Dalla-Volta S, Maraglino G, Della-Valentina P, Viena P, Desideri A
Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Padova Medical School and Hospital, Italy.
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1990 Aug;4 Suppl 4:853-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00051292.
Trimetazidine has been shown to have an antianginal effect, increasing exercise capability without producing any significant change of heart rate or systolic blood pressure. The aim of this study was to compare trimetazidine efficiency to that of another classical antianginal drug. A double-blind crossover trimetazidine versus nifedipine trial was carried out in 39 male patients, mean age 58 years, with effort angina for 5 years on average, and a mean number of weekly attacks of 2.4. Thirteen patients had previous myocardial infarction. Nineteen patients received nifedipine (40 mg per day) then trimetazidine (60 mg per day), and 20 patients received the drugs in the opposite order. Each therapeutic period of 6 weeks was preceded by 1 week of washout with placebo. Drug efficacy was assessed by a bicycle exercise tolerance test, performed at the beginning and at the end of each therapeutic period, and by clinical symptoms observed with placebo or with treatment. The statistical analysis was performed according to a crossover design, with repeated measurements. The decrease of the number of weekly attacks was not significantly different with trimetazidine and nifedipine. Results on the exercise test showed no significant differences for maximum workload, the duration of exercise, ST-segment depression at peak exercise, and the time to 1-mm ST-segment depression. Heart rate and systolic blood pressure were not significantly different at rest and at peak exercise. However, the change in the rate-pressure product at the same workload differed significantly between the drugs: It decreased with nifedipine and remained unchanged with trimetazidine, indicating the difference to be in the mode of action of the drug.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
曲美他嗪已被证明具有抗心绞痛作用,可提高运动能力,而不会使心率或收缩压发生任何显著变化。本研究的目的是比较曲美他嗪与另一种经典抗心绞痛药物的疗效。在39名男性患者中进行了一项双盲交叉试验,比较曲美他嗪与硝苯地平的疗效。这些患者平均年龄58岁,平均患劳力性心绞痛5年,每周平均发作2.4次。13名患者曾有过心肌梗死。19名患者先接受硝苯地平(每日40毫克)治疗,然后接受曲美他嗪(每日60毫克)治疗;20名患者则按相反顺序接受药物治疗。每个为期6周的治疗期之前都有1周的安慰剂洗脱期。通过在每个治疗期开始和结束时进行的自行车运动耐力试验以及观察安慰剂或治疗时的临床症状来评估药物疗效。根据交叉设计并进行重复测量进行统计分析。曲美他嗪和硝苯地平在每周发作次数减少方面无显著差异。运动试验结果显示,在最大工作量、运动持续时间、运动高峰时的ST段压低以及出现1毫米ST段压低的时间方面,两者无显著差异。静息和运动高峰时的心率和收缩压无显著差异。然而,在相同工作量下,两种药物的心率-血压乘积变化有显著差异:硝苯地平使其降低,而曲美他嗪则保持不变,这表明两种药物的作用方式不同。(摘要截取自250字)