Cetti R J, Biers S, Keoghane S R
South Coast Stone Centre, Department of Urology, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, UK.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2011 Jan;93(1):31-3. doi: 10.1308/003588411X12851639106990. Epub 2010 Oct 8.
Difficulty may be encountered with retrograde access for rigid and flexible ureterorenoscopy (URS) due to anatomic abnormalities, a narrow ureteric lumen, tortuous ureteric path or previous instrumentation. Ureteric dilatation using a balloon or tapered dilator can occasionally fail and will usually lead to the placement of a ureteric stent. We present our experience and incidence of pre-stenting after failed standard access and dilatation techniques, the aim being to quote a figure for the patient at the time of consent.
Data were collected prospectively from a single surgeon at a regional tertiary referral stone unit. The outcomes of those patients pre-stented, for failed access, were recorded.
Between December 2007 and December 2008, a total of 119 patients underwent flexible and rigid URS. Mean patient age was 49 years (range, 19-86 years). Of these, 107 cases were undertaken for urolithiasis and 12 cases for diagnosis of upper tract malignancy. 12% (13/107) of cases were for pain and non-diagnostic imaging and 8.4% (9/107) of patients were pre-stented because of failed access, without complication, and subsequently had successful interval treatment. Of the remaining successful cases of confirmed urolithiasis, 33% (28/85) and 67% (56/85) were undertaken for ureteric and renal calculi, respectively. Stone clearance rates were 83% (19/23) and 75% (3/4) for lower pole renal calculi 5-10 mm and > 10 mm in size, respectively. The overall clearance rate for lower pole calculi was 81% (22/27). The ureteric stone clearance rate was 86% (24/28) rising to 92% (24/26) in those solitary stones less than 10 mm in size.
The incidence of ureteric pre-stenting in a tertiary referral unit was 8% and should be considered and indeed discussed with patients when obtaining pre-operative consent, especially for purely elective, non-urgent, upper tract cases. The alternative for these difficult, tight ureters is extensive balloon dilatation, with the risk of trauma and the potential for long-term stricture formation.
由于解剖结构异常、输尿管腔狭窄、输尿管走行迂曲或既往有器械操作史,在进行硬性和软性输尿管肾镜检查(URS)时,逆行入路可能会遇到困难。使用球囊或锥形扩张器进行输尿管扩张偶尔会失败,通常会导致输尿管支架的置入。我们介绍了在标准入路和扩张技术失败后预先置入支架的经验和发生率,目的是在患者签署知情同意书时提供一个数据。
前瞻性收集了一家地区三级转诊结石科单一外科医生的资料。记录了那些因入路失败而预先置入支架的患者的治疗结果。
2007年12月至2008年12月期间,共有119例患者接受了软性和硬性URS。患者平均年龄为49岁(范围19 - 86岁)。其中,107例因尿路结石接受治疗,12例因上尿路恶性肿瘤诊断接受治疗。12%(13/107)的病例是因为疼痛和非诊断性影像学检查,8.4%(9/107)的患者因入路失败而预先置入支架,无并发症发生,随后成功进行了间隔期治疗。在其余确诊尿路结石的成功病例中,分别有33%(28/85)和67%(56/85)是针对输尿管结石和肾结石进行的治疗。对于5 - 10毫米和大于10毫米的下极肾结石,结石清除率分别为83%(19/23)和75%(3/4)。下极结石的总体清除率为81%(2(2/27)。输尿管结石清除率为86%(24/28),对于小于10毫米的孤立结石,清除率升至92%(24/26)。
在三级转诊单位中,输尿管预先置入支架的发生率为8%,在获得术前知情同意时应告知患者并进行讨论,特别是对于纯择期、非紧急的上尿路病例。对于这些困难、狭窄的输尿管,另一种选择是进行广泛的球囊扩张,但存在创伤风险和长期狭窄形成的可能性。