• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

支持患有糖尿病的夫妇的行为和关系满意度:主要和调节作用。

Support behavior and relationship satisfaction in couples dealing with diabetes: main and moderating effects.

机构信息

Health Psychology Section, Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.

出版信息

J Fam Psychol. 2010 Oct;24(5):578-86. doi: 10.1037/a0021009.

DOI:10.1037/a0021009
PMID:20954768
Abstract

This study examined associations between support behavior, i.e. active engagement and protective buffering, and relationship satisfaction in both patients with diabetes and their partners. Active engagement refers to supportive behavior characterized by involving one's partner in discussions, asking how the other feels, and problem solving strategies. Protective buffering refers to less supportive behavior characterized by denying fears and worries, and by pretending everything is fine. Furthermore, we examined whether there were interactive effects of these two support behaviors on patients' and partners' relationship satisfaction. At baseline (T1), 205 couples rated to which degree they received active engagement and protective buffering from their partners, and completed a measure of relationship satisfaction. At three follow-up assessments, couples were asked to fill out the same measures. Using dyadic data analytic approaches, we found relationship satisfaction to be positively associated with active engagement, and negatively with protective buffering, in both patients and partners. Moreover, we found a moderating effect, in that the negative association between protective buffering and relationship satisfaction was only present when levels of active engagement were relatively low. Again, these results were found for patients as well as their partners. We were able to replicate the T1 results at the other three assessment points. Our findings illustrate the need to consider adequate and less adequate support behaviors simultaneously, and to study the effects on both patients and partners.

摘要

本研究考察了支持行为(即积极参与和保护缓冲)与糖尿病患者及其伴侣关系满意度之间的关联。积极参与是指支持行为的特征,包括让伴侣参与讨论、询问对方感受和解决问题的策略。保护缓冲是指支持行为较少的特征,包括否认恐惧和担忧,以及假装一切都很好。此外,我们还检验了这两种支持行为对患者和伴侣关系满意度是否存在交互作用。在基线(T1)时,205 对夫妇评估了他们从伴侣那里获得积极参与和保护缓冲的程度,并完成了关系满意度的测量。在三次随访评估中,夫妇被要求填写相同的测量表。使用对偶数据分析方法,我们发现关系满意度与患者和伴侣的积极参与呈正相关,与保护缓冲呈负相关。此外,我们发现了一个调节作用,即当积极参与水平相对较低时,保护缓冲与关系满意度之间的负相关才存在。同样,这些结果在患者及其伴侣中都得到了验证。我们能够在其他三个评估点复制 T1 的结果。我们的研究结果表明,需要同时考虑适当和不适当的支持行为,并研究它们对患者和伴侣的影响。

相似文献

1
Support behavior and relationship satisfaction in couples dealing with diabetes: main and moderating effects.支持患有糖尿病的夫妇的行为和关系满意度:主要和调节作用。
J Fam Psychol. 2010 Oct;24(5):578-86. doi: 10.1037/a0021009.
2
Protective buffering and psychological distress among couples coping with breast cancer: The moderating role of relationship satisfaction.应对乳腺癌的夫妻中的保护性缓冲与心理困扰:关系满意度的调节作用
J Fam Psychol. 2007 Sep;21(3):380-8. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.21.3.380.
3
Relationship satisfaction in women: a longitudinal case-control study about the role of breast cancer, personal assertiveness, and partners' relationship-focused coping.女性的关系满意度:一项关于乳腺癌、个人自信以及伴侣以关系为中心应对方式作用的纵向病例对照研究。
Br J Health Psychol. 2008 Nov;13(Pt 4):737-54. doi: 10.1348/135910707X252431. Epub 2007 Nov 12.
4
The association between regulatory focus and distress in patients with a chronic disease: the moderating role of partner support.调节焦点与慢性病患者痛苦之间的关系:伴侣支持的调节作用。
Br J Health Psychol. 2010 Feb;15(Pt 1):63-78. doi: 10.1348/135910709X429091. Epub 2009 Mar 24.
5
Marital satisfaction in patients with cancer: does support from intimate partners benefit those who need it the most?
Health Psychol. 2000 May;19(3):274-82.
6
Discrepancies between patients' and partners' perceptions of unsupportive behavior in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.患者和伴侣对慢性阻塞性肺疾病中不支持行为的看法存在差异。
J Fam Psychol. 2012 Jun;26(3):464-9. doi: 10.1037/a0028333. Epub 2012 Apr 30.
7
The role of distress, neuroticism and time since diagnosis in explaining support behaviors in partners of women with breast cancer: results of a longitudinal analysis.痛苦、神经质及确诊后的时间对解释乳腺癌女性伴侣的支持行为所起的作用:一项纵向分析的结果
Psychooncology. 2007 Oct;16(10):913-9. doi: 10.1002/pon.1153.
8
Relationship among differentiation of self, relationship satisfaction, partner support, and depression in patients with chronic lung disease and their partners.自我分化、关系满意度、伴侣支持与慢性肺部疾病患者及其伴侣抑郁的关系。
J Marital Fam Ther. 2011 Apr;37(2):169-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2009.00167.x.
9
Spousal support and changes in distress over time in couples coping with cancer: the role of personal control.配偶支持与癌症患者夫妻随时间变化的痛苦:个人控制的作用。
J Fam Psychol. 2011 Apr;25(2):310-8. doi: 10.1037/a0022887.
10
Partner support and distress in women with breast cancer: The role of patients' awareness of support and level of mastery.乳腺癌女性的伴侣支持和困扰:患者对支持的意识和掌握程度的作用。
Psychol Health. 2009 Apr;24(4):439-55. doi: 10.1080/08870440801919513.

引用本文的文献

1
Conditions for successful implementation of couple-based collaborative management model of diabetes among community-dwelling older Chinese: a qualitative comparative analysis.成功实施社区居住的中国老年夫妇为基础的糖尿病合作管理模式的条件:定性比较分析。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Dec 11;23(1):832. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04565-y.
2
Couples and concealable chronic illness: Investigating couples' communication, coping, and relational well-being over time.夫妻与可隐藏的慢性疾病:随时间探究夫妻沟通、应对策略和关系幸福感。
J Fam Psychol. 2024 Feb;38(1):136-148. doi: 10.1037/fam0001136. Epub 2023 Aug 24.
3
Dyadic Coping in Couples Facing Chronic Physical Illness: A Systematic Review.
慢性身体疾病夫妻的二元应对:一项系统综述
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 25;12:722740. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.722740. eCollection 2021.
4
Protective Buffering and Individual and Relational Adjustment Following Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Dyadic Daily-Diary Study.造血干细胞移植后的保护性缓冲以及个体与关系调适:一项二元日记研究
Front Psychol. 2019 Sep 24;10:2195. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02195. eCollection 2019.
5
Dyadic Coping in Couples: A Conceptual Integration and a Review of the Empirical Literature.夫妻间的二元应对:概念整合与实证文献综述
Front Psychol. 2019 Mar 26;10:571. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00571. eCollection 2019.
6
The Relationship between Burden and Depression in Spouses of Chronic Kidney Disease Patients.慢性肾病患者配偶的负担与抑郁之间的关系。
Depress Res Treat. 2018 May 13;2018:8694168. doi: 10.1155/2018/8694168. eCollection 2018.
7
The Experience of Partners of Adults with Type 1 Diabetes: an Integrative Review.1 型糖尿病成人患者伴侣的体验:综合评价。
Curr Diab Rep. 2018 Mar 3;18(4):19. doi: 10.1007/s11892-018-0986-4.
8
Disease factors associated with spousal influence on diabetic diet: An exploratory comparison of Vietnamese American and White older adults.与配偶对糖尿病饮食影响相关的疾病因素:越南裔美国人和白人老年人的探索性比较。
Health Psychol Open. 2017 Nov 20;4(2):2055102917738658. doi: 10.1177/2055102917738658. eCollection 2017 Jul-Dec.
9
"Miscarried helping" in adults with Type 2 diabetes: Helping for Health Inventory-Couples.2型糖尿病成人中的“错误帮助”:健康帮助量表-夫妻版
Fam Syst Health. 2017 Dec;35(4):409-419. doi: 10.1037/fsh0000289.
10
Couple Resilience to Economic Pressure Over Time and Across Generations.夫妻应对长期和跨代经济压力的复原力。
J Marriage Fam. 2016 Apr 1;78(2):326-345. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12284. Epub 2016 Feb 5.