Kumar Santosh, Kumar Sunil, Ganesamoni Raguram, Mandal Arup K, Prasad Seema, Singh Shrawan K
Department of Urology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Urol Res. 2011 Jun;39(3):181-3. doi: 10.1007/s00240-010-0324-z. Epub 2010 Oct 21.
The objective of the study was to compare the efficacy of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) mixed with lignocaine and eutectic mixture of local anesthetics (EMLA) cream as topically applied surface anesthetics in relieving pain during shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) in a prospective randomized study. Of the 160 patients, 80 patients received DMSO with lignocaine and 80 patients received EMLA cream, applied to the skin of the flank at the area of entry of shock waves. SWL was done with Seimens lithostar multiline lithotripter. The pain during the procedure was assessed using visual analog and verbal rating scores. The mean visual analog scale scores for the two groups were 3.03 for DMSO group and 4.43 for EMLA group. The difference of pain score on visual analog scale was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Similarly, the pain scores as rated on the verbal rating scale were also evaluated; the mean score on verbal rating scale were 2.34 for DMSO group and 3.00 for the EMLA group. The difference between the pain score on verbal rating scale was also found to be statistically significant (p < 0.05). Our study showed that DMSO with lignocaine is a better local anesthetic agent for SWL than EMLA cream. The stone fragmentation and clearance rates are also better in the DMSO group.
本研究的目的是在前瞻性随机研究中,比较二甲亚砜(DMSO)与利多卡因混合剂和局部麻醉药共熔混合物(EMLA)乳膏作为局部应用表面麻醉剂在冲击波碎石术(SWL)期间缓解疼痛的疗效。160例患者中,80例患者接受DMSO与利多卡因混合剂,80例患者接受EMLA乳膏,涂抹于冲击波进入区域的侧腹皮肤。使用西门子Lithostar多线碎石机进行SWL。使用视觉模拟评分和语言评分对手术过程中的疼痛进行评估。两组的平均视觉模拟量表评分为:DMSO组为3.03,EMLA组为4.43。视觉模拟量表上的疼痛评分差异具有统计学意义(p<0.05)。同样,也对语言评分量表上的疼痛评分进行了评估;DMSO组的语言评分量表平均评分为2.34,EMLA组为3.00。语言评分量表上的疼痛评分差异也具有统计学意义(p<0.05)。我们的研究表明,DMSO与利多卡因混合剂作为SWL的局部麻醉剂比EMLA乳膏更好。DMSO组的结石破碎率和清除率也更高。