Meyer M L, Mourino A P, Farrington F H
Pediatr Dent. 1990 Sep-Oct;12(5):283-7.
The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of triazolam to chloral hydrate with hydroxyzine when sedating young children for dental treatment. Twenty children, age 21 to 74 months, with a mean age of 44 months, were given triazolam. Twenty children, age 23 to 64 months, with a mean age of 42 months, were given chloral hydrate with hydroxyzine. The children were given an elixir of either .02 mg/kg triazolam or 40 mg/kg chloral hydrate with 25 mg hydroxyzine. All subjects received 50% nitrous oxide and were restrained with a Papoose Board. The sedations were videotaped and evaluated by two pediatric dentists not involved in the study. They rated the success of the sedations by degree of sleep, crying, body movements, and overall behavior. Time until onset of action of the agents given, oxygen saturation of arterial blood, and heart rate were measured. The vital signs were consistent for the two groups. There was no statistical difference in the effectiveness of sedation between the two groups.
本研究的目的是比较三唑仑与水合氯醛加羟嗪在小儿牙科治疗镇静中的效果。20名年龄在21至74个月、平均年龄44个月的儿童接受了三唑仑治疗。20名年龄在23至64个月、平均年龄42个月的儿童接受了水合氯醛加羟嗪治疗。给儿童服用的酏剂为0.02mg/kg三唑仑或40mg/kg水合氯醛加25mg羟嗪。所有受试者均吸入50%的氧化亚氮,并使用小儿固定板进行约束。镇静过程进行录像,由两名未参与该研究的儿科牙医进行评估。他们根据睡眠程度、哭闹情况、身体动作和总体行为对镇静的成功程度进行评分。测量给药后起效时间、动脉血氧饱和度和心率。两组的生命体征一致。两组之间镇静效果无统计学差异。