Suppr超能文献

通过使用各种血小板功能测试来确定冠心病患者中阿司匹林和氯吡格雷抵抗的患病率。

Determination of the prevalence of aspirin and clopidogrel resistances in patients with coronary artery disease by using various platelet-function tests.

作者信息

Woo Kwang-Sook, Kim Bo-Ram, Kim Ji-Eun, Goh Ri-Young, Yu Long-Hao, Kim Moo-Hyun, Han Jin-Yeong

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.

出版信息

Korean J Lab Med. 2010 Oct;30(5):460-8. doi: 10.3343/kjlm.2010.30.5.460.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dual therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel has emerged as the gold standard therapy for patients treated with drug-eluting stents (DES). However, there is variability in patients' responses to this antiplatelet therapy, and some patients continue to show ischemic recurrences after therapy. The purpose of the study was to compare the simultaneously obtained results of various platelet-function tests for assessing the prevalence of antiplatelet resistance in coronary artery disease patients undergoing DES therapy.

METHODS

A total of 66 patients were administered a loading dose of aspirin, clopidogrel, and cilostazol at least 12 hr before stenting. The results of VerifyNow (Accumetrics, USA), multiplate analyzer (Dynabyte Medical, Germany), and vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein/P2Y12 (Biocytex, France) assays were compared with those of light transmission aggregometry (LTA) analysis.

RESULTS

The P2Y12 reaction units and P2Y12% inhibition values obtained using the VerifyNow assay showed strong correlation (r) with the results of the LTA analysis. All tests results showed low concordance in defining the antiplatelet resistance in patients, and the degrees of agreement were as follows: 0 for aspirin reaction units; 0.25, P2Y12% inhibition; 0, aspirin-sensitive patients' identification test; 0.21, ADPtest; and 0.14, platelet reactivity index, expressed as the κ statistics. The prevalence of aspirin and clopidogrel resistances in patients resulted in remarkable variations, from 0% to 22.7% and from 9.1% to 48.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical usefulness of the different assays for the correct classification of patients in terms of antiplatelet resistance remains unclear. Further studies are required to determine the best method for correlating the occurrences of adverse ischemic events.

摘要

背景

阿司匹林和氯吡格雷双重疗法已成为接受药物洗脱支架(DES)治疗患者的金标准疗法。然而,患者对这种抗血小板治疗的反应存在差异,一些患者在治疗后仍会出现缺血复发。本研究的目的是比较同时获得的各种血小板功能测试结果,以评估接受DES治疗的冠心病患者中抗血小板抵抗的发生率。

方法

总共66例患者在支架置入前至少12小时给予阿司匹林、氯吡格雷和西洛他唑负荷剂量。将VerifyNow(美国Accumetrics公司)、多电极血小板聚集分析仪(德国Dynabyte Medical公司)和血管扩张剂刺激磷蛋白/P2Y12(法国Biocytex公司)检测的结果与光透射聚集法(LTA)分析的结果进行比较。

结果

使用VerifyNow检测获得的P2Y12反应单位和P2Y12%抑制值与LTA分析结果显示出强相关性(r)。所有测试结果在定义患者抗血小板抵抗方面的一致性较低,一致性程度如下:阿司匹林反应单位为0;P2Y12%抑制为0.25;阿司匹林敏感患者识别测试为0;ADP测试为0.21;血小板反应性指数为0.14,以κ统计量表示。患者中阿司匹林和氯吡格雷抵抗的发生率差异显著,分别为0%至22.7%和9.1%至48.5%。

结论

不同检测方法在根据抗血小板抵抗正确分类患者方面的临床实用性仍不明确。需要进一步研究以确定与不良缺血事件发生相关的最佳方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验