• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用有限元建模对振动中坐姿人体的动力响应和脊柱负荷进行估计。

Biodynamic response and spinal load estimation of seated body in vibration using finite element modeling.

机构信息

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ecole Polytechnique, C.P. 6079, Succ centre-ville, Montreal, Quebec, H3C 3A7, Canada.

出版信息

Ind Health. 2010;48(5):557-64. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.mswbvi-34.

DOI:10.2486/indhealth.mswbvi-34
PMID:20953073
Abstract

Trunk biomechanical models play an indispensable role in predicting muscle forces and spinal loads under whole-body vibration (WBV) exposures. Earlier measurements on the force-motion biodynamic response (impedance, apparent mass) at the body-seat interface and vibration transmissibility (seat to head) have led to the development of different mechanical models. Such models could simulate the overall passive response and serve as an important tool for vehicle seat design. They cannot, however, evaluate physiological parameters of interest under the WBV. On the contrary, anatomical models simulating human's physiological characteristics can predict activities in muscles and their dynamic effects on the spine. In this study, a kinematics-driven nonlinear finite element model of the spine, in which the kinematics data are prescribed, is used to analyse the trunk response in seated WBV. Predictions of the active model (i.e., with varying muscle forces) as compared with the passive model (i.e., with no muscle forces) compared satisfactorily with measurements on vertical apparent mass and seat-to-head transmissibility biodynamic responses. Results demonstrated the crucial role of muscle forces in the dynamic response of the trunk. Muscle forces, while maintaining trunk equilibrium, substantially increased the compression and shear forces on the spine and, hence, the risk of tissue injury.

摘要

躯干生物力学模型在预测全身振动 (WBV) 暴露下的肌肉力和脊柱负荷方面发挥着不可或缺的作用。早期在体-座界面力-运动生物动力学响应(阻抗、表观质量)和振动传递率(座到头部)的测量导致了不同机械模型的发展。这些模型可以模拟整体被动响应,是车辆座椅设计的重要工具。然而,它们无法评估 WBV 下感兴趣的生理参数。相反,模拟人体生理特征的解剖模型可以预测肌肉活动及其对脊柱的动态影响。在这项研究中,使用运动学驱动的非线性有限元脊柱模型来分析坐姿 WBV 中的躯干响应,其中规定了运动学数据。主动模型(即肌肉力变化)的预测与被动模型(即无肌肉力)的预测与垂直表观质量和座到头部传递率生物动力学响应的测量结果相当。结果表明肌肉力在躯干动态响应中的重要作用。肌肉力在保持躯干平衡的同时,大大增加了脊柱上的压缩和剪切力,从而增加了组织损伤的风险。

相似文献

1
Biodynamic response and spinal load estimation of seated body in vibration using finite element modeling.采用有限元建模对振动中坐姿人体的动力响应和脊柱负荷进行估计。
Ind Health. 2010;48(5):557-64. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.mswbvi-34.
2
Seated whole body vibrations with high-magnitude accelerations--relative roles of inertia and muscle forces.高幅度加速度下的坐姿全身振动——惯性和肌肉力量的相对作用。
J Biomech. 2008 Aug 28;41(12):2639-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.06.026. Epub 2008 Jul 30.
3
Trunk active response and spinal forces in sudden forward loading: analysis of the role of perturbation load and pre-perturbation conditions by a kinematics-driven model.突然向前加载时的躯干主动反应和脊柱受力:通过运动学驱动模型分析扰动负荷和预扰动条件的作用
J Biomech. 2015 Jan 2;48(1):44-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.11.006. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
4
Comparison of trunk muscle forces and spinal loads estimated by two biomechanical models.两种生物力学模型估算的躯干肌肉力量与脊柱负荷的比较。
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2009 Aug;24(7):533-41. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2009.05.008. Epub 2009 Jun 2.
5
Finite element modelling and biodynamic response prediction of the seated human body exposed to whole-body vibration.对暴露于全身振动的坐姿人体进行有限元建模和生物动力学响应预测。
Ergonomics. 2023 Dec;66(12):1854-1867. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2023.2168064. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
6
Human body modeling method to simulate the biodynamic characteristics of spine in vivo with different sitting postures.用于模拟不同坐姿下脊柱体内生物动力学特性的人体建模方法。
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 2017 Nov;33(11). doi: 10.1002/cnm.2876. Epub 2017 Apr 7.
7
Analysis of squat and stoop dynamic liftings: muscle forces and internal spinal loads.深蹲和弯腰动态举重分析:肌肉力量与脊柱内部负荷
Eur Spine J. 2007 May;16(5):687-99. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-0240-7. Epub 2006 Nov 14.
8
Elevation and orientation of external loads influence trunk neuromuscular response and spinal forces despite identical moments at the L5-S1 level.尽管在L5-S1水平的力矩相同,但外部负荷的高度和方向会影响躯干神经肌肉反应和脊柱受力。
J Biomech. 2014 Sep 22;47(12):3035-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.06.036. Epub 2014 Jul 5.
9
Muscle activity, internal loads, and stability of the human spine in standing postures: combined model and in vivo studies.站立姿势下人体脊柱的肌肉活动、内部负荷及稳定性:联合模型与体内研究
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Dec 1;29(23):2633-42. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000146463.05288.0e.
10
Wrapping of trunk thoracic extensor muscles influences muscle forces and spinal loads in lifting tasks.躯干胸段伸肌的包裹方式会影响举重任务中的肌肉力量和脊柱负荷。
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2006 Aug;21(7):668-75. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2006.03.006. Epub 2006 May 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of whole-body vibration on reproductive physiology in a rat model of whole-body vibration.全身振动对全身振动大鼠模型生殖生理学的影响。
J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2022 Dec 2;85(23):953-971. doi: 10.1080/15287394.2022.2128954. Epub 2022 Sep 27.
2
Differential response to vibration of three forms of scoliosis during axial cyclic loading: a finite element study.轴向循环加载中三种脊柱侧凸形式的振动反应差异:一项有限元研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Aug 14;20(1):370. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2728-4.
3
Presentation of an Approach on Determination of the Natural Frequency of Human Lumbar Spine Using Dynamic Finite Element Analysis.
一种基于动态有限元分析的人体腰椎自然频率测定方法的介绍。
Appl Bionics Biomech. 2019 Jan 2;2019:5473891. doi: 10.1155/2019/5473891. eCollection 2019.
4
Health effects associated with occupational exposure to hand-arm or whole body vibration.与手臂或全身振动职业接触相关的健康影响。
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2018;21(5):320-334. doi: 10.1080/10937404.2018.1557576. Epub 2018 Dec 25.
5
Whole-Body Vibrations Associated With Alpine Skiing: A Risk Factor for Low Back Pain?与高山滑雪相关的全身振动:腰痛的一个风险因素?
Front Physiol. 2018 Mar 9;9:204. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00204. eCollection 2018.