• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Driving restrictions for Dutch patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator : Compliance and associated factors.荷兰植入式心脏复律除颤器患者的驾驶限制:依从性及相关因素。
Neth Heart J. 2018 Feb;26(2):69-75. doi: 10.1007/s12471-017-1067-z.
2
Decreased Quality of Life Due to Driving Restrictions After Cardioverter Defibrillator Implantation.因植入心脏除颤器后驾驶受限导致生活质量下降。
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2018 Sep/Oct;33(5):474-480. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000474.
3
Time Course of Subsequent Shocks After Initial Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Discharge and Implications for Driving Restrictions.初始植入式心脏复律除颤器放电后的后续电击时间过程及其对驾驶限制的影响。
JAMA Cardiol. 2016 May 1;1(2):181-8. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2015.0386.
4
Driving following defibrillator implantation: development and pilot results from a nationwide questionnaire.植入除颤器后的驾驶情况:一项全国性问卷调查的开展及初步结果
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2018 Nov 20;18(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s12872-018-0949-3.
5
Driving Restrictions Following Defibrillator Implantation: A Nationwide Register-linked Survey Study on the Impact on Employment, Daily Living, and Driving Behaviour.植入除颤器后的驾驶限制:一项基于全国登记册的关于对就业、日常生活和驾驶行为影响的调查研究
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2024 Aug 9. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae071.
6
Clinical effect of implantable cardioverter defibrillator replacements: when should you resume driving after an implantable cardioverter defibrillator replacement?植入式心律转复除颤器更换的临床效果:更换植入式心律转复除颤器后何时可以恢复驾驶?
Circ J. 2010 Nov;74(11):2301-7. doi: 10.1253/circj.cj-10-0316. Epub 2010 Sep 18.
7
[Driving restrictions for arrhythmia patients--with special reference to the implantable cardioverter/defibrillator].心律失常患者的驾驶限制——特别提及植入式心脏复律除颤器
Z Kardiol. 1996;85 Suppl 6:115-21.
8
Sports and Driving With an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator.植入式心脏复律除颤器与运动及驾驶
Cardiol Rev. 2017 Jan/Feb;25(1):36-42. doi: 10.1097/CRD.0000000000000134.
9
Quality of life and driving in recipients of the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.植入式心脏复律除颤器接受者的生活质量与驾驶情况
Am J Cardiol. 1996 Sep 12;78(5A):51-6. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(96)00502-4.
10
Driving and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks for ventricular arrhythmias: results from the TOVA study.驾驶与植入式心律转复除颤器对室性心律失常的电击治疗:TOVA研究结果
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Dec 4;50(23):2233-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.06.059. Epub 2007 Nov 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Recommendations for driving after implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation and the use of a wearable cardioverter defibrillator : Different viewpoints around the world.植入式心脏除颤器植入后驾驶建议和可穿戴式心脏除颤器的使用:世界各地的不同观点。
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2020 Dec;132(23-24):770-781. doi: 10.1007/s00508-020-01675-0. Epub 2020 May 20.
2
Do we understand the rationale behind driving restrictions in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator?我们是否理解植入式心脏复律除颤器患者驾驶限制背后的基本原理?
Neth Heart J. 2018 Feb;26(2):53-54. doi: 10.1007/s12471-017-1072-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Implementation of guidelines for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy in clinical practice: Which patients do benefit?在临床实践中实施植入式心脏复律除颤器治疗指南:哪些患者受益?
Neth Heart J. 2013 Jun;21(6):274-83. doi: 10.1007/s12471-013-0407-x.
2
The implantable defibrillator and return to operation of vehicles study.可植入式除颤器与重返车辆操作研究。
Europace. 2013 Feb;15(2):212-8. doi: 10.1093/europace/eus254. Epub 2012 Sep 11.
3
Driving restrictions after implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation: an evidence-based approach.植入式心脏复律除颤器植入术后的驾驶限制:一种基于证据的方法。
Eur Heart J. 2011 Nov;32(21):2678-87. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr161. Epub 2011 Jun 5.
4
Experiences of driving and driving restrictions in recipients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator--the patient perspective.植入式心脏复律除颤器受者的驾驶体验和驾驶限制——患者视角。
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2010 Nov-Dec;25(6):E1-E10. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0b013e3181e0f881.
5
Consensus statement of the European Heart Rhythm Association: updated recommendations for driving by patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators.欧洲心律协会共识声明:植入式心脏复律除颤器患者驾驶的更新建议
Europace. 2009 Aug;11(8):1097-107. doi: 10.1093/europace/eup112. Epub 2009 Jun 13.
6
A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7.一种评估广泛性焦虑症的简短量表:GAD-7量表。
Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092.
7
Development of a measure of the concerns held by people with implanted cardioverter defibrillators: the ICDC.
Br J Health Psychol. 2006 May;11(Pt 2):293-301. doi: 10.1348/135910705X52264.
8
Concerns about the implantable cardioverter defibrillator: a determinant of anxiety and depressive symptoms independent of experienced shocks.对植入式心脏复律除颤器的担忧:一种独立于电击经历的焦虑和抑郁症状的决定因素。
Am Heart J. 2005 Apr;149(4):664-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.06.031.
9
DS14: standard assessment of negative affectivity, social inhibition, and Type D personality.DS14:消极情感性、社交抑制和D型人格的标准评估。
Psychosom Med. 2005 Jan-Feb;67(1):89-97. doi: 10.1097/01.psy.0000149256.81953.49.
10
Amiodarone or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for congestive heart failure.胺碘酮或植入式心脏复律除颤器用于治疗充血性心力衰竭。
N Engl J Med. 2005 Jan 20;352(3):225-37. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043399.

荷兰植入式心脏复律除颤器患者的驾驶限制:依从性及相关因素。

Driving restrictions for Dutch patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator : Compliance and associated factors.

作者信息

Jongejan N, Timmermans I, Elders J, Meijer K, Meine M, Doevendans P A, Versteeg H, Tuinenburg A E

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

CoRPS-Center of Research on Psychology in Somatic Diseases, Department of Medical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Neth Heart J. 2018 Feb;26(2):69-75. doi: 10.1007/s12471-017-1067-z.

DOI:10.1007/s12471-017-1067-z
PMID:29260463
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5783892/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dutch patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) are restricted from driving for two months after implantation or shocks. This requires significant lifestyle adjustments and is one of the primary concerns of ICD patients. Previous studies indicated that compliance with the driving restrictions is poor, but insight in socio-demographic, clinical and psychological factors associated with compliance is limited. Hence, this study aimed to explore compliance with the driving restrictions and associated factors in a large sample of Dutch ICD patients.

METHOD

Dutch ICD patients (N = 313) completed an elaborative set of questionnaires at time of implantation and at four months after implantation, assessing socio-demographic, psychological and driving-related characteristics. Clinical data were collected from the patients' medical records.

RESULTS

A substantial subgroup (28%) of the patient sample (median age 64 (interquartile range = 55-71), 81% male) reported to have been noncompliant with the driving restrictions. Univariate analysis indicated that noncompliant patients more often considered refusing the ICD due to the restrictions, compared to compliant patients (19% versus 10%, p = 0.02). Multivariate analysis showed that the feeling of understanding the reason behind the driving restrictions was associated with better compliance (odds ratio = 2.16, 95% confidence interval 1.02-4.56, p = 0.04). No other socio-demographic, clinical, psychological or driving-related factors were associated with compliance.

CONCLUSION

A large number of ICD patients does not comply with the driving restrictions after implantation. This study emphasised the importance of the patient's feeling of understanding the reason behind the restrictions.

摘要

背景

荷兰植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)患者在植入或电击后两个月内被限制驾驶。这需要对生活方式进行重大调整,也是ICD患者主要关心的问题之一。先前的研究表明,对驾驶限制的遵守情况较差,但对与遵守情况相关的社会人口统计学、临床和心理因素的了解有限。因此,本研究旨在探讨大量荷兰ICD患者对驾驶限制的遵守情况及相关因素。

方法

荷兰ICD患者(N = 313)在植入时和植入后四个月完成了一套详尽的问卷,评估社会人口统计学、心理和驾驶相关特征。临床数据从患者病历中收集。

结果

患者样本中的一个相当大的亚组(28%)(中位年龄64岁(四分位间距 = 55 - 71岁),81%为男性)报告未遵守驾驶限制。单因素分析表明,与遵守限制的患者相比,不遵守限制的患者因这些限制而更常考虑拒绝植入ICD(19%对10%,p = 0.02)。多因素分析显示,理解驾驶限制背后原因的感觉与更好的遵守情况相关(优势比 = 2.16,95%置信区间1.02 - 4.56,p = 0.04)。没有其他社会人口统计学、临床、心理或驾驶相关因素与遵守情况相关。

结论

大量ICD患者在植入后不遵守驾驶限制。本研究强调了患者理解限制背后原因的感觉的重要性。