Pring Linda, Ryder Nicola, Crane Laura, Hermelin Beate
Department of Psychology, Goldsmiths, University of London, New Cross, London SE14 6NW, UK.
Perception. 2010;39(8):1094-103. doi: 10.1068/p6674.
We explored the hypothesis that an enhanced local processing style is characteristic of both art and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) by examining local and global processing in savant artists with ASD. Specifically, savant artists were compared against non-talented individuals with ASD or mild/moderate learning difficulties (MLD), as well as artistically talented or nontalented students, on the block-design task and meaningful and abstract versions of the embedded figures test (EFT). Results demonstrated that there were no significant differences between the meaningful and abstract versions of the EFT, in any of the groups. This suggests that the primary process governing performance on this task was perceptual (local), rather than conceptual (global). More interestingly, the savant artists performed above the level of the ASD and MLD groups on the block-design test, but not the EFT. Despite both the block-design task and the EFT measuring local processing abilities, we suggest that this result is due to the block-design task being an active construction task (requiring the conversion of a visual input into a motor output), whereas the EFT is a passive recognition task. Therefore, although an enhanced local processing style is an important aspect of savant artistic talent, motor control also appears to be a necessary skill.
我们通过研究患有自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的天才艺术家的局部和整体加工,探讨了这样一种假设,即增强的局部加工方式是艺术和自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的共同特征。具体而言,在积木设计任务以及嵌入式图形测试(EFT)的有意义和抽象版本中,将天才艺术家与患有ASD或轻度/中度学习困难(MLD)的非天才个体,以及有艺术天赋或无艺术天赋的学生进行了比较。结果表明,在任何一组中,EFT的有意义版本和抽象版本之间均无显著差异。这表明,在此任务中支配表现的主要过程是感知性的(局部的),而非概念性的(整体的)。更有趣的是,天才艺术家在积木设计测试中的表现高于ASD组和MLD组,但在EFT测试中并非如此。尽管积木设计任务和EFT都测量局部加工能力,但我们认为这一结果是由于积木设计任务是一项主动构建任务(需要将视觉输入转换为运动输出),而EFT是一项被动识别任务。因此,尽管增强的局部加工方式是天才艺术才能的一个重要方面,但运动控制似乎也是一项必要技能。