• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者对癌症相关护理措施满意度的结构和可靠性分析:一项多地点患者导航研究计划研究。

Structural and reliability analysis of a patient satisfaction with cancer-related care measure: a multisite patient navigation research program study.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.

出版信息

Cancer. 2011 Feb 15;117(4):854-61. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25501. Epub 2010 Oct 4.

DOI:10.1002/cncr.25501
PMID:20922802
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3017733/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient satisfaction is an important outcome measure of quality of cancer care and 1 of the 4 core study outcomes of the National Cancer Institute (NCI)-sponsored Patient Navigation Research Program to reduce race/ethnicity-based disparities in cancer care. There is no existing patient satisfaction measure that spans the spectrum of cancer-related care. The objective of this study was to develop a Patient Satisfaction With Cancer Care measure that is relevant to patients receiving diagnostic/therapeutic cancer-related care.

METHODS

The authors developed a conceptual framework, an operational definition of Patient Satisfaction With Cancer Care, and an item pool based on literature review, expert feedback, group discussion, and consensus. The 35-item Patient Satisfaction With Cancer Care measure was administered to 891 participants from the multisite NCI-sponsored Patient Navigation Research Program. Principal components analysis (PCA) was conducted for latent structure analysis. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach coefficient alpha (α). Divergent analysis was performed using correlation analyses between the Patient Satisfaction With Cancer Care, the Communication and Attitudinal Self-Efficacy-Cancer, and demographic variables.

RESULTS

The PCA revealed a 1-dimensional measure with items forming a coherent set explaining 62% of the variance in patient satisfaction. Reliability assessment revealed high internal consistency (α ranging from 0.95 to 0.96). The Patient Satisfaction With Cancer Care demonstrated good face validity, convergent validity, and divergent validity, as indicated by moderate correlations with subscales of the Communication and Attitudinal Self-Efficacy-Cancer (all P < .01) and nonsignificant correlations with age, primary language, marital status, and scores on the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine Long Form (all P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The Patient Satisfaction With Cancer Care is a valid tool for assessing satisfaction with cancer-related care for this sample.

摘要

背景

患者满意度是癌症护理质量的重要衡量标准,也是美国国家癌症研究所(NCI)赞助的患者导航研究计划的 4 项核心研究结果之一,旨在减少癌症护理中基于种族/族裔的差异。目前尚无涵盖癌症相关护理各个方面的患者满意度衡量标准。本研究旨在开发一种与接受诊断/治疗性癌症相关护理的患者相关的患者对癌症护理的满意度衡量标准。

方法

作者基于文献回顾、专家反馈、小组讨论和共识,制定了一个概念框架、患者对癌症护理满意度的操作性定义和项目池。该 35 项患者对癌症护理满意度衡量标准在 NCI 赞助的多地点患者导航研究计划的 891 名参与者中进行了管理。采用主成分分析(PCA)进行潜在结构分析。使用 Cronbach 系数α(α)评估内部一致性。采用相关性分析对患者对癌症护理满意度、沟通和态度自我效能感-癌症以及人口统计学变量进行离散分析。

结果

PCA 显示出一种一维衡量标准,其项目形成一个连贯的集合,解释了患者满意度的 62%。可靠性评估显示出较高的内部一致性(α 范围从 0.95 到 0.96)。患者对癌症护理的满意度具有良好的表面有效性、收敛有效性和离散有效性,这表明与沟通和态度自我效能感-癌症的子量表之间存在中度相关性(所有 P <.01),与年龄、主要语言、婚姻状况和快速估计成人医学素养长式的分数之间没有显著相关性(所有 P >.05)。

结论

患者对癌症护理的满意度是评估该样本对癌症相关护理满意度的有效工具。

相似文献

1
Structural and reliability analysis of a patient satisfaction with cancer-related care measure: a multisite patient navigation research program study.患者对癌症相关护理措施满意度的结构和可靠性分析:一项多地点患者导航研究计划研究。
Cancer. 2011 Feb 15;117(4):854-61. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25501. Epub 2010 Oct 4.
2
Psychometric development and reliability analysis of a patient satisfaction with interpersonal relationship with navigator measure: a multi-site patient navigation research program study.患者对导航员人际关系满意度量表的心理计量学发展和信度分析:一项多站点患者导航研究计划研究。
Psychooncology. 2012 Sep;21(9):986-92. doi: 10.1002/pon.2002. Epub 2011 Jun 17.
3
Psychometric validation and reliability analysis of a Spanish version of the patient satisfaction with cancer-related care measure: a patient navigation research program study.患者对癌症相关护理满意度量表西班牙语版的心理计量学验证和可靠性分析:患者导航研究计划研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2012 Sep;20(9):1949-56. doi: 10.1007/s00520-011-1297-3. Epub 2011 Oct 27.
4
Cross-cultural validation of a Patient Satisfaction with Interpersonal Relationship with Navigator measure: a multi-site patient navigation research study.跨文化验证患者对与导航员关系满意度的测量:一项多地点患者导航研究。
Psychooncology. 2012 Dec;21(12):1309-15. doi: 10.1002/pon.2018. Epub 2011 Jul 1.
5
Satisfaction with cancer care among underserved racial-ethnic minorities and lower-income patients receiving patient navigation.在接受患者导航服务的医疗服务不足的种族少数群体和低收入患者中,对癌症护理的满意度。
Cancer. 2016 Apr 1;122(7):1060-7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29902. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
6
[Validation of the QFS measuring the frequency and satisfaction in social behaviours in psychiatric adult population].[用于评估成年精神病患者社交行为频率与满意度的QFS量表的验证]
Encephale. 2006 Jan-Feb;32(1 Pt 1):45-59. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(06)76136-x.
7
Scoring and psychometric properties of the Eye-Drop Satisfaction Questionnaire (EDSQ), an instrument to assess satisfaction and compliance with glaucoma treatment.《眼药满意度问卷》(EDSQ)的评分和心理测量学特性,该工具用于评估青光眼治疗的满意度和依从性。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2010 Feb 1;10:1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2415-10-1.
8
Psychometric properties of the Persian version of satisfaction with care EORTC-in-patsat32 questionnaire among Iranian cancer patients.伊朗癌症患者中欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织住院患者满意度问卷(EORTC-in-patsat32)波斯语版本的心理测量特性。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(23):10121-8. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.23.10121.
9
Development of a multidimensional measure for recurrent abdominal pain in children: population-based studies in three settings.儿童复发性腹痛多维测量方法的开发:在三种环境下开展的基于人群的研究
Pediatrics. 2005 Feb;115(2):e210-5. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1412.
10
Development and testing of the Oncology Patients' Perceptions of the Quality of Nursing Care Scale.肿瘤患者对护理质量感知量表的开发与测试
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2003 Mar-Apr;30(2):283-90. doi: 10.1188/03.ONF.283-290.

引用本文的文献

1
Care Coordination and Patient Satisfaction With Ambulatory Cancer Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Manitoba, Canada: Report of An Online Survey Study of Patient-Reported Experience Measures With Interpretation Guided by Fit Theory.加拿大曼尼托巴省新冠疫情期间门诊癌症护理的照护协调与患者满意度:一项关于患者报告体验指标的在线调查研究报告,采用适配理论进行解读
JMIR Cancer. 2025 Aug 25;11:e58999. doi: 10.2196/58999.
2
Decision regret after reirradiation of the primary site in patients with prostate cancer.前列腺癌患者原发部位再次放疗后的决策后悔
Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2025 Jul 19;54:101019. doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2025.101019. eCollection 2025 Sep.
3
A computational framework for longitudinal medication adherence prediction in breast cancer survivors: A social cognitive theory based approach.乳腺癌幸存者纵向药物依从性预测的计算框架:一种基于社会认知理论的方法。
PLOS Digit Health. 2025 Jun 10;4(6):e0000839. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000839. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
A Review of Medical Mistrust Across the Cancer Continuum of Care and Current Interventions.癌症连续护理过程中医疗不信任及当前干预措施综述
J Community Health. 2025 Mar 23. doi: 10.1007/s10900-025-01462-w.
5
Associations of dose to the urethra and long-term patient-reported outcomes after radiotherapy with EBRT and HDR brachytherapy boost for prostate cancer.前列腺癌调强适形放疗(EBRT)联合高剂量率近距离放疗(HDR)后尿道剂量与患者长期报告结局的相关性。
Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2025 Jan 10;51:100918. doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2025.100918. eCollection 2025 Mar.
6
Evaluating the implementation and impact of a volunteer navigation oncology support programme: study protocol for a pragmatic, real-world hybrid type 2 study.评估志愿者导航肿瘤支持项目的实施情况及影响:一项实用的真实世界混合型2期研究的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 20;15(1):e088047. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088047.
7
The role of a dedicated Oncology Nurse Navigator in the surgical oncology pathways: 1 year experience from a General Surgery Unit in central Italy with follow up.专门的肿瘤护士导航员在肿瘤外科路径中的作用:意大利中部一个普通外科病房 1 年的经验及随访
Updates Surg. 2024 Sep;76(5):2011-2018. doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-01916-1. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
8
Multidisciplinary Endocrine Tumor Board: Assessment of the Patient Experience.多学科内分泌肿瘤专家委员会:患者体验评估
J Patient Exp. 2024 Feb 4;11:23743735241229383. doi: 10.1177/23743735241229383. eCollection 2024.
9
Cardiometabolic comorbidities in Hispanic/Latino cancer survivors: prevalence and impact on health-related quality of life and supportive care needs.西班牙语裔/拉丁裔癌症幸存者的心脏代谢合并症:患病率及其对健康相关生活质量和支持性护理需求的影响。
Support Care Cancer. 2023 Nov 20;31(12):711. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-08181-9.
10
Perceived injustice and its impact on psychological distress in cancer patients and survivors.癌症患者和幸存者的感知不公及其对心理困扰的影响。
Support Care Cancer. 2023 Jul 1;31(7):433. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-07833-0.

本文引用的文献

1
The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors.因子数量的碎石检验
Multivariate Behav Res. 1966 Apr 1;1(2):245-76. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10.
2
Treatment satisfaction as an outcome measure in cancer clinical treatment trials.作为癌症临床治疗试验的结果测量,治疗满意度。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2002 Dec;2(6):597-606. doi: 10.1586/14737167.2.6.597.
3
Patient-reported outcome measures: the importance of patient satisfaction in surgery.患者报告的结局指标:患者满意度在手术中的重要性。
Surgery. 2009 Sep;146(3):435-43. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.03.019. Epub 2009 May 28.
4
Measuring patient satisfaction in oncology palliative care: psychometric properties of the FAMCARE-patient scale.评估肿瘤姑息治疗中的患者满意度:FAMCARE-患者量表的心理测量特性。
Qual Life Res. 2009 Aug;18(6):747-52. doi: 10.1007/s11136-009-9494-y. Epub 2009 Jun 10.
5
Interpersonal processes of care and patient satisfaction: do associations differ by race, ethnicity, and language?人际护理过程与患者满意度:种族、民族和语言对二者关联有影响吗?
Health Serv Res. 2009 Aug;44(4):1326-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.00965.x. Epub 2009 Mar 31.
6
Cancer patient assessment and reports of excellence: reliability and validity of advanced cancer patient perceptions of the quality of care.癌症患者评估与卓越报告:晚期癌症患者对护理质量认知的可靠性与有效性
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Apr 1;27(10):1621-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.6348. Epub 2009 Mar 2.
7
National Cancer Institute Patient Navigation Research Program: methods, protocol, and measures.美国国立癌症研究所患者导航研究项目:方法、方案与措施
Cancer. 2008 Dec 15;113(12):3391-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23960.
8
Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate-cancer survivors.前列腺癌幸存者的生活质量及对治疗结果的满意度
N Engl J Med. 2008 Mar 20;358(12):1250-61. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa074311.
9
Measuring patient assessments of the quality of outpatient care: a systematic review.衡量患者对门诊护理质量的评估:一项系统综述。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2008 Feb;14(1):148-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2007.00824.x.
10
Patient-reported outcomes assessment in cancer trials: taking stock, moving forward.癌症试验中的患者报告结局评估:总结现状,展望未来。
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Nov 10;25(32):5133-40. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.4644.