Department of Mathematical Sciences, Montclair State University, Montclair, NJ, USA.
Am J Clin Nutr. 2010 Dec;92(6):1326-31. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2010.29687. Epub 2010 Oct 20.
Energy intake (EI) during weight loss is difficult and costly to measure accurately.
The objective was to develop and validate a computational energy balance differential equation model to determine individual EI during weight loss.
An algorithm was developed to quantify EI during weight loss based on a validated one-dimensional model for weight change. By using data from a 24-wk calorie-restriction study, we tested the validity of the EI model against 2 criterion measures: 1) EI quantified through food provision from weeks 0-4 and 4-12 and 2) EI quantified through changes in body energy stores [measured with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)] and energy expenditure [measured with doubly labeled water (DLW)] from weeks 4-12 and 12-24.
Compared with food provision, the mean (±SD) model errors were 41 ± 118 kcal/d and -22 ± 230 kcal/d from weeks 0-4 and 4-12, respectively. Compared with EI measured with DXA and DLW, the model errors were -71 ± 272 kcal/d and -48 ± 226 kcal/d from weeks 4-12 and 12-24, respectively. In every comparison, the mean error was never significantly different from zero (P values > 0.10). Furthermore, Bland and Altman analysis indicated that error variance did not differ significantly over amounts of EI (P values > 0.26). Almost all individual participants' values were within CI limits.
The validity of the newly developed EI model was supported by experimental observations and can be used to determine an individual participant's EI during weight loss.
在减肥过程中,能量摄入(EI)很难且昂贵地进行准确测量。
旨在开发和验证一种计算能量平衡微分方程模型,以确定减肥过程中的个体 EI。
基于体重变化的已验证一维模型,开发了一种量化减肥期间 EI 的算法。通过使用 24 周热量限制研究的数据,我们根据 2 项标准测量来测试 EI 模型的有效性:1)通过第 0-4 周和第 4-12 周的食物供应来量化 EI,2)通过第 4-12 周和第 12-24 周的双能 X 射线吸收法(DXA)测量的体能量储存和能量消耗(通过双标记水(DLW)测量)的变化来量化 EI。
与食物供应相比,模型误差的平均值(±SD)分别为第 0-4 周和第 4-12 周的 41±118kcal/d 和-22±230kcal/d。与通过 DXA 和 DLW 测量的 EI 相比,模型误差分别为第 4-12 周和第 12-24 周的-71±272kcal/d 和-48±226kcal/d。在每一次比较中,平均误差从未显著偏离零(P 值>0.10)。此外,Bland 和 Altman 分析表明,误差方差在 EI 量上没有显著差异(P 值>0.26)。几乎所有个体参与者的值都在 CI 范围内。
新开发的 EI 模型的有效性得到了实验观察的支持,可用于确定个体参与者在减肥过程中的 EI。