Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Med Decis Making. 2011 Mar-Apr;31(2):281-91. doi: 10.1177/0272989X10379646. Epub 2010 Oct 5.
This article presents a valuation study to estimate a preference-based index for a 5-dimensional health state classification for asthma (AQL-5D) derived from the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ).
A sample of 307 members of the UK general population valued 99 asthma health states selected from the AQL-5D using the time tradeoff technique. Models were estimated to predict all possible 3125 health states defined by the AQL-5D, and the models were compared in terms of their ability to predict mean values for the 99 states.
Mean health state values ranged from 0.39 to 0.94 based on an average of 22 valuations per state. A main effects model estimated on mean health state values and adjusted for consistency had the best predictive ability (mean absolute error of 0.047 and only 9/98 states with errors >0.1) and the most logical consistency with levels of the AQL-5D. The low number of valuations per state may have resulted in unreliable estimates for the models. Preference-based condition specific measures are limited in their ability to make cross-disease comparisons.
This is the first study to derive a condition-specific preference-based measure from an existing measure of health-related quality of life in asthma for use in economic evaluation.
本文进行了一项估值研究,旨在基于哮喘生命质量问卷(AQLQ),针对哮喘的 5 维健康状态分类(AQL-5D),估算一个偏好加权指数。
采用时间权衡法,从 AQL-5D 中选择了 99 个哮喘健康状态,英国普通人群样本中的 307 名成员对这些状态进行了赋值。我们建立了模型来预测 AQL-5D 定义的所有可能的 3125 种健康状态,并从预测 99 个状态的均值的能力方面,对模型进行了比较。
基于每个状态的平均 22 次赋值,健康状态的均值范围为 0.39 至 0.94。针对均值健康状态值且经一致性调整的主效应模型具有最佳的预测能力(平均绝对误差为 0.047,仅有 9/98 个状态的误差>0.1),并且与 AQL-5D 的水平具有最合理的一致性。每个状态的赋值数量较少,可能导致模型的估计结果不可靠。基于偏好的特定疾病的衡量标准在进行跨疾病比较时,其能力有限。
这是第一项从现有的哮喘健康相关生命质量衡量标准中,为经济评估专门衍生出一个特定疾病的基于偏好的衡量标准的研究。