Suppr超能文献

间歇性与连续性能量限制:对超重/肥胖参与者匹配体重减轻后餐后血糖和脂代谢的不同影响。

Intermittent v. continuous energy restriction: differential effects on postprandial glucose and lipid metabolism following matched weight loss in overweight/obese participants.

机构信息

1Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences,University of Surrey,Guildford GU2 7XH,UK.

2Lighterlife UK Ltd,Cavendish House,Parkway,Harlow Business Park,Essex CM19 5QF,UK.

出版信息

Br J Nutr. 2018 Mar;119(5):507-516. doi: 10.1017/S0007114517003890.

Abstract

The intermittent energy restriction (IER) approach to weight loss involves short periods of substantial (>70 %) energy restriction (ER) interspersed with normal eating. Studies to date comparing IER to continuous energy restriction (CER) have predominantly measured fasting indices of cardiometabolic risk. This study aimed to compare the effects of IER and CER on postprandial glucose and lipid metabolism following matched weight loss. In all, twenty-seven (thirteen male) overweight/obese participants (46 (sem 3) years, 30·1 (sem 1·0) kg/m2) who were randomised to either an IER intervention (2638 kJ for 2 d/week with an overall ER of 22 (sem 0·3) %, n 15) or a CER intervention (2510 kJ below requirements with overall ER of 23 (sem 0·8) %) completed the study. Postprandial responses to a test meal (over 360 min) and changes in anthropometry (fat mass, fat-free mass, circumferences) were assessed at baseline and upon attainment of 5 % weight loss, following a 7-d period of weight stabilisation. The study found no statistically significant difference in the time to attain a 5 % weight loss between groups (median 59 d (interquartile range (IQR) 41-80) and 73 d (IQR 48-128), respectively, P=0·246), or in body composition (P≥0·437). For postprandial measures, neither diet significantly altered glycaemia (P=0·266), whereas insulinaemia was reduced comparatively (P=0·903). The reduction in C-peptide tended (P=0·057) to be greater following IER (309 128 (sem23 268) to 247781 (sem20 709) pmol×360 min/l) v. CER (297 204 (sem25 112) to 301 655 (sem32 714) pmol×360 min/l). The relative reduction in TAG responses was greater (P=0·045) following IER (106 (sem30) to 68 (sem 15) mmol×360 min/l) compared with CER (117 (sem 43) to 130 (sem 31) mmol×360 min/l). In conclusion, these preliminary findings highlight underlying differences between IER and CER, including a superiority of IER in reducing postprandial lipaemia, which now warrant targeted mechanistic evaluation within larger study cohorts.

摘要

间歇性能量限制(IER)减肥法涉及到短时间内大量(>70%)的能量限制(ER),中间穿插正常饮食。迄今为止,将 IER 与连续能量限制(CER)进行比较的研究主要测量了空腹心血管代谢风险指数。本研究旨在比较 IER 和 CER 在匹配体重减轻后对餐后血糖和脂质代谢的影响。共有 27 名(男性 13 名)超重/肥胖参与者(46(sem3)岁,30.1(sem1.0)kg/m2),他们被随机分配到 IER 干预组(每周 2 天摄入 2638kJ,总能量限制率为 22(sem0.3)%,n=15)或 CER 干预组(热量摄入比需求低 2510kJ,总能量限制率为 23(sem0.8)%),完成了研究。在经过 7 天的体重稳定期后,在达到 5%体重减轻时,通过测试餐(360 分钟)和人体测量学(体脂肪、去脂体重、周长)的变化来评估餐后反应。研究发现,两组达到 5%体重减轻的时间没有统计学上的显著差异(中位数分别为 59 天(四分位间距(IQR)41-80)和 73 天(IQR 48-128),P=0.246),或体成分(P≥0.437)。对于餐后指标,两种饮食都没有显著改变血糖(P=0.266),而胰岛素水平相对降低(P=0.903)。与 CER 相比(IER 为 309128(sem23268)至 247781(sem20709)pmol×360min/l),IER 时 C 肽的降低趋势更大(P=0.057)(IER 为 297204(sem25112)至 301655(sem32714)pmol×360min/l)。与 CER 相比(IER 为 106(sem30)至 68(sem15)mmol×360min/l),IER 时 TAG 反应的相对降低更大(P=0.045)(IER 为 117(sem43)至 130(sem31)mmol×360min/l)。总之,这些初步发现强调了 IER 和 CER 之间的潜在差异,包括 IER 在降低餐后血脂方面的优越性,这需要在更大的研究队列中进行有针对性的机制评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验