Suppr超能文献

评估正常胸椎和骨质疏松性胸椎后路内固定系统的拔出强度和失败机制。

Evaluation of pullout strength and failure mechanism of posterior instrumentation in normal and osteopenic thoracic vertebrae.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hellenic Air Force Hospital, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

J Neurosurg Spine. 2010 Oct;13(4):469-76. doi: 10.3171/2010.4.SPINE09764.

Abstract

OBJECT

There is limited data on the pullout strength of spinal fixation devices in the thoracic spine among individuals with different bone quality. An in vitro biomechanical study on the thoracic spine was performed to compare the pullout strength and the mechanism of failure of 4 posterior fixation thoracic constructs in relation to bone mineral density (BMD).

METHODS

A total of 80 vertebrae from 11 fresh-frozen thoracic spines (T2-12) were used. Based on the results from peripheral quantitative CT, specimens were divided into 2 groups (normal and osteopenic) according to their BMD. They were then randomly assigned to 1 of 4 different instrumentation systems (sublaminar wires, pedicle screws, lamina claw hooks, or pedicle screws with wires). The construct was completed with 2 titanium rods and 2 transverse connectors, creating a stable frame. The pullout force to failure perpendicular to the rods as well as the pattern of fixation failure was recorded.

RESULTS

Mean pullout force in the osteopenic Group A (36 vertebrae) was 473.2 ± 179.2 N and in the normal BMD Group B (44 vertebrae) was 1414.5 ± 554.8 N. In Group A, no significant difference in pullout strength was encountered among the different implants (p = 0.96). In Group B, the hook system failed because of dislocation with significantly less force than the other 3 constructs (931.9 ± 345.1 N vs an average of 1538.6 ± 532.7 N; p = 0.02). In the osteopenic group, larger screws demonstrated greater resistance to pullout (p = 0.011). The most common failure mechanism in both groups was through pedicle base fracture.

CONCLUSIONS

Bone quality is an important factor that influences stability of posterior thoracic implants. Fixation strength in the osteopenic group was one-fourth of the value measured in vertebrae with good bone quality, irrespective of the instrumentation used. However, in normal bone quality vertebrae, the lamina hook claw system dislocated with significantly less force when compared with other spinal implants. Further studies are needed to investigate the impact of different transpedicular screw designs on the pullout strength in normal and osteopenic thoracic spines.

摘要

目的

目前关于不同骨质量人群胸段脊柱内固定装置拔出强度的数据有限。本研究通过对胸段脊柱进行体外生物力学研究,比较 4 种后路固定胸段脊柱结构与骨密度(BMD)的关系,分析其拔出强度和失败机制。

方法

本研究共使用 11 个新鲜冷冻胸段脊柱(T2-12)的 80 个椎体。根据外周定量 CT 的结果,根据 BMD 将标本分为 2 组(正常和骨质疏松)。然后将它们随机分配到 4 种不同的器械系统(板层下钢丝、椎弓根螺钉、椎板钩爪或椎弓根螺钉加钢丝)之一。用 2 个钛棒和 2 个横向连接器完成构建,形成稳定的框架。记录垂直于棒材的拔出力和固定失败的模式。

结果

骨质疏松 A 组(36 个椎体)的平均拔出力为 473.2 ± 179.2 N,正常 BMD B 组(44 个椎体)为 1414.5 ± 554.8 N。在 A 组中,不同植入物的拔出强度无显著差异(p = 0.96)。在 B 组中,钩系统因脱位而失效,其拔出力明显小于其他 3 种构建物(931.9 ± 345.1 N 与平均 1538.6 ± 532.7 N;p = 0.02)。在骨质疏松组中,较大的螺钉表现出更大的抗拔出力(p = 0.011)。两组最常见的失败机制均为椎弓根基底骨折。

结论

骨质量是影响后路胸段脊柱内固定稳定性的重要因素。骨质疏松组的固定强度仅为骨质量良好椎体的四分之一,与使用的器械无关。然而,在正常骨质量的椎体中,与其他脊柱植入物相比,椎板钩爪系统脱位所需的力明显较小。需要进一步研究不同经椎弓根螺钉设计对正常和骨质疏松性胸段脊柱拔出强度的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验