• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心理门诊患者体验问卷(POPEQ)的 Rasch 分析。

Rasch analysis of the Psychiatric Out-Patient Experiences Questionnaire (POPEQ).

机构信息

Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Sep 28;10:282. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-282.

DOI:10.1186/1472-6963-10-282
PMID:20920164
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2955020/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Psychiatric Out-Patient Experiences Questionnaire (POPEQ) is an 11-item core measure of psychiatric out-patients experiences of the perceived outcome of the treatment, the quality of interaction with the clinician, and the quality of information provision. The POPEQ was found to have evidence for reliability and validity following the application of classical test theory but has not previously been assessed by Rasch analysis.

METHODS

Two national postal surveys of psychiatric outpatients took place in Norway in 2004 and 2007. The performance of the POPEQ, including item functioning and differential item functioning, was assessed by Rasch analysis. Principal component analysis of item residuals was used to assess the presence of subdimensions.

RESULTS

6,677 (43.3%) and 11,085 (35.2%) psychiatric out patients responded to the questionnaire in 2004 and 2007, respectively. All items in the scale were retained after the Rasch analysis. The resulting scale had reasonably good fit to the Rasch model. The items performed the same for the two survey years and there was no differential item functioning relating to patient characteristics. Principal component analysis of the residuals confirmed that the measure to a high degree is unidimensional. However, the data also reflects three potential subscales, each relating to one of the three included aspects of health care.

CONCLUSIONS

The POPEQ had excellent psychometric properties and Rasch analysis further supported the construct validity of the scale by also identifying the three subdimensions originally included as components in the instrument development. The 11-item instrument is recommended in future research on psychiatric out-patient experiences. Future development may lead to the construction of more precise measures of the three subdomains that the POPEQ is based on.

摘要

背景

精神科门诊患者体验问卷(POPEQ)是一种 11 项核心测量工具,用于评估精神科门诊患者对治疗结果的感知、与临床医生互动的质量和信息提供的质量。该问卷在应用经典测试理论后被发现具有可靠性和有效性,但之前尚未通过 Rasch 分析进行评估。

方法

2004 年和 2007 年,挪威进行了两次全国性的精神科门诊患者邮寄调查。通过 Rasch 分析评估 POPEQ 的性能,包括项目功能和差异项目功能。使用项目残差的主成分分析来评估是否存在亚维度。

结果

分别有 6677(43.3%)和 11085(35.2%)名精神科门诊患者对 2004 年和 2007 年的问卷做出了回应。Rasch 分析后保留了量表中的所有项目。由此产生的量表与 Rasch 模型拟合良好。该量表的项目在两个调查年份表现相同,且与患者特征无关的差异项目功能。残差的主成分分析证实,该测量具有高度的单一维度性。然而,数据也反映了三个潜在的亚量表,每个亚量表都与医疗保健的三个方面之一有关。

结论

POPEQ 具有良好的心理计量学特性,Rasch 分析进一步支持了该量表的结构有效性,同时还确定了作为仪器开发组成部分的三个亚维度。建议在未来的精神科门诊患者体验研究中使用 11 项量表。未来的发展可能会导致构建更精确的基于 POPEQ 的三个亚领域的测量工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5735/2955020/50364767b06e/1472-6963-10-282-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5735/2955020/3a2cd2efacca/1472-6963-10-282-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5735/2955020/104e8a53fa06/1472-6963-10-282-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5735/2955020/b5fc18d9e8ab/1472-6963-10-282-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5735/2955020/50364767b06e/1472-6963-10-282-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5735/2955020/3a2cd2efacca/1472-6963-10-282-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5735/2955020/104e8a53fa06/1472-6963-10-282-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5735/2955020/b5fc18d9e8ab/1472-6963-10-282-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5735/2955020/50364767b06e/1472-6963-10-282-4.jpg

相似文献

1
Rasch analysis of the Psychiatric Out-Patient Experiences Questionnaire (POPEQ).心理门诊患者体验问卷(POPEQ)的 Rasch 分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Sep 28;10:282. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-282.
2
The Psychiatric Out-Patient Experiences Questionnaire (POPEQ): data quality, reliability and validity in patients attending 90 Norwegian clinics.精神科门诊体验问卷(POPEQ):挪威90家诊所患者的数据质量、信度和效度
Nord J Psychiatry. 2006;60(2):89-96. doi: 10.1080/08039480600583464.
3
Parent experiences of diabetes care questionnaire (PEQ-DC): reliability and validity following a national survey in Norway.父母参与糖尿病管理问卷(PEQ-DC):挪威全国调查后的信度和效度。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Oct 12;18(1):774. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3591-y.
4
Rasch analysis of the brief Michigan Hand Questionnaire in patients with thumb osteoarthritis.密歇根手问卷在拇指骨关节炎患者中的简要拉斯克分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Jun 8;23(1):551. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05478-4.
5
Evaluation properties of the French version of the OUT-PATSAT35 satisfaction with care questionnaire according to classical and item response theory analyses.根据经典理论和项目反应理论分析,评估法语版门诊患者满意度调查问卷(OUT-PATSAT35)的测评属性。
Qual Life Res. 2014 Sep;23(7):2089-101. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0658-z. Epub 2014 Mar 7.
6
Establishing the HLS-Q12 short version of the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire: latent trait analyses applying Rasch modelling and confirmatory factor analysis.建立欧洲健康素养调查问卷的HLS-Q12简版:应用拉施模型和验证性因素分析的潜在特质分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jun 28;18(1):506. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3275-7.
7
The patient satisfaction questionnaire of EUprimecare project: measurement properties.欧盟优质护理项目的患者满意度调查问卷:测量属性
Int J Qual Health Care. 2016 Jun;28(3):275-80. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzw024. Epub 2016 Mar 18.
8
Refinement and Validation of the Social Participation Restrictions Questionnaire: An Application of Rasch Analysis and Traditional Psychometric Analysis Techniques.社会参与限制问卷的细化和验证:Rasch 分析和传统心理测量分析技术的应用。
Ear Hear. 2019 Mar/Apr;40(2):328-339. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000618.
9
Measurement properties of the Swedish clinical outcomes in routine evaluation outcome measures (CORE-OM): Rasch analysis and short version for depressed and anxious out-patients in a multicultural area.在多元文化地区,评估常规治疗效果的瑞典临床结局研究工具(CORE-OM)的测量特性:用于评估抑郁和焦虑门诊患者的 Rasch 分析和简短版本。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2022 Feb 19;20(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12955-022-01937-7.
10
Application of Rasch Analysis to the Evaluation of the Measurement Properties of the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly.应用 Rasch 分析评价老年听力障碍量表的测量性能。
Ear Hear. 2020 Sep/Oct;41(5):1125-1134. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000832.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient-reported experience measures for people living with dementia: A scoping review.痴呆症患者报告的体验测量:范围综述。
Dementia (London). 2024 Nov;23(8):1354-1381. doi: 10.1177/14713012241272823. Epub 2024 Aug 8.
2
An Overview of Factors Influencing Psychiatric Out-Patient Satisfaction at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Pakistan.巴基斯坦一家三级护理医院影响精神科门诊患者满意度的因素概述。
Cureus. 2022 Jun 10;14(6):e25834. doi: 10.7759/cureus.25834. eCollection 2022 Jun.
3
Measuring the Patient Experience of Mental Health Care: A Systematic and Critical Review of Patient-Reported Experience Measures.

本文引用的文献

1
Development, implementation, and public reporting of the HCAHPS survey.HCAHPS 调查的开发、实施和公开报告。
Med Care Res Rev. 2010 Feb;67(1):27-37. doi: 10.1177/1077558709341065. Epub 2009 Jul 28.
2
Public reporting in health care: how do consumers use quality-of-care information? A systematic review.医疗保健领域的公众报告:消费者如何使用医疗质量信息?一项系统综述。
Med Care. 2009 Jan;47(1):1-8. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181808bb5.
3
Using the Rasch model in nursing research: an introduction and illustrative example.护理研究中Rasch模型的应用:介绍与示例
衡量精神卫生保健的患者体验:对患者报告体验指标的系统与批判性综述
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020 Nov 3;14:2147-2161. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S255264. eCollection 2020.
4
Patients' perception of user involvement in psychiatric outpatient treatment: Associations with patient characteristics and satisfaction.患者对精神科门诊治疗中患者参与度的感知:与患者特征和满意度的关联。
Health Expect. 2020 Dec;23(6):1477-1484. doi: 10.1111/hex.13132. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
5
The Adolescent Patient Experiences of Diabetes Care Questionnaire (APEQ-DC): Reliability and Validity in a Study Based on Data from the Norwegian Childhood Diabetes Registry.青少年糖尿病护理问卷患者体验(APEQ-DC):基于挪威儿童糖尿病登记处数据的一项研究中的信度和效度
Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2019 Dec 27;10:405-416. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S232166. eCollection 2019.
6
A systematic review of the validity and reliability of patient-reported experience measures.患者报告体验测量的有效性和可靠性的系统评价。
Health Serv Res. 2019 Oct;54(5):1023-1035. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13187. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
7
The Patient-Reported Experience Measure for Improving qUality of care in Mental health (PREMIUM) project in France: study protocol for the development and implementation strategy.法国改善精神卫生保健质量的患者报告体验测量(PREMIUM)项目:开发与实施策略的研究方案
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2019 Jan 21;13:165-177. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S172100. eCollection 2019.
8
Parent experiences of diabetes care questionnaire (PEQ-DC): reliability and validity following a national survey in Norway.父母参与糖尿病管理问卷(PEQ-DC):挪威全国调查后的信度和效度。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Oct 12;18(1):774. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3591-y.
9
The Screen for Cognitive Impairment in Psychiatry: Proposal for a polytomous scoring system.精神科认知障碍筛查工具:多分类评分系统的提案。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2018 Sep;27(3):e1598. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1598. Epub 2017 Nov 7.
10
Looking Through the Patients' Eyes: Measuring Patient Satisfaction in a Public Hospital.从患者视角审视:公立医院患者满意度测评
J Patient Exp. 2017 Sep;4(3):121-128. doi: 10.1177/2374373517706614. Epub 2017 May 15.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2009 Mar;46(3):380-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2008.10.007. Epub 2008 Dec 6.
4
The Rasch measurement model in rheumatology: what is it and why use it? When should it be applied, and what should one look for in a Rasch paper?风湿病学中的拉施测量模型:它是什么以及为何使用它?何时应应用该模型,在一篇拉施模型论文中应关注哪些方面?
Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Dec 15;57(8):1358-62. doi: 10.1002/art.23108.
5
Less is more in presenting quality information to consumers.向消费者提供高质量信息时,少即是多。
Med Care Res Rev. 2007 Apr;64(2):169-90. doi: 10.1177/10775587070640020301.
6
Classical test theory and item response theory analyses of multi-item scales assessing parents' perceptions of their children's dental care.对评估父母对其子女牙齿护理认知的多项目量表进行经典测试理论和项目反应理论分析。
Med Care. 2006 Nov;44(11 Suppl 3):S60-8. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000245144.90229.d0.
7
The Psychiatric Out-Patient Experiences Questionnaire (POPEQ): data quality, reliability and validity in patients attending 90 Norwegian clinics.精神科门诊体验问卷(POPEQ):挪威90家诊所患者的数据质量、信度和效度
Nord J Psychiatry. 2006;60(2):89-96. doi: 10.1080/08039480600583464.
8
Case-mix adjustment of the CAHPS Hospital Survey.“消费者医疗服务提供者与系统评估”(CAHPS)医院调查的病例组合调整
Health Serv Res. 2005 Dec;40(6 Pt 2):2162-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00470.x.
9
The Patient Experiences Questionnaire: development, validity and reliability.患者体验问卷:编制、效度与信度
Int J Qual Health Care. 2004 Dec;16(6):453-63. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzh074.
10
The development and validation of the primary care satisfaction survey for women.女性初级保健满意度调查的开发与验证
Womens Health Issues. 2004 Mar-Apr;14(2):35-50. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2004.03.001.