Poorman T L, Farrington F H, Mourino A P
Pediatr Dent. 1990 Sep-Oct;12(5):288-91.
The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of a chloral hydrate/hydroxyzine combination with and without meperidine in the sedation of pediatric dental patients. Twenty children were given 40 mg/kg chloral hydrate and 25 mg hydroxyzine, and 20 children were given 40 mg/kg chloral hydrate and 25 mg hydroxyzine and 0.5 mg/kg meperidine. All children were between the ages of 24 and 60 months and all medications were given orally 1 hr before treatment. The children received 50% nitrous oxide for the entire procedure. All children were restrained in a Papoose Board. The patients were videotaped and their behavior was rated by two independent pediatric dentists using the Houpt Scale. The independent evaluators did not know which sedation regimen had been used. They rated success of the sedations by degree of sleep, crying, body movements, and overall behavior. Oxygen saturation of arterial blood, and heart rate also were measured. The vital signs were consistent for the two groups. There was no significant difference in the effectiveness of the two drug regimens.
本研究的目的是比较水合氯醛/羟嗪联合使用与不联合使用哌替啶对小儿牙科患者进行镇静的效果。20名儿童服用40mg/kg水合氯醛和25mg羟嗪,另外20名儿童服用40mg/kg水合氯醛、25mg羟嗪以及0.5mg/kg哌替啶。所有儿童年龄在24至60个月之间,所有药物均在治疗前1小时口服。整个过程中儿童吸入50%的氧化亚氮。所有儿童均被束缚在小儿固定板上。对患者进行录像,由两名独立的儿童牙医使用豪普特量表对其行为进行评分。独立评估者不知道使用的是哪种镇静方案。他们根据睡眠程度、哭闹、身体动作和总体行为对镇静的成功程度进行评分。还测量了动脉血氧饱和度和心率。两组的生命体征一致。两种药物方案的效果没有显著差异。