Department of Cardiothoracic, Transplantation and Vascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Artif Organs. 2010 Sep;34(9):721-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2010.01085.x.
Patient satisfaction with left ventricular assist device (LVAD) external equipment has not yet been reported. We aimed to evaluate the quality of two different systems based on patients' perspective and its interrelationship with quality of life. Differential assessment of the HeartMate II axial flow pump (n = 17; Thoratec, Pleasanton, CA, USA) and the HVAD centrifugal pump (n = 10; HeartWare, Inc., Miramar, FL, USA) was obtained from 27 outpatients by a questionnaire 2 months to 2.9 years after device implantation. In addition, a health-related quality of life questionnaire (Short Form-36 [SF-36]) was completed. Overall patients' satisfaction was high. Severe limitations were attributed to the loudness of the power base unit in HeartMate II patients (P = 0.00), and HVAD patients were dissatisfied by the length of the driveline (P = 0.02). Between HVAD and HeartMate II patients, no significant differences in the quality of life (assessed by SF-36) were reported. While the overall satisfaction of outpatients on LVAD support was high, differences between the systems were found. Patients' perspectives may have an important impact on future modification of external components. Ultimately, this may also contribute to an improvement in the quality of life of chronic LVAD patients.
患者对左心室辅助装置(LVAD)外部设备的满意度尚未得到报道。我们旨在根据患者的观点评估两种不同系统的质量及其与生活质量的相互关系。通过问卷调查,对 27 名接受 HeartMate II 轴流泵(n = 17;Thoratec,加利福尼亚州普莱森顿)和 HVAD 离心泵(n = 10;HeartWare,Inc.,佛罗里达州米拉马尔)治疗的患者进行了 2 个月至 2.9 年的设备植入后评估。此外,还完成了健康相关生活质量问卷(SF-36)。患者总体满意度较高。HeartMate II 患者的电源底座噪音过大(P = 0.00),严重限制了患者的生活,而 HVAD 患者对电缆长度不满意(P = 0.02)。HVAD 和 HeartMate II 患者之间的生活质量(通过 SF-36 评估)无显著差异。尽管 LVAD 支持的门诊患者总体满意度较高,但发现系统之间存在差异。患者的观点可能对未来外部组件的改进有重要影响。最终,这也可能有助于提高慢性 LVAD 患者的生活质量。