Suppr超能文献

退休是否会影响认知表现?Whitehall II 研究。

Does retirement influence cognitive performance? The Whitehall II Study.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiologyand Public Health, University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

J Epidemiol Community Health. 2011 Nov;65(11):958-63. doi: 10.1136/jech.2010.111849. Epub 2010 Oct 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Occupational work involves many factors capable of protecting cognition. The 'disuse' hypothesis suggests that removal of such factors at retirement may increase the risk of cognitive decline.

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether retirement is significantly associated with cognitive change after adjusting for preretirement cognitive function, personal, social, health and lifestyle factors, work characteristics and leisure activity.

METHODS

participants were from the Whitehall II study, a prospective study of London-based Civil Servants. Short-term memory, the AH4 Part 1 (a test of inductive reasoning), verbal fluency and the Mill Hill Vocabulary Scale were collected at ages 38-60 years, and again, on average 5 years later, at 42-67 years, providing pre- and postretirement cognitive functioning assessments for 2031 participants (470 retired and 1561 working). Linear regression was used to test the association between retirement and cognitive performance adjusted for preretirement cognition.

RESULTS

Mean cognitive test scores increased between the two assessments. However, after adjusting for age, sex, education, occupational social class, Mill Hill score, work characteristics, leisure activities, and indicators of physical and mental health, those retired showed a trend towards smaller test score increases over 5 years than those still working, although this only reached 5% significance in one test (AH4; β=-0.7, 95% CI -1.2 to -0.09) and did not show a dose-response effect with respect to length of time in retirement.

CONCLUSIONS

This trend is consistent with the disuse hypothesis but requires independent replication before it can be accepted as supportive in this respect.

摘要

背景

职业工作涉及许多能够保护认知能力的因素。“不用则废”假说认为,退休时去除这些因素可能会增加认知能力下降的风险。

目的

在调整了退休前认知功能、个人、社会、健康和生活方式因素、工作特征和休闲活动后,检验退休是否与认知变化显著相关。

方法

参与者来自于白厅 II 研究,这是一项对伦敦公务员的前瞻性研究。短期记忆、AH4 第 1 部分(一种归纳推理测试)、语言流畅性和米尔山词汇量表在 38-60 岁时收集,平均 5 年后,在 42-67 岁时再次收集,为 2031 名参与者(470 名退休和 1561 名在职)提供了退休前和退休后的认知功能评估。线性回归用于测试退休与认知表现之间的关联,调整了退休前的认知。

结果

平均认知测试分数在两次评估之间有所增加。然而,在调整了年龄、性别、教育、职业社会阶层、米尔山分数、工作特征、休闲活动以及身体和心理健康指标后,与仍在工作的人相比,退休人员在 5 年内的测试分数增加趋势较小,尽管在一项测试(AH4;β=-0.7,95%置信区间-1.2 至-0.09)中仅达到 5%的显著性,并且与退休时间的长短没有剂量反应关系。

结论

这一趋势与“不用则废”假说一致,但需要独立的重复验证,才能在这方面得到支持。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验