Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2011 Apr;40(5):389-97. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2010.06.006.
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Carotid intima media thickness (cIMT) is frequently used to identify populations at elevated cardiovascular risk. A systematic literature search and meta-analysis were performed to evaluate cIMT difference between RA and controls.
The literature was screened to identify all available studies comparing cIMT in RA patients and controls. Random effects meta-analysis was performed to estimate the overall mean cIMT difference between both groups. Meta-regression was performed to assess the influence of age and the degree of comparability regarding established cardiovascular risk factors on cIMT difference. Potential publication bias was examined by a funnel plot and Egger test.
From 22 studies, cIMT data were available from 1384 RA patients and 1147 controls. In 17 of the studies, RA patients had a statistically significantly greater cIMT. The overall mean cIMT difference was 0.09 mm (95%CI: 0.07-0.11 mm). Heterogeneity was observed (I(2) 72.5%, P < 0.001). A likely source of heterogeneity was the difference in cardiovascular risk factors between RA patients and controls at baseline, but not age. The funnel plot did not show a skewed or asymmetrical shape, which was supported by the Egger's test (P = 0.87).
Our observations support the current evidence base for an increased cardiovascular burden in RA and support the use of cIMT in observational studies in RA patients. The next step is to determine its utility as a surrogate cardiovascular risk marker in RA in prospective studies.
类风湿关节炎(RA)与心血管疾病风险增加相关。颈动脉内膜中层厚度(cIMT)常用于识别心血管风险升高的人群。进行了系统的文献检索和荟萃分析,以评估 RA 患者和对照组之间的 cIMT 差异。
筛选文献以确定所有比较 RA 患者和对照组 cIMT 的可用研究。采用随机效应荟萃分析估计两组之间的总体平均 cIMT 差异。进行荟萃回归分析,以评估年龄和与既定心血管危险因素的可比性程度对 cIMT 差异的影响。通过漏斗图和 Egger 检验检查潜在的发表偏倚。
从 22 项研究中,有 1384 名 RA 患者和 1147 名对照者可获得 cIMT 数据。在 17 项研究中,RA 患者的 cIMT 统计学上显著更高。总体平均 cIMT 差异为 0.09mm(95%CI:0.07-0.11mm)。存在异质性(I²72.5%,P<0.001)。异质性的一个可能来源是 RA 患者和对照组之间基线时心血管危险因素的差异,但不是年龄。漏斗图没有显示出倾斜或不对称的形状,这得到了 Egger 检验(P=0.87)的支持。
我们的观察结果支持 RA 患者心血管负担增加的当前证据基础,并支持在 RA 患者的观察性研究中使用 cIMT。下一步是在前瞻性研究中确定其作为 RA 替代心血管风险标志物的效用。