Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Mar;37(3):317-23. doi: 10.1002/uog.8844.
Autopsy is an important investigation following fetal death or termination for fetal abnormality. Postmortem magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can provide macroscopic information of comparable quality to that of conventional autopsy in the event of perinatal death. It does not provide tissue for histological examination, which may limit the quality of counseling for recurrence risks and elucidation of the cause of death. We sought to examine the comparability and clinical value of a combination of postmortem MRI and percutaneous fetal organ biopsies (minimally invasive autopsy (MIA)) with conventional fetal autopsy.
Forty-four fetuses underwent postmortem MRI and attempted percutaneous biopsy (using surface landmarks) of major fetal organs (liver, lung, heart, spleen, kidney, adrenal and thymus) following fetal death or termination for abnormality, prior to conventional autopsy, which was considered the 'gold standard'. We compared significant findings of the two examinations for both diagnostic information and clinical significance. Ancillary investigations (such as radiographs and placental histology) were regarded as common to the two forms of autopsy.
In 21 cases conventional autopsy provided superior diagnostic information to that of MIA. In two cases the MIA provided superior diagnostic information to that of conventional autopsy, when autolysis prevented detailed examination of the fetal brain. In the remaining 21 cases, conventional autopsy and MIA provided equivalent diagnostic information. With regard to clinical significance, however, in 32 (72.7%) cases, the MIA provided information of at least equivalent clinical significance to that of conventional autopsy. In no case did the addition of percutaneous biopsies reveal information of additional clinical significance.
Although in some cases MRI may provide additional information, conventional perinatal autopsy remains the gold standard for the investigation of fetal death. The utility of adding percutaneous organ biopsies, without imaging guidance, to an MRI-based fetal autopsy remains unproven. Postmortem MRI, combined with ancillary investigations such as placental histology, external examination by a pathologist, cytogenetics and plain radiography provided information of equivalent clinical significance in the majority of cases.
胎儿死亡或因胎儿异常而终止妊娠后,尸检是一项重要的调查。在围产期死亡的情况下,死后磁共振成像(MRI)可以提供与传统尸检相当的宏观信息。它不能提供组织进行组织学检查,这可能会限制对复发风险的咨询质量,并阐明死亡原因。我们试图研究在传统胎儿尸检的基础上,结合死后 MRI 和经皮胎儿器官活检(微创尸检(MIA))的组合的可比性和临床价值。
44 例胎儿在胎儿死亡或因异常终止妊娠后接受了死后 MRI 检查,并尝试进行了经皮活检(使用体表标志),对主要胎儿器官(肝、肺、心脏、脾、肾、肾上腺和胸腺)进行活检,然后进行传统尸检,后者被认为是“金标准”。我们比较了两种检查的重要发现,以比较诊断信息和临床意义。辅助检查(如 X 光片和胎盘组织学)被认为是两种尸检形式的共同特征。
在 21 例中,传统尸检提供的诊断信息优于 MIA。在 2 例中,当自溶妨碍对胎儿大脑进行详细检查时,MIA 提供的诊断信息优于传统尸检。在其余 21 例中,传统尸检和 MIA 提供了等效的诊断信息。然而,在 32 例(72.7%)中,MIA 提供的信息在至少与传统尸检相当的临床意义。在没有情况下,添加经皮活检揭示了具有额外临床意义的信息。
尽管在某些情况下 MRI 可能会提供额外的信息,但传统的围产儿尸检仍然是胎儿死亡调查的金标准。在基于 MRI 的胎儿尸检中添加无成像引导的经皮器官活检的效用尚未得到证实。尸检后 MRI 结合胎盘组织学等辅助检查、病理学家进行的外部检查、细胞遗传学和 X 光检查,在大多数情况下提供了具有同等临床意义的信息。