Suppr超能文献

测量和预防可避免的医院再入院率:文献回顾。

Measuring and preventing potentially avoidable hospital readmissions: a review of the literature.

机构信息

School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.

出版信息

Hong Kong Med J. 2010 Oct;16(5):383-9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To review literature identifying key components for measuring avoidable readmissions, their prevalence, risk factors, and interventions that can reduce potentially avoidable readmissions.

DATA SOURCES AND EXTRACTION

Literature search using Medline, PubMed and the Cochrane Library up to June 2010, using the terms "avoidable", "preventable", "unplanned", "unnecessary", "readmission", and "rehospitalization".

STUDY SELECTION

A total of 48 original papers and review articles were selected for inclusion in this review.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Although hospital readmission seemed to be a term commonly used as an outcome indicator in many studies, it is difficult to make valid comparison of results from different studies. This is because the definitions of terms, methods of data collection, and approaches to data analysis differ greatly. The following criteria for studying hospital readmissions have been recommended: (a) identify hospital admissions and define relevant terms, (b) establish a clinical diagnosis for a readmission; (c) establish the purpose for a readmission, (d) set a discharge-to-readmission timeframe, and (e) identify the sources of information for assessing readmissions. Studies to identify avoidable readmissions usually involve medical records and chart reviews by clinicians using the classification scheme developed by the authors. The proportion of all readmissions assessed as preventable varies from 9 to 59% depending on the population of patients studied, duration of follow-up, type and methodology of the study and case-mix-related factors. A number of studies classified risk factors for readmission into four categories: patient, social, clinical, and system factors. Home-based interventions, intensive education/counselling, multidisciplinary care approaches, and telephone follow-up were the main types of interventions to address potentially avoidable readmissions.

CONCLUSIONS

A standard instrument to identify avoidable readmission is important in enabling valid comparisons within the system and at different timelines, so as to permit robust evaluation of interventions. The assessment of preventable risk factors for readmissions also provides a basis for designing and implementing intervention programmes.

摘要

目的

综述文献,明确可用于测量可避免再入院的关键指标,评估其发生率、危险因素以及降低潜在可避免再入院的干预措施。

资料来源与提取

使用 Medline、PubMed 和 Cochrane Library 进行文献检索,检索词为“可避免的”、“可预防的”、“计划外的”、“不必要的”、“再入院”和“再住院”,检索时间截至 2010 年 6 月。

研究选择

共纳入 48 篇原始论文和综述文章进行分析。

综合分析

尽管医院再入院似乎是许多研究中常用的结局指标,但由于不同研究中术语的定义、数据收集方法和数据分析方法差异较大,使得不同研究结果难以进行有效的比较。有学者建议研究医院再入院应遵循以下标准:(a)确定入院并定义相关术语;(b)确定再入院的临床诊断;(c)明确再入院的目的;(d)设定出院至再入院的时间框架;(e)确定评估再入院的信息来源。研究可避免再入院通常涉及临床医生使用作者制定的分类方案对病历和图表进行回顾。根据研究人群、随访时间、研究类型和方法以及与病例组合相关的因素不同,评估为可预防的再入院比例从 9%至 59%不等。许多研究将再入院的危险因素分为四类:患者、社会、临床和系统因素。家庭干预、强化教育/咨询、多学科护理方法和电话随访是处理潜在可避免再入院的主要干预措施。

结论

制定识别可避免再入院的标准工具,对于在系统内和不同时间范围内进行有效的比较,从而对干预措施进行稳健的评估非常重要。评估再入院的可预防危险因素也为设计和实施干预方案提供了依据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验