Department of Cardiology, College of Medicine, Dongguk University Gyeongju Hospital, 1090-1, Seokjang-dong, Gyeongju, 780-350, Korea.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010 Dec;26(Suppl 2):245-52. doi: 10.1007/s10554-010-9712-2. Epub 2010 Oct 6.
Vulnerable plaques are characterized by large lipid cores, positive remodeling and small coronary calcium deposits. Multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) has recently been shown to be able to characterize coronary artery plaques. The aim of this study was to evaluate culprit coronary lesions for differentiating acute coronary syndrome (ACS) from stable angina pectoris (SAP) using MDCT. 64-slice MDCT was conducted on 71 patients (ACS: 35, SAP: 36). The culprit coronary lesions were assessed according to the type and plaque attenuation (PA) of the plaque and the remodeling index (RI) as the ratio of the lesion and the reference area. The culprit lesion score (CLS) was defined as the sum of every score as 1.2 for a PA ≤ 60 Hounsfield units (HU), 1.1 for a RI ≥ 1.05 and 1.2 for a non-calcified or spotty calcification. More spotty calcification (95.0% vs. 23.1%, P < 0.001), a lower PA (40.17 ± 20.08 HU vs. 96.96 ± 58.19 HU, respectively, P < 0.001) and a higher RI (1.44 ± 0.43 vs. 0.90 ± 0.44, respectively, P < 0.001) were observed in the ACS patients. Also, the CLS of the ACS patients was significantly higher than that of the SAP patients (3.07 ± 0.63 vs. 1.18 ± 1.12, respectively, P < 0.001). A CLS more than 2.0 helped us to differentiate ACS from SAP with a sensitivity of 97.1% and a specificity of 67.6%. The CLS might be a useful tool for differentiating ACS from SAP.
易损斑块的特点是脂质核心大、正性重构和冠状动脉微小钙沉积。多排 CT(MDCT)最近已被证明能够对冠状动脉斑块进行特征描述。本研究旨在使用 MDCT 对罪犯冠状动脉病变进行评估,以区分急性冠脉综合征(ACS)和稳定型心绞痛(SAP)。对 71 例患者(ACS:35 例,SAP:36 例)进行 64 排 MDCT 检查。根据斑块类型和斑块衰减(PA)以及病变与参照区的比值重塑指数(RI)对罪犯冠状动脉病变进行评估。罪犯病变积分(CLS)定义为每种积分之和,PA≤60HU 为 1.2,RI≥1.05 为 1.1,非钙化或斑点状钙化均为 1.2。ACS 患者的斑点状钙化更多(95.0% vs. 23.1%,P<0.001),PA 更低(分别为 40.17±20.08HU 和 96.96±58.19HU,P<0.001),RI 更高(分别为 1.44±0.43 和 0.90±0.44,P<0.001)。此外,ACS 患者的 CLS 明显高于 SAP 患者(分别为 3.07±0.63 和 1.18±1.12,P<0.001)。CLS>2.0 有助于我们区分 ACS 和 SAP,其敏感性为 97.1%,特异性为 67.6%。CLS 可能是区分 ACS 和 SAP 的有用工具。