Suppr超能文献

糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)和平均血糖与心血管疾病危险因素的相关性强于餐后血糖或糖尿病患者的血糖变异性:A1C 衍生平均血糖(ADAG)研究。

HbA₁(c) and mean blood glucose show stronger associations with cardiovascular disease risk factors than do postprandial glycaemia or glucose variability in persons with diabetes: the A1C-Derived Average Glucose (ADAG) study.

机构信息

Steno Diabetes Center A/S, Gentofte, Denmark.

出版信息

Diabetologia. 2011 Jan;54(1):69-72. doi: 10.1007/s00125-010-1918-2. Epub 2010 Oct 1.

Abstract

AIMS

Increased glucose excursions and postprandial hyperglycaemia have been suggested as unique risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality in patients with diabetes mellitus. Much of the evidence is based on a single 2 h glucose value after oral glucose tolerance testing in epidemiological studies. We examined the association between various indices of glycaemia measured during everyday activities and metabolic CVD risk factors in the A1C-Derived Average Glucose (ADAG) study.

METHODS

Participants (268 with type 1 diabetes, 159 with type 2 diabetes) completed 16 weeks of intensive continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG). From these data, common indices of postprandial glycaemia, overall hyperglycaemia, glucose variability and HbA₁(c) were derived. The associations between glycaemic indices and known CVD risk factors (lipids, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and blood pressure) were explored in linear regression models.

RESULTS

For both diabetes types, the overall strongest associations with CVD risk factors were seen for the measures of average glycaemia (mean blood glucose and HbA₁(c)). Associations between self-monitored postprandial and fasting glucose and CVD risk factors were weaker, but significant. Measurements of blood glucose variability showed non-significant associations. Overall, calculations based on CGM were not more informative than those based on frequent SMBG.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Mean glycaemia and HbA₁(c) show consistent and stronger associations with CVD risk factors than fasting glucose or postprandial glucose levels or measures of glucose variability in patients with diabetes.

摘要

目的

高血糖波动和餐后高血糖已被认为是糖尿病患者发生心血管疾病(CVD)和死亡的独特危险因素。这些证据主要基于流行病学研究中口服葡萄糖耐量试验后单次 2 小时血糖值。我们在 A1C 衍生平均血糖(ADAG)研究中检查了日常活动中测量的各种血糖指标与代谢性 CVD 危险因素之间的关系。

方法

参与者(268 例 1 型糖尿病,159 例 2 型糖尿病)完成了 16 周的强化连续血糖监测(CGM)和自我血糖监测(SMBG)。根据这些数据,得出了常见的餐后血糖、总体高血糖、血糖变异性和 HbA₁(c)指数。在线性回归模型中探讨了血糖指标与已知 CVD 危险因素(血脂、高敏 C 反应蛋白和血压)之间的关系。

结果

对于两种类型的糖尿病,与 CVD 危险因素的总体最强关联见于平均血糖(平均血糖和 HbA₁(c))的测量值。自我监测的餐后和空腹血糖与 CVD 危险因素之间的关联较弱,但仍有统计学意义。血糖变异性的测量值显示出无统计学意义的关联。总体而言,基于 CGM 的计算并不比基于频繁 SMBG 的计算更具信息量。

结论/解释:在糖尿病患者中,平均血糖和 HbA₁(c)与 CVD 危险因素的关联比空腹血糖或餐后血糖水平或血糖变异性的测量值更一致且更强。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83dd/2995856/e85ce6cbb287/125_2010_1918_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验