Mikumo M
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Letters, Konan Women's University, Kobe.
Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 1990 Dec;61(5):291-8. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.61.291.
This experiment was attempted to investigate the strategies of pitch coding in melody processing. Twenty-six musically trained and twenty-six musically naive subjects were instructed to make recognition for melodies after a 12-s retention interval, during which four conditions of interference (i.e. pause, interfering melody, nonsense syllables, musical note names) were interpolated. Both the standard and comparison melodies were 6-tone sequences which composed of high-tonality structure or low-tonality structure. It was found that the recognition of musicians was severely disrupted by the "note names" under a tonal melody, while it was disrupted by "interfering melody" under an atonal melody. On the other hand, the recognition of non-musicians was significantly worse than musicians, and there were no significant differences in disruptive effects between the interferences. These findings suggest that musicians could used verbal (note names) coding strategy for tonal melody and sensory pitch coding strategies (ex. humming, whistling) for atonal melody, but that non-musicians could not use any effective strategies for melody coding. Results were also discussed in relation to contour and pitch of melodies.
本实验旨在探究旋律处理中音调编码的策略。26名受过音乐训练的受试者和26名未受过音乐训练的受试者被要求在12秒的保留间隔后对旋律进行识别,在此期间插入了四种干扰条件(即停顿、干扰旋律、无意义音节、音符名称)。标准旋律和比较旋律均为6音序列,由高音调结构或低音调结构组成。研究发现,在调性旋律下,音乐家的识别受到“音符名称”的严重干扰,而在无调性旋律下,受到“干扰旋律”的干扰。另一方面,未受过音乐训练的受试者的识别明显比音乐家差,并且干扰之间的干扰效果没有显著差异。这些发现表明,音乐家在处理调性旋律时可以使用言语(音符名称)编码策略,而在处理无调性旋律时可以使用感官音调编码策略(如哼唱、吹口哨),但未受过音乐训练的受试者在旋律编码方面无法使用任何有效策略。研究结果还结合旋律的轮廓和音高进行了讨论。