• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

小儿牙科患者的清醒镇静:水合氯醛、双羟萘酸羟嗪和哌替啶与水合氯醛和双羟萘酸羟嗪的比较研究

Conscious sedation of pediatric dental patients: an investigation of chloral hydrate, hydroxyzine pamoate, and meperidine vs. chloral hydrate and hydroxyzine pamoate.

作者信息

Hasty M F, Vann W F, Dilley D C, Anderson J A

出版信息

Pediatr Dent. 1991 Jan-Feb;13(1):10-9.

PMID:1945978
Abstract

This study evaluated two oral sedative regimens for the conscious sedation of pediatric dental patients (mean age 37.0 months) unmanageable by traditional behavior management techniques. Regimen A included chloral hydrate (Noctec--E.R. Squibb and Sons, Princeton, NJ) at 50 mg/kg with 25 mg hydroxyzine pamoate (Vistaril--Pfizer Laboratories, New York, NY), plus meperidine (Demerol--Winthrop-Breon, New York, NY) at 1.5 mg/kg. Regimen B included chloral hydrate at 50 mg/kg with 25 mg hydroxyzine pamoate. In a crossover research design, 10 patients were assigned randomly to receive one regimen, to be followed by the alternative regimen during the second appointment. The primary purpose of this study was to determine if meperidine would improve patient behavior, and increase the prevalence of respiratory compromise. A secondary purpose of the study was to develop an objective method to assess behavior during the conscious sedation of pediatric dental patients. Results revealed that the addition of oral meperidine to chloral hydrate and hydroxyzine pamoate resulted in improved behavior (P less than 0.01) during local anesthetic injection, rubber dam delivery, and the operative dental procedure. There was no increase in the prevalence of respiratory compromise with the addition of meperidine.

摘要

本研究评估了两种口服镇静方案用于传统行为管理技术难以控制的小儿牙科患者(平均年龄37.0个月)的清醒镇静。方案A包括50mg/kg水合氯醛(Noctec - E.R. Squibb and Sons公司,新泽西州普林斯顿)加25mg羟嗪帕莫酸盐(Vistaril - 辉瑞实验室,纽约州纽约),再加1.5mg/kg哌替啶(Demerol - 温思罗普 - 布伦公司,纽约州纽约)。方案B包括50mg/kg水合氯醛加25mg羟嗪帕莫酸盐。在交叉研究设计中,10名患者被随机分配接受一种方案,在第二次就诊时接受另一种方案。本研究的主要目的是确定哌替啶是否会改善患者行为并增加呼吸功能不全的发生率。该研究的次要目的是开发一种客观方法来评估小儿牙科患者清醒镇静期间的行为。结果显示,在水合氯醛和羟嗪帕莫酸盐中添加口服哌替啶可使局部麻醉注射、放置橡皮障和牙科手术过程中的行为得到改善(P<0.01)。添加哌替啶后呼吸功能不全的发生率没有增加。

相似文献

1
Conscious sedation of pediatric dental patients: an investigation of chloral hydrate, hydroxyzine pamoate, and meperidine vs. chloral hydrate and hydroxyzine pamoate.小儿牙科患者的清醒镇静:水合氯醛、双羟萘酸羟嗪和哌替啶与水合氯醛和双羟萘酸羟嗪的比较研究
Pediatr Dent. 1991 Jan-Feb;13(1):10-9.
2
Comparison of a chloral hydrate/hydroxyzine combination with and without meperidine in the sedation of pediatric dental patients.水合氯醛/羟嗪联合使用与不联合使用哌替啶在儿科牙科患者镇静中的比较。
Pediatr Dent. 1990 Sep-Oct;12(5):288-91.
3
A retrospective study of chloral hydrate, meperidine, hydroxyzine, and midazolam regimens used to sedate children for dental care.一项关于用于儿童牙科护理镇静的水合氯醛、哌替啶、羟嗪和咪达唑仑方案的回顾性研究。
Pediatr Dent. 2000 Mar-Apr;22(2):107-12.
4
Conscious sedation of pediatric dental patients using chloral hydrate, hydroxyzine, and nitrous oxide--a retrospective study of 382 sedations.使用水合氯醛、羟嗪和一氧化二氮对儿童牙科患者进行清醒镇静——382例镇静的回顾性研究
Pediatr Dent. 1995 Nov-Dec;17(7):424-31.
5
Comparison of chloral hydrate, meperidine, and hydroxyzine to midazolam regimens for oral sedation of pediatric dental patients.水合氯醛、哌替啶、羟嗪与咪达唑仑方案用于儿科牙科患者口服镇静的比较。
Pediatr Dent. 2005 May-Jun;27(3):191-7.
6
Comparison of triazolam to a chloral hydrate/hydroxyzine combination in the sedation of pediatric dental patients.三唑仑与水合氯醛/羟嗪组合用于儿科牙科患者镇静的比较。
Pediatr Dent. 1990 Sep-Oct;12(5):283-7.
7
A randomized double-blind trial of chloral hydrate/hydroxyzine versus midazolam/acetaminophen in the sedation of pediatric dental outpatients.水合氯醛/羟嗪与咪达唑仑/对乙酰氨基酚用于儿科牙科门诊患者镇静的随机双盲试验。
ASDC J Dent Child. 1996 Mar-Apr;63(2):95-100.
8
Children sedated for dental care: a pilot study of the 24-hour postsedation period.接受牙科治疗镇静的儿童:镇静后24小时的初步研究。
Pediatr Dent. 2006 May-Jun;28(3):260-4.
9
[A comparison of the child's behavior between two groups of oral sedative drugs].[两组口服镇静药物对儿童行为的比较]
J Dent Assoc Thai. 1990 Nov-Dec;40(6):237-45.
10
Comparison of oral chloral hydrate with intramuscular ketamine, meperidine, and promethazine for pediatric sedation--preliminary report.口服水合氯醛与肌肉注射氯胺酮、哌替啶和异丙嗪用于儿科镇静的比较——初步报告
Anesth Prog. 1998 Spring;45(2):46-50.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of Treating Severe Childhood Caries under General Anesthesia versus Conscious Sedation.全身麻醉与清醒镇静下治疗重度儿童龋齿的成本效益
JDR Clin Trans Res. 2018 Oct;3(4):336-345. doi: 10.1177/2380084418780712. Epub 2018 Jun 4.
2
Sedation of children undergoing dental treatment.牙科治疗中儿童的镇静
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Dec 17;12(12):CD003877. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003877.pub5.
3
Comparison of sedative effects of oral midazolam/chloral hydrate and midazolam/promethazine in pediatric dentistry.
口服咪达唑仑/水合氯醛与咪达唑仑/异丙嗪在儿童牙科镇静效果的比较。
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2018 Summer;12(3):221-226. doi: 10.15171/joddd.2018.034. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
4
Oral Sedation Postdischarge Adverse Events in Pediatric Dental Patients.儿童牙科患者出院后口服镇静的不良事件
Anesth Prog. 2015 Fall;62(3):91-9. doi: 10.2344/0003-3006-62.3.91.
5
Sedative Effect of Oral Midazolam/Hydroxyzine versus Chloral Hydrate/Hydroxyzine on 2-6 Year-Old Uncooperative Dental Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.口服咪达唑仑/羟嗪与水合氯醛/羟嗪对2至6岁不合作牙科患者的镇静效果:一项随机临床试验。
J Dent (Tehran). 2014 Jan;11(1):93-9. Epub 2014 Jan 31.
6
A prospective study of 2 sedation regimens in children: chloral hydrate, meperidine, and hydroxyzine versus midazolam, meperidine, and hydroxyzine.一项针对儿童两种镇静方案的前瞻性研究:水合氯醛、哌替啶和羟嗪与咪达唑仑、哌替啶和羟嗪的对比。
Anesth Prog. 2006 Fall;53(3):83-90. doi: 10.2344/0003-3006(2006)53[83:APSOSR]2.0.CO;2.
7
Summary of the scientific literature for pain and anxiety control in dentistry.牙科疼痛与焦虑控制的科学文献综述。
Anesth Prog. 1992;39(3):97-103.