Suppr超能文献

间歇性或连续性能量限制对减肥和代谢性疾病风险标志物的影响:一项针对年轻超重女性的随机试验。

The effects of intermittent or continuous energy restriction on weight loss and metabolic disease risk markers: a randomized trial in young overweight women.

机构信息

Genesis Prevention Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

Int J Obes (Lond). 2011 May;35(5):714-27. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2010.171. Epub 2010 Oct 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The problems of adherence to energy restriction in humans are well known.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the feasibility and effectiveness of intermittent continuous energy (IER) with continuous energy restriction (CER) for weight loss, insulin sensitivity and other metabolic disease risk markers.

DESIGN

Randomized comparison of a 25% energy restriction as IER (∼ 2710 kJ/day for 2 days/week) or CER (∼ 6276 kJ/day for 7 days/week) in 107 overweight or obese (mean (± s.d.) body mass index 30.6 (± 5.1) kg m(-2)) premenopausal women observed over a period of 6 months. Weight, anthropometry, biomarkers for breast cancer, diabetes, cardiovascular disease and dementia risk; insulin resistance (HOMA), oxidative stress markers, leptin, adiponectin, insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1 and IGF binding proteins 1 and 2, androgens, prolactin, inflammatory markers (high sensitivity C-reactive protein and sialic acid), lipids, blood pressure and brain-derived neurotrophic factor were assessed at baseline and after 1, 3 and 6 months.

RESULTS

Last observation carried forward analysis showed that IER and CER are equally effective for weight loss: mean (95% confidence interval ) weight change for IER was -6.4 (-7.9 to -4.8) kg vs -5.6 (-6.9 to -4.4) kg for CER (P-value for difference between groups = 0.4). Both groups experienced comparable reductions in leptin, free androgen index, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, total and LDL cholesterol, triglycerides, blood pressure and increases in sex hormone binding globulin, IGF binding proteins 1 and 2. Reductions in fasting insulin and insulin resistance were modest in both groups, but greater with IER than with CER; difference between groups for fasting insulin was -1.2 (-1.4 to -1.0) μU ml(-1) and for insulin resistance was -1.2 (-1.5 to -1.0) μU mmol(-1) l(-1) (both P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

IER is as effective as CER with regard to weight loss, insulin sensitivity and other health biomarkers, and may be offered as an alternative equivalent to CER for weight loss and reducing disease risk.

摘要

背景

众所周知,人类在遵守能量限制方面存在问题。

目的

比较间歇性连续能量限制(IER)与连续能量限制(CER)在减肥、胰岛素敏感性和其他代谢性疾病风险标志物方面的可行性和有效性。

设计

对 107 名超重或肥胖(平均(±标准差)体重指数 30.6(±5.1)kg/m2)绝经前妇女进行为期 6 个月的 25%能量限制的随机比较,IER(每周 2 天摄入约 2710kJ/d)或 CER(每周 7 天摄入约 6276kJ/d)。体重、人体测量、乳腺癌、糖尿病、心血管疾病和痴呆风险的生物标志物;胰岛素抵抗(HOMA)、氧化应激标志物、瘦素、脂联素、胰岛素样生长因子(IGF)-1 和 IGF 结合蛋白 1 和 2、雄激素、催乳素、炎症标志物(高敏 C 反应蛋白和唾液酸)、脂质、血压和脑源性神经营养因子在基线和 1、3 和 6 个月时进行评估。

结果

最后观察到的向前分析表明,IER 和 CER 在减肥方面同样有效:IER 的平均(95%置信区间)体重变化为-6.4(-7.9 至-4.8)kg,CER 为-5.6(-6.9 至-4.4)kg(两组间差异的 P 值=0.4)。两组的瘦素、游离雄激素指数、高敏 C 反应蛋白、总胆固醇和 LDL 胆固醇、甘油三酯、血压均有所降低,而性激素结合球蛋白、IGF 结合蛋白 1 和 2 则有所增加。两组的空腹胰岛素和胰岛素抵抗均有适度下降,但 IER 组下降幅度大于 CER 组;两组间空腹胰岛素差值为-1.2(-1.4 至-1.0)μU/ml,胰岛素抵抗差值为-1.2(-1.5 至-1.0)μUmmol-1l-1(均 P=0.04)。

结论

IER 在体重减轻、胰岛素敏感性和其他健康生物标志物方面与 CER 一样有效,可作为 CER 的替代品,用于减肥和降低疾病风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验