Riches Naomi O, Workalemahu Tsegaselassie, Johnson Erin P, Lopez Sarah, Blue Nathan, Page Jessica, Silver Robert M, Rothwell Erin
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Department of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Intermountain Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
BJOG. 2025 Apr;132(5):606-613. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.18038. Epub 2024 Dec 9.
The purpose of this study was to explore individuals' beliefs, values, and experiences surrounding stillbirth evaluation decisions.
Qualitative research.
University of Utah Health.
Parents who experienced a stillbirth in the past 5 years (n = 19) were interviewed about their experiences and decision to consent to or decline stillbirth evaluations, such as autopsy, placental histopathology, or genetic testing.
Qualitative content analysis.
Barriers and facilitators to parentsstillbirth postmortem decision-making.
Participants communicated several facilitators and barriers that contributed to their stillbirth evaluation decision. Reasons for consenting to evaluations were belief in science, background in medicine, altruism, to inform future pregnancies, thinking about preventing another stillbirth, and how patients viewed the care of their stillborn by the medical team. Reasons for declining evaluations were receiving a diagnosis prior to being offered a postmortem evaluation, intent to avoid causing further harm to the baby, interest to spend more time with their baby, and cost of the evaluation.
Stillbirth is one of the most difficult experiences of a parent. Diagnostic and emotional barriers create further challenges to decision-making for stillbirth postmortem evaluations. Parents often rely on inadequate information and personal values and beliefs during this time-sensitive decision process. Decision support for stillbirth evaluations and training for medical providers could benefit parents, may increase stillbirth evaluation uptake, and potentially prevent decisional regret.
Research reported in this publication was supported by the Utah Centre for Excellence in ELSI Research (UCEER).
本研究旨在探讨个人围绕死产评估决策的信念、价值观和经历。
定性研究。
犹他大学健康中心。
过去5年中有死产经历的父母(n = 19),就他们同意或拒绝死产评估(如尸检、胎盘组织病理学或基因检测)的经历和决定接受了访谈。
定性内容分析。
父母死产后尸检决策的障碍和促进因素。
参与者交流了几个促成他们死产评估决策的促进因素和障碍。同意评估的原因包括对科学的信仰、医学背景、利他主义、为未来怀孕提供信息、考虑预防再次死产以及患者对医疗团队对其死产儿护理的看法。拒绝评估的原因包括在接受尸检评估之前已获得诊断、有意避免对婴儿造成进一步伤害、希望多陪陪婴儿以及评估费用。
死产是为人父母最艰难的经历之一。诊断和情感障碍给死产后尸检评估的决策带来了进一步挑战。在这个对时间敏感的决策过程中,父母往往依赖不充分的信息以及个人价值观和信念。为死产评估提供决策支持以及对医疗服务提供者进行培训可能会使父母受益,可能会提高死产评估的接受率,并有可能防止决策后悔。
本出版物中报告的研究得到了犹他州ELSI研究卓越中心(UCEER)的支持。