Molecular Imaging Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-1088, USA.
Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2011 May-Jun;6(3):148-52. doi: 10.1002/cmmi.409. Epub 2010 Oct 8.
Quantum dots (QDs) are fluorescent nanoparticles with broad excitation and narrow, wavelength-tunable emission spectra. They are used extensively for in vitro fluorescence imaging studies and more recently for in vivo small animal and pre-clinical studies. To date there has been little concern about the selection of QD size (and thus emission wavelength peak) and excitation wavelengths, as they have little relevance to the results of in vitro studies. In vivo imaging, however, poses additional constraints, such as the scattering and absorption by tissue, which may influence the signal intensity at the body surface. Here, we demonstrate that longer-wavelength excitation and emission yield less quantization error in measured relative fluorescence intensity, using three near-infrared QDs (QD655, QD705 and QD800) applied to in vivo lymphatic imaging, and a range of excitation wavelengths from the blue to the red. Statistically significant differences in quantization error were observed between nearly all pairs of excitation wavelengths (445-490, 503-555, 575-605, 615-665 and 671-705 nm). Similarly, quantization error decreased with longer emission wavelengths (655, 705 and 800 nm). Light absorbance and scattering were demonstrated to be more potent factors than absorbance efficiency of QDs in producing quantization error in the measured fluorescence intensity. As a result, while wavelengths can be adjusted for qualitative experiments, the longest possible wavelengths should be used if quantification is desired during QD imaging experiments.
量子点 (QDs) 是具有宽激发和窄、波长可调发射光谱的荧光纳米粒子。它们被广泛用于体外荧光成像研究,最近也用于体内小动物和临床前研究。到目前为止,人们很少关注 QD 尺寸(因此发射波长峰值)和激发波长的选择,因为它们与体外研究的结果关系不大。然而,体内成像会带来额外的限制,例如组织的散射和吸收,这可能会影响体表的信号强度。在这里,我们使用三种近红外量子点(QD655、QD705 和 QD800)进行体内淋巴成像,并使用从蓝色到红色的一系列激发波长,证明了较长波长的激发和发射会导致测量的相对荧光强度的量子化误差更小。在几乎所有的激发波长对之间(445-490nm、503-555nm、575-605nm、615-665nm 和 671-705nm)都观察到了量子化误差的显著差异。同样,随着发射波长的增加,量子化误差减小(655nm、705nm 和 800nm)。证明了光吸收率和散射比量子点的吸收率更能产生测量荧光强度中的量子化误差。因此,虽然可以调整波长进行定性实验,但如果在 QD 成像实验中需要定量,则应使用尽可能长的波长。