 1.5T MR 成像不会增加新生儿严重听力障碍的风险。