Molinari R
Divisione di Oncologia Chirurgica Cervico-Facciale dell'Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori di Milano.
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 1990 Nov-Dec;10(6):579-91.
Clinical classification of cancer of the larynx is an intriguing problem that has not been yet solved by the several proposals followed on during thirty years. The main disagreement deals with their aims that have become strictly prognostic, with no egard for therapeutic indications in individual cases. Apart from this aspect, the prognostic factors taken into account even by the last drawing (TNM UICC 1987) seem too rough to allow a correct statistical comparison among the different therapeutic modalities that can be applied to each clinical situation. This lack becomes exceedingly relevant when controlled therapeutic trials are to be planned, comparing radiotherapy with the various types of surgical procedure. A careful critical review of the successive clinical classifications (UICC, AJC) is made and a new descriptive working classification (CLM) is proposed. It aims first of all at a more rational organization of the main prognostic factors to be considered for all locations and stages, with no radical distortion of the last TNM UICC staging system, some details excepted. Afterwards each stage is subdivided into substages according to the presence or absence of those prognostic factors of known influence on applicability and outcome of all various therapeutic modalities, with particular emphasis to some pending problems. CLM classification makes it possible to set up homogeneous groups of cases on which every type of prospective or retrospective comparison of different treatments can be made. Advantages of the CLM working classification are: no need for further modification; possibility of giving information, after appropriate check, about therapeutic indications; possibility of moving quickly and simply subcategories of cases with similar prognosis from CLM to TNM.
喉癌的临床分类是一个引人关注的问题,三十年来众多提议都未能将其解决。主要的分歧在于这些提议的目标已严格限定为预后,而未考虑个别病例的治疗指征。除此之外,即便最新的分类(1987年国际抗癌联盟TNM分类法)所考虑的预后因素似乎也过于粗略,无法对适用于每种临床情况的不同治疗方式进行正确的统计学比较。当计划开展对照治疗试验,比较放疗与各类手术方法时,这种不足就显得尤为突出。本文对相继出现的临床分类(国际抗癌联盟、美国癌症联合委员会)进行了细致的批判性回顾,并提出了一种新的描述性工作分类法(CLM)。其首要目标是更合理地整合所有部位和分期都需考虑的主要预后因素,在不彻底扭曲国际抗癌联盟最新TNM分期系统的前提下(个别细节除外)。之后,根据对所有治疗方式的适用性和结果有已知影响的预后因素的有无,将每个阶段再细分为亚阶段,尤其强调一些悬而未决的问题。CLM分类法能够建立病例同质性分组,在此基础上可以对不同治疗方法进行各种前瞻性或回顾性比较。CLM工作分类法的优点包括:无需进一步修改;经过适当核查后,有可能提供有关治疗指征的信息;能够快速、简便地将预后相似的病例亚类从CLM转换为TNM。