• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过使用各种血小板功能测试来确定冠心病患者中阿司匹林和氯吡格雷抵抗的患病率。

Determination of the prevalence of aspirin and clopidogrel resistances in patients with coronary artery disease by using various platelet-function tests.

作者信息

Woo Kwang-Sook, Kim Bo-Ram, Kim Ji-Eun, Goh Ri-Young, Yu Long-Hao, Kim Moo-Hyun, Han Jin-Yeong

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.

出版信息

Korean J Lab Med. 2010 Oct;30(5):460-8. doi: 10.3343/kjlm.2010.30.5.460.

DOI:10.3343/kjlm.2010.30.5.460
PMID:20890076
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dual therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel has emerged as the gold standard therapy for patients treated with drug-eluting stents (DES). However, there is variability in patients' responses to this antiplatelet therapy, and some patients continue to show ischemic recurrences after therapy. The purpose of the study was to compare the simultaneously obtained results of various platelet-function tests for assessing the prevalence of antiplatelet resistance in coronary artery disease patients undergoing DES therapy.

METHODS

A total of 66 patients were administered a loading dose of aspirin, clopidogrel, and cilostazol at least 12 hr before stenting. The results of VerifyNow (Accumetrics, USA), multiplate analyzer (Dynabyte Medical, Germany), and vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein/P2Y12 (Biocytex, France) assays were compared with those of light transmission aggregometry (LTA) analysis.

RESULTS

The P2Y12 reaction units and P2Y12% inhibition values obtained using the VerifyNow assay showed strong correlation (r) with the results of the LTA analysis. All tests results showed low concordance in defining the antiplatelet resistance in patients, and the degrees of agreement were as follows: 0 for aspirin reaction units; 0.25, P2Y12% inhibition; 0, aspirin-sensitive patients' identification test; 0.21, ADPtest; and 0.14, platelet reactivity index, expressed as the κ statistics. The prevalence of aspirin and clopidogrel resistances in patients resulted in remarkable variations, from 0% to 22.7% and from 9.1% to 48.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical usefulness of the different assays for the correct classification of patients in terms of antiplatelet resistance remains unclear. Further studies are required to determine the best method for correlating the occurrences of adverse ischemic events.

摘要

背景

阿司匹林和氯吡格雷双重疗法已成为接受药物洗脱支架(DES)治疗患者的金标准疗法。然而,患者对这种抗血小板治疗的反应存在差异,一些患者在治疗后仍会出现缺血复发。本研究的目的是比较同时获得的各种血小板功能测试结果,以评估接受DES治疗的冠心病患者中抗血小板抵抗的发生率。

方法

总共66例患者在支架置入前至少12小时给予阿司匹林、氯吡格雷和西洛他唑负荷剂量。将VerifyNow(美国Accumetrics公司)、多电极血小板聚集分析仪(德国Dynabyte Medical公司)和血管扩张剂刺激磷蛋白/P2Y12(法国Biocytex公司)检测的结果与光透射聚集法(LTA)分析的结果进行比较。

结果

使用VerifyNow检测获得的P2Y12反应单位和P2Y12%抑制值与LTA分析结果显示出强相关性(r)。所有测试结果在定义患者抗血小板抵抗方面的一致性较低,一致性程度如下:阿司匹林反应单位为0;P2Y12%抑制为0.25;阿司匹林敏感患者识别测试为0;ADP测试为0.21;血小板反应性指数为0.14,以κ统计量表示。患者中阿司匹林和氯吡格雷抵抗的发生率差异显著,分别为0%至22.7%和9.1%至48.5%。

结论

不同检测方法在根据抗血小板抵抗正确分类患者方面的临床实用性仍不明确。需要进一步研究以确定与不良缺血事件发生相关的最佳方法。

相似文献

1
Determination of the prevalence of aspirin and clopidogrel resistances in patients with coronary artery disease by using various platelet-function tests.通过使用各种血小板功能测试来确定冠心病患者中阿司匹林和氯吡格雷抵抗的患病率。
Korean J Lab Med. 2010 Oct;30(5):460-8. doi: 10.3343/kjlm.2010.30.5.460.
2
Temporal variability in the antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel and aspirin after elective drug-eluting stent implantation. An ADAPT-DES substudy.择期药物洗脱支架植入术后氯吡格雷和阿司匹林抗血小板作用的时间变异性。一项ADAPT-DES子研究。
Thromb Haemost. 2015 Nov;114(5):1020-7. doi: 10.1160/TH15-03-0257. Epub 2015 Aug 13.
3
Is There an Ideal Level of Platelet P2Y12-Receptor Inhibition in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention?: "Window" Analysis From the ADAPT-DES Study (Assessment of Dual AntiPlatelet Therapy With Drug-Eluting Stents).经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者血小板 P2Y12 受体抑制的理想水平是多少?:来自 ADAPT-DES 研究(药物洗脱支架双联抗血小板治疗评估)的“窗口”分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Dec 28;8(15):1978-1987. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.08.032.
4
Cigarette smoking is associated with a dose-response effect in clopidogrel-treated patients with diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease: results of a pharmacodynamic study.吸烟与糖尿病合并冠心病患者氯吡格雷治疗的剂量反应效应相关:药效学研究结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Mar;5(3):293-300. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.09.027.
5
Adding cilostazol to dual antiplatelet therapy achieves greater platelet inhibition than high maintenance dose clopidogrel in patients with acute myocardial infarction: Results of the adjunctive cilostazol versus high maintenance dose clopidogrel in patients with AMI (ACCEL-AMI) study.在急性心肌梗死患者中,添加西洛他唑进行双联抗血小板治疗比高维持剂量氯吡格雷实现更大的血小板抑制:辅助性西洛他唑与急性心肌梗死患者高维持剂量氯吡格雷(ACCEL-AMI)研究的结果。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Feb 1;3(1):17-26. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.109.880179. Epub 2010 Jan 26.
6
Platelet inhibition by adjunctive cilostazol suppresses the frequency of cerebral ischemic lesions after carotid artery stenting in patients with carotid artery stenosis.在颈动脉狭窄患者中,辅助西洛他唑抑制血小板抑制作用可减少颈动脉支架置入术后脑缺血性病变的发生频率。
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Mar;59(3):761-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.09.011. Epub 2013 Nov 14.
7
Multicenter randomized trial evaluating the efficacy of cilostazol on ischemic vascular complications after drug-eluting stent implantation for coronary heart disease: results of the CILON-T (influence of CILostazol-based triple antiplatelet therapy ON ischemic complication after drug-eluting stenT implantation) trial.多中心随机试验评估西洛他唑在冠心病药物洗脱支架置入后缺血性血管并发症中的疗效:CILON-T(西洛他唑三联抗血小板治疗对药物洗脱支架置入后缺血性并发症的影响)试验结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Jan 18;57(3):280-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.08.631.
8
Prevalence of ex vivo high on-treatment platelet reactivity on antiplatelet therapy after transient ischemic attack or ischemic stroke on the PFA-100(®) and VerifyNow(®).经皮腔内血管成形术和 VerifyNow(®)检测短暂性脑缺血发作或缺血性脑卒中后抗血小板治疗中 ex vivo 高反应性血小板的发生率。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013 Oct;22(7):e84-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2012.07.012. Epub 2012 Sep 13.
9
Response to antiplatelet therapy is independent of endogenous thrombin generation potential.抗血小板治疗反应独立于内源性凝血酶生成潜能。
Thromb Res. 2013 Jul;132(1):e24-30. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2013.04.008. Epub 2013 Apr 25.
10
Poor agreement between light transmission aggregometry, Verify Now P2Y₁₂ and vasodilatator-stimulated phosphoprotein for clopidogrel low-response assessment: a potential explanation of negative results of recent randomized trials.光透射聚集法、Verify Now P2Y₁₂检测法和血管舒张刺激磷蛋白检测法在评估氯吡格雷低反应性方面的一致性较差:对近期随机试验阴性结果的一种可能解释。
Platelets. 2014;25(7):499-505. doi: 10.3109/09537104.2013.840363. Epub 2013 Oct 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Endothelial dysfunction and platelet hyperactivity in type 2 diabetes mellitus: molecular insights and therapeutic strategies.2 型糖尿病中的血管内皮功能障碍和血小板高反应性:分子见解和治疗策略。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2018 Aug 31;17(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12933-018-0763-3.
2
Platelet Activation: The Mechanisms and Potential Biomarkers.血小板活化:机制与潜在生物标志物
Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:9060143. doi: 10.1155/2016/9060143. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
3
Platelet function tests: a review of progresses in clinical application.血小板功能检测:临床应用进展综述。
Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:456569. doi: 10.1155/2014/456569. Epub 2014 May 8.
4
A comparison of INNOVANCE® PFA P2Y and VerifyNow P2Y12 assay for the assessment of clopidogrel resistance in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者中评估氯吡格雷抵抗的 INNOVANCE® PFA P2Y 和 VerifyNow P2Y12 检测的比较。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2012 Jul;26(4):262-6. doi: 10.1002/jcla.21515.
5
Impact of platelet function test on platelet responsiveness and clinical outcome after coronary stent implantation: platelet responsiveness and clinical outcome.血小板功能检测对冠状动脉支架植入术后血小板反应性和临床结局的影响:血小板反应性和临床结局。
Korean Circ J. 2012 Jun;42(6):382-9. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2012.42.6.382. Epub 2012 Jun 28.
6
Paraoxonase 1 (PON1) gene variants are not associated with clopidogrel response.对氧磷酶 1(PON1)基因变异与氯吡格雷反应无关。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Oct;90(4):568-74. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2011.194. Epub 2011 Aug 31.